資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.58.56.158)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
使徒保羅論哥林多教會中的婚姻與獨身議題
書刊名:
國立政治大學歷史學報
作者:
崔國瑜
作者(外文):
Tsui, Kuo-yu
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
41
頁次:
頁211-234
主題關鍵詞:
使徒保羅
;
哥林多教會
;
婚姻
;
獨身
;
禁慾主義
;
Paul the Apostle
;
The Corinthian Church
;
Marriage
;
Celibacy
;
Sexual asceticism
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:24
《保羅致哥林多人前書》第七章是基督宗教中最早的一份談論婚姻與獨身的史料,也是影響後世基督宗教倫理學關於性倫理議題上最重要的文獻之一。過往的評論家對於《哥林多人前書》第七章產生了十分歧異的詮釋,有些人主張使徒保羅偏好獨身,也有些人認為保羅是贊成婚姻。有鑑於《哥林多人前書》第七章的重要性與複雜性,本文試圖重新探究保羅此番在哥林多教會脈絡中對於婚姻與獨身之言論,一方面本文檢視過往評論家們所產生的歧異性詮釋,另一方面則參照新近研究之貢獻,以重新闡釋《哥林多人前書》第七章的意義。本文主張:保羅在《哥林多人前書》第七章的言論主要是回應哥林多人對於生活方式的提問,哥林多人的提問則深受希臘化思想所形塑:一來,希臘哲學傳統向來關懷倫理生活,亦對生活方式的選擇多有思索,哥林多人在基督宗教中看見了他們希臘背景也肯定的目標,亦即,離棄婚姻與家庭之繁瑣事務,以專心投身於精神生活之更高目標,由其在猶太天啟思想所預示的末日迫近的危機感之下,獨身更是因應末日處境之最佳生活方式;二來,禁絕性事乃希臘化宗教中普遍的習俗,接近神聖領域之前必須禁絕性事。保羅固然認為獨身為佳,但他也並未將之強加在全體哥林多教會的信友們身上;獨身需要恩賜,沒有此恩賜者,結婚也好,且強過因不能自制而陷入淫亂之危險。單就《哥林多人前書》第七章,吾人並不能斷言保羅為禁慾主義者。保羅之所以成為基督宗教的禁慾主義之父,乃因教父們斷章取義地取用保羅在《哥林多人前書》第七章所表達的獨身偏好,用以支持自己所主張之禁慾主義。
以文找文
The First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians Chapter 7 (1 Cor. 7), the earliest document in Christianity concerning marriage and celibacy, has been one of the most influential passages on Christian sexual ethics throughout history. The diversity of various interpretations on 1 Cor. 7 demonstrates the complexity of this passage. While some commentators opine that Paul prefers celibacy, others think that Paul is also pro-marriage. On the basis of the significance and complexity of 1 Cor. 7, the present article aims to re-examine its diverse interpretations by the past commentators along with the most recent contributions on 1 Cor. 7 in order to elucidate Paul's discourse on marriage and celibacy. It is demonstrated that Paul's discourse in 1 Cor. 7 was in fact geared toward the Corinthians' question of lifestyle, which was primarily shaped by the ethical concern of Greek philosophy and influenced by the practice of sexual abstinence prevalent in Hellenistic religions. In line with the Greek philosophical ideal of pursuing a life of contemplation without disturbances from marriage and family life, Paul also spoke of the highest goal of Christian life as the whole-hearted devotion to the affairs of the Lord, which would best be realized in the lifestyle of the celibate. The whole-hearted devotion was all the more demanded in view of the present crisis in the Corinthian church predicated on Jewish apocalypticism. However, Paul was practical enough not to impose celibacy on the whole Corinthian church. Celibacy, according to Paul, was a gift to only a few, and those without it were exhorted to take on marriage so as to avoid porneia. Paul preferred celibacy while tolerating the realization of sexual desire in the context of marriage. On the single basis of 1 Cor. 7, one cannot conclude that Paul is an advocator of sexual asceticism. That Paul is seen as the father of sexual asceticism in Christianity is mainly due to the out-of-context quoting of 1 Cor. 7 by the church fathers with their agenda of advocating sexual asceticism.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Balch, David L.(1983)。1 Cor 7:32-35 and Stoic Debates about Marriage, Anxiety, and Distraction。Journal of Biblical Literature,102,429-439。
2.
