:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國經濟實質原則成文法化對稅務實務影響之探討
書刊名:高大法學論叢
作者:吳德華
作者(外文):Wu, Francis
出版日期:2012
卷期:8:1
頁次:頁173-177+179-216
主題關鍵詞:實質重於形式原則經濟實質原則經濟實質原則成文法化經濟實質商業目的Substance-over-form doctrineEconomic substance doctrineThe codification of the economic substance doctrineEconomic substanceBusiness purpose
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:40
期刊論文
1.Bankman, Joseph(2000)。The Economic Substance Doctrine。Southern Calitomia Law Review,74,5-30。  new window
2.Berland, David L.(2011)。Stopping the Pendulum: Why Stare Decisis Should Constrain the Court From Further Modification of theSearch Incident to Arrest Exception。University of Illinois Law Review,2011,695-739。  new window
3.Blank, Joshua D.(2009)。Overcoming Overdisclosure: Toward Tax Shelter Detection。University of California Los Angeles Law Review,56,1629-1690。  new window
4.Breyer, Stephen(1992)。On the Uses of Legislative History in Interpreting Statutes。Southern California Law Review,65,845-874。  new window
5.Donaldson, J. Bruce(1964)。When Substance-Over-Form Argument is Available to the Taxpayer。Marquette Law Review,48,41-52。  new window
6.Easterbrook, Frank H.(1994)。Text, History, and Structure in Statutory Interpretation。Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy,17,61-70。  new window
7.Eskridge, Jr., William N.(1998)。Textual ism, The Unknown Ideal? A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law。Michigan Law Review,96,1509-1560。  new window
8.Foster, Sydney(2008)。Should Courts Give Stare Decisis Effect to Statutory Interpretation Methodology?。Georgetown Law Review,96,1863-1911。  new window
9.Galle, Brian(2006)。Interpretative Theory and Tax Shelter Regulation。Virginia Tax Review,26,357-403。  new window
10.Givner, Bruce(2010)。Economic Substance Doctrine-Six Months After Codification。Journal of Tax Practice & Procedure,12(5),29-36。  new window
11.Keinan, Yoram(2007)。Rethinking the Role of the Judicial Step Transaction Principle and a Proposal for Codification。Akron Tax Journal,22,45-100。  new window
12.Killebrew, Paul(2007)。Where Are All The Left-Wing Textualists?。New York University Law Review,82,1895-1928。  new window
13.Madison, Allen D.(2003)。The Tension Between Textualism and Substance-Over-Form Doctrines in Tax Law。Santa Clara Law Review,43,699-750。  new window
14.Nelson, Caleb(2005)。What is Textualism?。Virginia Law Review,91,347-418。  new window
15.Roberts, John C.(2001)。Are Congressional Committees Constitutional?: Radical Textualism, Separation of Powers, And the Enactment Process。Case Western Reserve Law Review,52,489-571。  new window
16.Scalia, Antonin(1989)。The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules。University of Chicago Law Review,56,1175-1188。  new window
17.Sinclair, Michael(2007)。Precedent, Super-Precedent。George Mason Law Review,14(2),363-411。  new window
18.VanderWolk, Jefferson(2009)。Codification of the Economic Substance Doctrine: If We Can't Stop It, Let's Improve It。Tax Notes International,55,547-553。  new window
19.Wald, Patricia M.(1990)。The Sizzling Sleeper: The Use of Legislative History in Constructing Statutes in the 1988-89 Term of the United States Supreme Court。American University Law Review,39,277-310。  new window
研究報告
1.Abrams, Howard E.。Did Codification of Economic Substance Repeal the Partnership Anti-Abuse Rule? (計畫編號:No.10-131)。  new window
圖書
1.McMahon, Jr., Martin J.(2002)。Economic Substance Purposive Activity, And Corporate Tax Shelters。Tax Notes。  new window
2.McMahon, Jr., Martin J.(2003)。Beyond A GAAR: Retrofitting the Code to Rein in 21st Century Tax Shelters。Tax Notes。  new window
3.Ventry, Jr. Dennis J.(2008)。Save the Economic Substance Doctrine form Congress。Tax Notes。  new window
其他
1.Flesher, Tonya K.,Quinn, Tina。Codification of the Economic Substance Doctrine or How Congress Commemorated the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary of the Gregory Case,http://ssm.com/abstract=1759569, 20111122。  new window
2.Greenberg Traurig & Crowell Moring LLP。Economic Substance Doctrine Codified: Surviving Scrutiny Under New IRC §7701(o),http://www.crowell.com/documents/Economic-Substance-Doctrine-Codified.pdf., 20111122。  new window
3.Hancock, Jason(20101102)。Iowans vote to oust all three supreme court justices,http://iowaindependent.com/46917/ iowans-vote-to-oust-allthree- supreme-court-justices, 20111122。  new window
4.Korb, Donald L.(2005)。The Economic Substance Doctrine in the Current Tax Shelter Environment: 2005 University of Southern California Tax Institute,http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/economic_substance_(1_25_05).pdf., 20111122。  new window
5.Large Business and International Division of the Internal Revenue Service, The Guidance for Examiners and Managers on the Codified Economic Substance Doctrine and Related Penalties,http://www.irs.gov/businesses/article/0,,id=242253,00.html, 20111122。  new window
6.Sulzberger, A. G.(20101103)。Ouster of Iowa Judges Sends Signal to Bench,http://www.nytimes.com/2010/1 l/04/us/politics/04judges.html?scp=l&sq=iowa%20supreme%20court&st=cse, 20111122。  new window
7.Zelenak, Lawrence,Chirelstein, Marvin(2005)。A Note on Tax Shelters: Duke Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No.67, at 1-2 and n1,http://ssrn.com/abstract=745385, 20111122。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE