本研究利用資訊計量方法分析生醫類開放近用期刊中高產量作者的學術著作分布，以作為向學者推廣開放近用期刊之參考。研究結果顯示，30位高產量作者發表論文之期刊種數與論文篇數分布呈現冪次分布，2,927篇論文中開放近用期刊論文篇數比例為36%，並有逐年增加的趨勢；而30位作者發表論文的期刊IF值與論文篇數之相關性為低度的正向關係；在論文被引用次數方面，其論文被引用的次數與期刊平均IF值有高度的正向關係；值得注意的是，本研究針對這群高產量作者所做的調查發現，開放近用期刊對其而言並不具有引用優勢，此點與前人研究結論不同。經由本研究的結果，可更加客觀的瞭解高產量作者與一般作者之發表論文模式不同，有助於圖書館瞭解不同的讀者群，提供更為切合讀者需要的服務，促進學術研究之精進。

The study investigated publishing behaviors of high productivity authors who have ever published papers in biomedical open access journals (OAJ). In this study, 2,927 academic papers published by 30 high productivity authors were collected from Web of Science (WOS) database. The results of this study showed that: 1) the categories of the academic journals and in which thenumber of the 30 productivity authors’ papers are displaying power law distribution;2) the percentage of the 2,927 papers in OAJ is 36% and is increasing year by year;3) the correlation between journal impact factor and the number of the papers is modestly positive correlated; 4) with regard to the number of paper citation, the correlation between the mean journal impact factor and the citation of the papers is highly positive correlated; it’s notable that, in this study, to be compared with non-OAJ, OAJhas no citation advantage to these high productivity authors, and this result differs from the predecessors’ researches.