Balch, David L.(1971)。Backgrounds of I Cor. Vii: Saying of the Lord in Q; Moses as an Ascetic [THEIO ANER] in II Cor. Iii18,351-364。
3.
Cartlidge, David R.(1975)。1 Corinthians 7 as a Foundation for a Christian Sex Ethic。Journal or Religion,55,220-234。
4.
Clark, Elizabeth A.(1995)。Antifamilial Tendencies in Ancient Christianity。Journal of the History of Sexuality,3,356-380。
5.
Dawes, G. W.(1990)。But if You Can Gain Your Freedom (1 Cor 7:17-24)。Catholic Biblical Quarterly,52,681-697。
6.
Elliott, J. K.(1972)。Paul's Teaching on Marriage in I Corinthians: Some Problems Reconsidered。New Testament Studies,19,219-225。
7.
Ford, J. Massyngberde(1964-1965)。St. Paul, the Philogamist (I Cor. vii in Early Patristic Exegesis)。New Testament Studies,11,326-348。
8.
Garland, David E.(1983)。The Christian's Posture toward Marriage and Celibacy: 1 Corinthians 7。Review and Expositor,80,351-362。
9.
Jensen, Joseph(1978)。Does Porneia Mean Fornication。Novum Testamentum,20,161-184。
10.
MacDonald, Margaret Y.(1990)。Women Holy in Body and Spirit: The Social Setting of 1 Corinthians 7。New Testament Studies,36,161-181。
11.
Moiser, Jereny(1983)。A Reassessment of Paul's View of Marriage with Reference to 1 Corinthians 7。Journal for Study of the New Testament,18,103-122。
12.
Phipps, W. E.(1982)。Is Paul's Attitude toward Sexual Religions Contained in 1 Cor. 7.1?。New Testament Studies,28,125-131。
13.
Poirier, John C.、Frankovic, Joseph(1996)。Celibacy and Charism in 1 Cor 7:5-7。The Harvard Theological Review,89(1),1-18。
14.
Scroggs, Robin(1972)。Paul and the Eschatological Woman。Journal of the American Academy of Religion,40(3),283-303。
圖書
1.
Hays, Richard B.(1997)。First Corinthians, Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching。Louisville, Ky.:Westminster John Knox Press。
2.
Aland K.、Aland, B.、Karavidopoulos, J.、Martini, C. M.、Metzger, B. M.(1993)。Novum Testamentum Graece。Stuttgart。
3.
Aland K.、Aland, B.、Karavidopoulos, J.、Martini, C. M.、Metzger, B. M.(1995)。Novum Testamentum Graece。
4.
Beattie, Gillian(2005)。Women and Marriage in Paul and His Early Interpreters。London:New York:T & T Clark:T & T Clark。
5.
Bornkamm, Günther(1971)。Paul。New York:Evanston, Ill.:Harper & Row:Harper & Row。
6.
Burke, Trevor J.、Keith, Elliott, J.(2003)。Paul and the Corinthians: Studies on a Community in Conflict: Essays in Honour of Margaret Thrall。Thrall. Leiden:Brill。
7.
Countryman, L. William(2007)。Dirt, Greed, and Sex: Sexual Ethics in the New Testament and Their Implications for Today。Minneapolis:Fortress Press。
8.
Deming, Will(2004)。Paul on Marriage and Celibacy: The Hellenistic Background of 1 Corinthians 7。Grand Rapids, Mich.:William B. Eerdmans。
9.
Evans, Roger Steven(2003)。Sex and Salvation: Virginity as a Soteriological Paradigm in Ancient Christianity。Lanham:University Press of America。
10.
Finn, Richard(2009)。Asceticism in the Graeco-Roman World。Cambridge University Press。
11.
Foucault, Michel、Hurley, Robert(1988)。History of Sexuality, vol. 3, The Care of the Self。New York:Vintage Books。
12.
Gaca, Kathy L.(2003)。The Making of Fornication: Eros, Ethics, and Political Reform in Greek Philosophy and Early Christianity。Berkeley:University of California Press。
13.
