:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:通感、隱喻與多模態隱喻
書刊名:語文與國際研究
作者:黃立鶴
作者(外文):Huang, Li-he
出版日期:2015
卷期:13
頁次:頁91-103
主題關鍵詞:通感隱喻多模態心理認知SynaesthesiaMetaphorMultimodalCognitive perspective
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
作為文學修辭手段的遍感很早便受到學者的關注。認知語言學將通感從文學修辭這一語言現象上升到思維層面加以研究,認為通感的本質是作為人類重要認知方式的概念隱喻。通感有作為語言修辭的通感,也具有作為心理機制的通感;隱喻有作為語言修辭的隱喻,以及作為認知機制的隱喻(概念隱喻);多模態隱喻是隱喻中的一個特殊情況,也有修辭和認知心理兩個層面上的意義。作為心理認知的隱喻是廣義的,其本質是以一種事物去理解和體驗另一種事物。同樣,作為心理認真日的多模態隱喻中的“隱喻”也是廣義的,其本質也是以一種事物去理解和體驗另一種事物,只不過該過程涉及了兩種或兩種以上的感官模態。多模態隱喻具有語言修辭、視覺畫面或聽覺聲音等多個層次上的意義。多模態隱喻在語言文學申以通感這一修辭手法體現,能夠使讀者或聽者調用日常多模態互動的感官經驗,對描寫對象產生更為形象、鮮活的認知。作為語言修辭方法的遍感及多模態隱喻是相應認知心理機制在語言中的體現;作為認知心理機制的遍感及多模態隱喻可體現為隱喻、明喻等多種文學修辭格;通感與多模態隱喻作為認知心理機制可映射於人類與外界交互的多種介面上。
Synaesthesia as a literature rhetoric device has received much attention from scholars. Cognitive linguistics studies synaesthesia at the cognitive level and argues that synaesthesia is a conceptual metaphor as an important cognitive method. Multimodal Metaphor, which is a heated topic in today's metaphor studies, offers a new perspective in the study of synaesthesia as a literature rhetoric device. Both synaesthesia and multimodal metaphor can be considered from the perspectives of language rhetoric and cognitive mechanism. This paper discusses the relation among synaesthesia, metaphor and multimodal metaphor by reviewing previous literature, and some examples are in-detail introduced. Metaphor in the cognitive scale, or conceptual metaphor, whose nature is to provide people the mechanism to understand or experience one item through the other, can be reflected in many ways of language rhetoric. Multimodal metaphor has the same property despite more modalities are involved. Both synaesthesia or multimodal metaphor can be found in language rhetoric, arts creation, aesthetic activities and many other interfaces of daily life since they are regarded as a cognitive mechanism of human beings.
期刊論文
1.Baron-Cohen, S.(1996)。Is there a normal phase of synaesthesia in development?。Psyche,2,27-29。  new window
2.Baron-Cohen, S.、Harrison, J.、Goldstein, L. Wyke(1993)。Coloured speech perception: Is synaesthesia what happens when modularity breaks down?。Perception,22,419-426。  new window
3.Gottfried, Allen W.、Rose, Susan A.、Bridger, Wagner H.(1977)。Cross-Modal Transfer in Human Infants。Child Development,48(1),118-123。  new window
4.Meltzoff, A.、Borton, R.(1979)。Intermodal matching by human neonates。Nature,282,403-404。  new window
5.Simner, Julia(2006)。Beyond perception: synaesthesia as a psycholinguistic phenomenon。TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences,11(1),23-29。  new window
6.陳慶漢(200202)。通感格研究述評。修辭學習,1,7-8。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳育德(2000)。靈心妙悟,感而遂通--論藝術通感。安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學版),28(3),384-388。  延伸查詢new window
8.顧日國(200704)。多媒體、多模態學習剖析。外語電化教學,2,3-12。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃立鶴、何繼紅(201305)。從《Rout1edge多模態分析手冊》看多模態語言研究。語言教育,1,92-95。  延伸查詢new window
10.錢鐘書(1962)。通感。文學評論,1。  延伸查詢new window
11.汪少華、徐健(200206)。通感與概念隱喻戶。外語學刊,3,91-94。  延伸查詢new window
12.王小路、馮駿(201401)。隱喻加工腦區的關聯因素。浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版),1,134-146。  延伸查詢new window
13.趙秀鳳(201101)。概念隱喻研究的新發展多模態隱喻研究。外語研究,1,1-10。  延伸查詢new window
14.周裕鍇(2011)。“六根互用”與宋代文人的生活、審美及文學表現兼論其對“通感”的影響。中國社會科學,2011(6),136-153。  延伸查詢new window
15.褚孝泉(199707)。通感考。復旦學報(社會科學版),4,87-91。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.顧日國(2014)。Multimodality and language use。第15屆中國當代語言學國際研討會,(會議日期: 2014年7月18日至21日)。哈爾濱。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.高志明(2010)。通感研究(博士論文)。福建師範大學,福州。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kress, Gunther R.(2010)。Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication。Routledge。  new window
2.Forceville, C. J.、Urios-Aparisi, E.(2009)。Multimodal metaphor: Applications of cognitive linguistics。The Hague, the Netherlands:Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
3.Bower, T. G. R.(1974)。Development in infancy。San Fransisco:W. H. Freeman。  new window
4.Cooper, David E.(1986)。Metaphor。Basil Blackwell。  new window
5.Kolb, Bryan、Whishaw, lan Q.(2005)。Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology。New York:Worth Publishers。  new window
6.Werner, H.(1973)。Comparative psychology of mental development。New York:International Press。  new window
7.Cameron, Lynne、Low, Graham(1999)。Researching and Applying Metaphor。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Ullmann, Stephen(1964)。Language and Style。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
9.趙豔芳(2001)。認知語言學概論。上海:上海外語教學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Gibson, E. J.(1969)。Principles of perceptual learning and development。New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts。  new window
11.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
12.束定芳(2000)。隱喻學研究。上海:上海外語教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Gibson, James J.(1966)。The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems。Houghton Mifflin。  new window
14.胡壯麟(2004)。認知隱喻學。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.陳望道(19210610)。覺悟。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Cheng, Yin-yuen(2004)。The Construal of Ideational Meaning in Print Advertisement。Multimodal Discourse Analysis-Systemic Functional Perspective。London:Continuum。  new window
2.Forceville, Charles(2009)。Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research。Multimodal Metaphor。Berlinl New York:Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
3.Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr.(1999)。Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world。Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics。Amsterdam:Philadelphia:Benjamins。  new window
4.Maurer, D.(1993)。Neonatal Synesthesia: Implications for the Processing of Speech and Faces。Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. NATO/ASI Series: Behavioural and social sciences。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE