資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(52.15.61.129)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
從空間規劃到區域治理:英國工黨時期區域規劃、組織與治理機制轉變的脈絡探討
書刊名:
都市與計劃
作者:
鄭安廷
作者(外文):
Cheng, An-ting
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
41:2
頁次:
頁149-167
主題關鍵詞:
歐盟
;
空間規劃
;
規劃體系
;
區域規劃
;
區域治理
;
European Union
;
Spatial planning
;
Planning system
;
Regional planning
;
Regional governance
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:10
空間規劃在過去二十餘年在歐洲聯盟(European Union)逐漸成為國土及區域發展的主流思想。而也因為歐盟對區域發展的高度關注帶動了國際空間規劃研究的興起,並進一步引發相當多國家對原有國土規劃體系乃至於城鄉治理體系的反思。做為歐盟主要會員國之一,英國過去十餘年在區域規劃以及治理議題上的論述及制度上的改變可以說是最為積極與劇烈。基於規劃界持續對於區域規劃與跨域治理制度整合的辯證與檢討,英國政府從90年代末期開始推動一連串的區域發展與治理制度的變革,這樣的趨勢在1997年工黨取得睽違十餘年的執政權後更加確立,而且改革幅度愈加明顯。為了呼應歐盟空間規劃的潮流,英國在工黨執政期間同樣出現了規劃體系與跨域治理同時並進的變革。然而傳統英國規劃體系與歐陸有相當大的差異性,不但存在於制度設計上也根植於政治文化中。基於從規劃到治理的制度性變革,本研究將探討兩點問題:一是規劃思潮的改變對於英國治理上的制度性效果;二是英國空間規劃在制度變革的過程當中是否能夠與原生制度鑲嵌。本論文由於受限於篇幅,將僅針對工黨時期英國區域治理變革為例,討論在歐盟空間規劃概念的演進所產生的政策效果脈絡下,英國規劃體系、組織與機制在近幾年所遭遇的困境以及與原有國家及地方規劃制度的互動與矛盾。
以文找文
During the last two decades, spatial planning has assumed central role in European planning discourse. This phenomenon has also resulted in concerns regarding regional development, and has promoted studies on planning system and town and country governance. As a significant member of the European Union, the UK has witnessed a dramatic change in regional planning and governance institutions. Reflecting changes in other EU member states, the UK experienced a series of institutional changes involving both planning system and cross-boundary governance since the late 1990s, particularly after the Labour Party returned to power in 1997. This article aims to understand the influence of spatial planning on regional governance, and the engagement between the old and new spatial planning systems in the UK. Owing to limitations of space, this investigation only focuses on regional governance in transformation during the Labour Administration Period (1997-2010). This study introduces the difficulties that existed within the planning system, organizations and institutions, as well as institutional changes.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Brenner, N.(2001)。The Limits to Scale? Methodological Reflections on Scalar Structuration。Progress in Human Geography,25(4),591-614。
2.
Alden, J.(1999)。Scenarios for the nature of British planning system: The need for a national spatial planning framework。Town Planning Review,70(3),385-407。
3.
Amin, A.(2002)。Spatialities of globalisation。Environment and Planning,34(3),385-399。
4.
Bache, I.、Bristow, G.(2003)。Devolution and the gate-keeping role of the core executive: The struggle for European funds。British Journal of Politics and International Relations,5(3),405-427。
5.
Bianconi, M.、Gallent, N.、Greatbach, I.(2006)。The changing geography of subregional planning in England。Environment and Plannin C: Government and Poliy,24(3),317-330。
6.
Boland, P.(1999)。Merseyside and objective 1 status, 1994-1999: Implications for the next programming period。Regional Studies,33(8),788-792。
7.
Davies, H. W. E.(1994)。Towards a European planning system?。Planning Practice and Research,9(1),63-69。
8.
Davoudi, S.(2003)。European briefing: Polycentricity in European spatial 16. planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda。European Planning Studies,11(8),979-999。
9.
Deas, Lain、Iord, Alex(2006)。From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State。Urban Studies,43(10),1847-1877。
10.
Faludi, A.(2009)。A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The ‘territorial agenda of the european union’ and the ‘first action programme’。Progress in Planning,71(1),1-42。
11.
Fit, J.、Kragt, K.(1994)。The long road to European spatial planning: A matter of practice and mission。Tidjschrift voor Economische on Sociale Geografie,85(5),461-465。
12.
Friedman, J.(2004)。Strategic spatial planning and the longer range。Planning Theory and Practice,5(1),49-67。
13.
Giannakourou, G.(1996)。Towards a European spatial planning policy: Theoretical dilemmas and institutional implications。European Planning Studies,4(5),595-613。
14.
Harris, N.、Hooper, A.、Bishop, K.(2002)。Constructing the practice of spatial planning: A national spatial planning framework for Wales。Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,20(4),555-572。
15.
Keating, M.(1997)。The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe。Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,15(4),383-398。
16.
Phelps, N. A.、Tewdwr-Jones, M.(2000)。Scratching the surface of collaboration and associative governance: Identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building。Environment and Planning A,32(1),111-130。
17.
Rivolin, U. J.、Faludi, F.(2005)。The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovation in Governance。European Planning Studies,13(2),195-215。
18.
Stead, D.、Nadin, V.(1999)。Environmental resources and energy in the United Kingdom: The potential role of a national spatial planning framework。Town Planning Review,70(3),339-362。
19.
Tewdwr-Jones, M.、McNeill, D.(2000)。The politics of city-region planning and governance。European Urban and Regional Studies,7(2),119-134。
20.
Brenner, N.(2003)。Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe。European Urban and Regional Studies,10(4),297-324。
21.
Lovering, John(1999)。Theory Led by Policy: The Inadequacies of the 'New Regionalism'。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,23(2),379-396。
22.
Swyngedouw, Erik(2004)。Globalisation or 'Glocalisation'? Networks, Territories and Rescaling。Cambridge Review of International Affairs,17(1),25-48。
23.
Scott, Allen J.(2001)。Globalization and the Rise of City-Regions。European Planning Studies,9(7),813-826。
24.
Morgan, Kevin(1997)。The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal。Regional Studies,31(5),491-503。
25.
Nadin, V.(2007)。The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England。Planning Practice and Research,22(1),43-62。
會議論文
1.
鄭安廷(2009)。空間規劃-全球化化潮下區域治理的解決方案。台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會 (TASPAA)。高雄。
延伸查詢
2.
鄭安廷(2010)。行政區域整併為強化區域治理效能的唯一選擇。台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會 (TASPAA)。高雄。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Albrechts, L.、Alden, J.、Da Rosa Pires, A.(2001)。The Changing Institutional Landscape of Planning。Aldershot:Ashgate。
2.
Benyon, J(2000)。Urban Policy and Politics in Britain。London:Macmillan Press。
3.
Carley, M.、Christie, I.(1998)。Managing Sustainable Development。London:Earthscan。
4.
Clark, G.、Huxley, J.、Mountford, D.(2010)。Organising Local Economic Development: The Role of Development Agencies and Companies。Paris:OECD Publishing。
5.
Davies, H. W. E.、Edward, D.(1989)。Planning Control in Western Europe。London:HMSO。
6.
Deportment for Communities and Local Government(2008)。Models for Sub-Regional Spatial Planning。London:Department for Communities and Local Government。
7.
HM Treasury(2007)。Review of Sub-national Economic Development and Regeneration。London:HM Treasury。
8.
Madanipour, A.(2001)。The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes。Aldershot:Ashgate。
9.
Newman, P.、Thornley, A.(1996)。Urban Planning in Europe。International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects。London:Routledge。
10.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister(2004)。Planning Policy Statement 11: Regional Spatial Strategies。Lodon:HMSO。
11.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister(2006)。A Framework for City-Regious。London:HMSO。
12.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister(2006)。State of the English Cities。London:HMSO。
13.
Organization for Economic Co-Operationa and Development(2006)。DECE Territorial Reviews: Compotitive Cities in the Global Economy。Paris:OECD。
14.
Rodriguez-Pose, A.(2005)。The City-region Approach to Economic Development, Report to the DFID Urban and Rural Change Team。London:Department for International Development。
15.
Town and County Planning Association(2011)。County Planning Association, Policy Analysis of Housing and Planning Reform。London:Town and County Planning Association。
16.
Vigar, G.、Healey, P.、Hull, A.、Davoudi, S.(2000)。Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy: An Institutional Analysis。London:Macmillan。
17.
Williams, R. H.(1996)。European Union Spatial Policy and Planning。London:Chapman。
18.
Wong, C.、Ravetz, J.、Turner, J.(2000)。The UK Spatial Planning Framework。London:Royal Town Planning Institute。
19.
Faludi, A.、Salet, W.(2000)。The Revival of Spatial Strategic Planning in Europe。Amsterdam:Royal Netherlands Academy of Science。
圖書論文
1.
Healey, P.(1997)。An institutionalist approach to spatial planning。Making Strategic Spatial Plans。London:UCL Press。
2.
Healey, P.(1997)。The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe。Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe。London:UCL Press。
3.
Healey, P.(2001)。Towards a more place-focused planning system in Britain。The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes。Aldershot:Ashgate。
4.
Hudson, R.(2003)。Global production systems and European integration: De-regionalizing, reregionalizing and re-scaling production systems in Europe。Remaking the Global Economy。London:Sage。
5.
Motte, A.(1994)。Innovation in development plan-making in France 1967-1993。Newcastle upon Tyne: Department of Town and Country Planning。Newcastle:University of Newcastle upon Tyne。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
跨域治理模式的建構與評估
2.
美國大都會發展與治理模式在臺灣之應用
無相關博士論文
1.
歐盟的大都會區域治理:以柏林及紐倫堡大都會區域發展為例
無相關著作
1.
都市永續性的多重尺度觀點:以農產品消費土地遠距連接時空變化探討都市與鄉村的關係
2.
都市公園生態化及其發展脈絡:臺北市生態公園的自然鑲嵌與社會特徵分析
3.
因應氣候變遷之都市街區規劃設計策略與永續「共效益」--建物重建階段
4.
臺灣都市階層體系變動趨勢之探討
5.
都市觀光之土地遠距連接物質流對都市永續性的影響
6.
臺灣縣市糧食消費之土地使用比較分析:土地遠距連接之觀點
7.
全球環境變遷對都市永續性的省思
8.
都市永續性的新思維--土地遠距連接、尺度與都市脈絡特刊序文
9.
莫拉克颱風災後住宅重建的進程與永久屋政策的評估
10.
應用系統動態學模擬高速鐵路新竹車站地區都市發展
11.
創意人才、創意產業與創業關聯之研究
12.
應用PPGIS於里山地景變遷分析:以吉哈拉艾為例
13.
迪化街保存特區治理性的形塑、實踐及其特殊性
14.
都市更新容積獎勵制度之謬誤與導正--以臺北市為例
15.
我國都市更新之演進與後設治理
QR Code