Loader, William(2012)。The New Testament on Sexuality。Grand Rapids, MI:Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company。
14.
Martin, Dale B.(1995)。The Corinthian Body。Yale University Press。
15.
Pomeroy, Sarah B.(1995)。Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity。New York:Schocken Books。
16.
Sissa, Giulia(2008)。Sex and Sensuality in the Ancient World。New Haven:London:Yale University Press:Yale University Press。
17.
Wimbush, Vincent L.(1987)。Paul the Worldly Ascetic: Response to the World and Self-Understanding according to 1 Corinthians 7。Macon, Ga.:Mercer University Press。
18.
Yarbrough, O. Larry(1985)。Not like the Gentiles: Marriage Rules in the Letters of Paul。Atlanta, Ga.:Scholars Press。
19.
Rawson, B.(1986)。The Roman Family. in B. Rawson ed.: The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。
20.
Brown, Peter(2008)。The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity, Twentieth Anniversary Edition with a New Introduction。New York:Columbia University Press。
21.
Laertii, Diogenes、Hicks, R. D.(1925)。Lives of Eminent Philosophers。Massachusetts:Harvard Univ. Press。
22.
Sanders, E. P.(1977)。Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion。London:Minneapolis, Minn.:Philadelphia:SCM:Fortress Press。
23.
Clark, Elizabeth A.(1999)。Reading Renunciation: Asceticism and Scripture in Early Christianity。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。
圖書論文
1.
Hollander, Harm W.、Marinus de Jonge(1985)。The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: A Commentary。Studia in Veteris Testamenti pseudepigrapha。Leiden:Brill。
2.
Alexander, Loveday(1998)。Better to Marry than to Burn': St. Paul and the Greek Novel。Ancient Fiction and Early Christian Narrative。Atlanta, Ga.:Scholars Press。
3.
Castelli, Elizabeth A.(1999)。Disciplines of Difference: Asceticism and History in Paul。Asceticism and the New Testament。New York:Routledge。
4.
Fee, Gordon D.(2003)。1 Corinthians 7:1-7 Revisited。Paul and the Corinthians: Studies on a Community in Conflict: Essays in Honour of Margaret Thrall。Leiden, The Netherlands:Boston, Mass.:Brill:Brill。
5.
Grundry-Volf, Judith M.(1996)。Controlling the Bodies: A Theological Profile of the Corinthian Sexual Ascetics (1 Cor 7)。The Corinthian Correspondence, Bibliotheca ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium。Leuven:Peeters。
6.
Grundry-Volf, Judith M.(1994)。Male and Female in Creation and New Creation: Interpretations of Gal 3:28c and 1 Cor 7。To Tell the Mystery: Essays on New Testament Eschatology in Honor of Robert H. Gundry, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series。Sheffield:JSOT。
7.
Jaeger, Werner(1948)。On the Origin and Cycle of the Philosophical Ideal of Life。Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of his Development。Oxford:Clarendon。
8.
Martin, Dale B.(1998)。Paul without Passion。Constructing Early Christian Families。London:Routledge。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
論西北漢簡文書與現實的差距及其意義
2.
日本德川前期吳太伯論的思想史意義
3.
彼得.蓋伊論美國的殖民清教史家
4.
晉商在揚州--從袁耀的幾件作品談起
5.
蕃部棄兒與河東公敵--僕固懷恩叛亂新探
6.
周恩來與彭真關係之研究(1928~1976)
7.
書寫與塑造:1949年後「五四」政治話語及政治形象在大陸的確立:以「胡適思想批判」運動為中心的討論
8.
中國農業機械公司與中國近代農業機械化發展(1943~1949)
9.
宋儒楊時在明代從祀孔廟的歷程及其時代意義
10.
情志過極,非藥可愈--試論金元明清的「以情勝情」療法
11.
金代流外職及其人員資格
12.
西歐中世紀盛期聖婦的身體觀與身份認同
13.
明中葉廣東禁毀淫祠寺觀與寺田處理
14.
我國民法結婚形式要件之修法檢討--儀式婚與登記婚的思辨
15.
從徐國琦Chinese and Americans: A Shared History談美國學界對中美關係史研究的新取徑
QR Code