:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政府採購得標廠商進用原住民的合憲性探討--釋字第七一九號解釋評析
書刊名:月旦法學
作者:許育典 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Yue-dian
出版日期:2015
卷期:242
頁次:頁105-128
主題關鍵詞:原住民基本權保障營業自由憲法正當性理由比例原則平等原則Protection of the fundamental rights of indigenous peopleFreedom to conduct businessReasoning of constitutionalityPrinciple of proportionalityPrinciple of equality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
釋字第七一九號,是臺灣釋憲史上第一次出現涉及原住民相關基本權保障的釋義契機,使釋憲機關有機會從原住民相關基本權保障的觀點,展開其對原住民族保障相關法制的放射效力論證,為臺灣原住民族保障相關法制奠定良好基礎。本號解釋不僅開啟了原住民族基本權客觀法的保障,而且建立了定期的檢討修正機制,並類型化了基本權的合憲性檢驗,值得肯定。但本號解釋也同時出現了基本權的涵攝與侵犯、憲法正當性理由論述、比例原則與平等原則適用、以及審查標準的酌定等相關憲法爭點,值得加以探討。
The J.Y. Interpretation No. 719 is the first case involving the protections of the fundamental rights of the indigenous people in the history of constitutional interpretations in Taiwan which gives the Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan a chance to start from the viewpoint of the protection of the fundamental rights of the indigenous people to elaborate the constitutionality of relevant laws implementing the protection of the fundamental rights of indigenous people and to lay the solid constitutional foundation of related laws with regarding the protection of indigenous people. It is praiseworthy because it not only initiates the objective legal protection of the fundamental rights of indigenous people, but also establishes the mechanism of periodical review and categorizes the judicial reviews of the fundamental rights. However, it at the same time discusses the inclusion and infringement of the fundamental rights and the reasoning of the constitutionality. It contains the constitutional issues of the utilization of the principle of proportionality, the principle of equality, and the standard of judicial review. All of above requires a further discussion.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE