:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論死亡之剝奪說
書刊名:國立臺灣大學哲學論評
作者:傅皓政 引用關係
作者(外文):Fu, Hao-cheng
出版日期:2015
卷期:50
頁次:頁1-25
主題關鍵詞:死亡伊比鳩魯快樂主義存在要求死亡的剝奪說DeathEpicurusHedonismExistence requirementDeprivation account of death
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
伊比鳩魯在〈給美諾西厄斯的信〉中提到死亡本身其實並沒有什麼,所以根本無需懼怕,我認為在他的論證中潛藏三個非常重要的預設:(1)快樂主義;(2)物理主義以及(3)存在要求。表面上看起來,伊比鳩魯的論證似乎是成立的,由於人死亡之後就沒有任何感覺,也就不會有任何快樂或痛苦的感受,所以,對死亡者本身而言,他顯然無法評斷死亡這個事件對自己而言到底是好或不好。然而,沒有實際感覺到某個事件所帶來的痛苦經驗,對某人而言就沒有好或不好的評價嗎?事實不然。我在本篇論文中將試圖透過剝奪說證明即使某人無法實際感受到某個事件對他而言是快樂或痛苦,該事件對其本身而言是好或不好仍然是可以評價的,並且透過價值比較理論證成對某人而言,即使他沒有實際感受到該事件帶來的痛苦,我們仍然會同意該事件對他而言確實造成傷害的論題。因此,伊比鳩魯認為死亡並沒有什麼的論證並不成立。
In "Letter to Menoeceus", Epicurus contended that death is nothing to us since it is the deprivation of all sensations. I find that his argument implies at least three assumptions, which are hedonism, physicalism and existence requirement. At first glance, Epicurus' argument seemed to be acceptable due to one is deprived all his sensations and unable to estimate whether death is good or bad for him when death comes. So, it is concluded that death is nothing to us. However, the question follows: is something really not bad for a person if one has no capacity to acquire the unpleasant experiences? I must say that the answer is 'No'. In this essay, I will argue that something is bad for the people even they don't have any unpleasant experience and most of us will agree that he is indeed harmed by the lack of pleasant experiences. Thus, Epicurus' argument is implausible because the strong version of existence requirement is not justified.
期刊論文
1.Nagel, Thomas(1970)。Death。Nous,4,73-80。  new window
2.Rosenbaum, Stephen E.(1986)。How to Be Dead and Not Care: A Defense of Epicurus。American Philosophical Quarterly,23,217-225。  new window
圖書
1.Bennett, Jonathan(2003)。A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Laertius, Diogenes(1925)。Lives of Eminent Philosophers。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Girle, Rod(2009)。Modal Logics and Philosophy。Durham:Acumen。  new window
4.Aristotle、Ross, William David、Brown, Lesley(2009)。The Nicomachean Ethics。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Sidgwick, Henry(2000)。Essays on Ethics and Method。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
6.Kagan, Shelly(2012)。Death。Yale University Press。  new window
7.Luper, Steven(2009)。The Philosophy of Death。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fischer, John Martin(2014)。Mortal harm。The Cambridge Companion to Life and Death。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top