:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:專利權之無體性質對專利侵權訴訟程序之影響
書刊名:智慧財產權月刊
作者:張哲倫
作者(外文):Chang, Roger
出版日期:2014
卷期:192
頁次:頁5-20
主題關鍵詞:專利侵權專利權專利權特殊性質公共財無體財產權技藝人士通常知識者
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:3
專利權基於無體型式有其特殊性質,而迥異於一般有體財產權,專利權由於演進之歷史,亦難由羅馬法及 common law尋求上位指導概念,因此由經濟學瞭解專利權高固定成本及低邊際成本之特性,方能微調專利侵權訴訟之審判程序,以切合保護創新之法規目的。在訴訟過程中,依專利法之規定應先界定所屬技藝人士之抽象標準,如此得以正確解讀專利說明書並釐清專利法所面臨之諸多高度抽象法律爭議。
期刊論文
1.李素華(2011)。專利權讓與之給付義務與權利瑕疵擔保--臺灣高等法院九十五年度上字第一○三二號民事判決。月旦裁判時報,11,47-57。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳恭平(20090900)。人非聖賢:簡介行為經濟學。人文與社會科學簡訊,10(4),16-28。  延伸查詢new window
3.熊誦梅(20121200)。分久必合,合久必分--臺灣智慧財產訴訟新制之檢討與展望。月旦民商法雜誌,38,23-39。  延伸查詢new window
4.Waldron, Jeremy(1993)。From Authors to Copiers: Individual Rights and Social Values in Intellectual property。Chi.-Kent. L. Rev.,68(2),841-887。  new window
5.Maier, N. R. F.(1931)。Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness。Journal of Comparative Psychology,12(2),181-194。  new window
6.Rader, Randall R.(2011)。The State of Patent Litigation。Federal Circuit Bar Journal,21,331+340-345。  new window
7.Newman, Pauline(1993)。The Federal Circuit: Judicial Stability or Judicial Activism?。Am. U. L. Rev.,42,683-687。  new window
8.張仁平(20130100)。專利之熟悉該技術者之定義的國際調和。智慧財產權月刊,169,128-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Standeford, Dugie(2008)。Intellectual Property Regime Stifles Science and Innovation, Nobel Laureates Say。INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WATCH,2008(July)。  new window
10.Crouch, Dennis D.(2008)。The Patent Lottery: Exploiting Behavioral Economics for the Common Good。GEORGE MASON LAW REVIEW,16(1),141-172。  new window
11.Epstein, Richard A.(2010)。The Disintegration of Intellectual Property? A Classical Liberal Response to a Premature Obituary。Stanford law review,62(2),455-521。  new window
12.沈宗倫(20120600)。揭開「專利專屬授權」的面紗--簡評新修正專利法相關規範的解釋適用。全國律師,16(6),16-28。  延伸查詢new window
13.Eisenberg, Rebecca S.(1989)。Patents and she Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use。U. Chi. L. Rev.,56,1017。  new window
14.Seifert, Colleen M.(2008)。Nonobviousness: The Shape of Things to Come: Now Why Didn't I Think of That? The Cognitive Processes That Create the Obvious。LEWIS & CLARK L. REV.,12,489-504。  new window
15.Mandel, Gregory(2006)。Patently Non-Obvious II: Experimental Study on the Hindsight Issue Before the Supreme Court in KSR v. Teleflex。Yale J. L. & Tech.,9(1),1-19。  new window
16.Lemley, Mark A.(2005)。Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding。Texas Law Review,83(4),1031-1075。  new window
17.Kitch, Edmund W.(1977)。The Nature and Function of the Patent System。The Journal of Law & Economics,20(2),265-290。  new window
會議論文
1.Machlup, Fritz(1958)。An Economic Review of the Patent System。85th Congress, 2nd Session, Study of the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary,United States Government Printing Office 。Washington。  new window
圖書
1.Kieff, F. Schott、Newman, Pauline、Schwartz, Herbert F.、Smith, Hemy E.(2013)。Principles of Patent Law--Cases and Materials。Foundation Press。  new window
2.Scherer, F. M.、Ross, David(1990)。Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance。  new window
3.Landes, William M.、Posner, Richard A.(2003)。The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law。  new window
4.Cooter, Robert、Ulen, Thomas(2003)。Law and Economics。  new window
5.Shapiro, Carl、Varian, Hal R.(1999)。Information Rules: A Strategic Guide To The Network Economy。  new window
其他
1.(18130813)。Thomas Jefferson to Isaac McPherson,http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/foundera/document/a1_8_8s12.html。  new window
2.林國塘(2014)。談專利審查品質與無效抗辯成立過高之問題,https://www.tipa.org.tw/p3_1-1.asp?nno=207。  延伸查詢new window
3.汪漢卿(2014)。專利技術內容果真輕易思及,https://www.tipa.org.tw/p3_1-1.asp?nno=214。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE