:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:如何理解《六祖壇經》的倫理學型態?
書刊名:國立臺灣大學哲學論評
作者:嚴瑋泓 引用關係
作者(外文):Yen, Wei-hung
出版日期:2015
卷期:50
頁次:頁71-101
主題關鍵詞:六祖壇經佛教倫理學德行倫理學結果主義禪宗倫理The Platform Sutra of the Sixth PatriarchBuddhist ethicsVirtue ethicsConsequentialismEthics of Chan Buddhism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:62
  • 點閱點閱:20
中國佛教倫理思維的特色,在於將戒律的規範性轉移到對心性的重視,其道德實踐的終極目的乃透過排除遮蔽心性的煩惱與顯露清淨本性等進路而完成的。此種主張以禪宗為最,《六祖壇經》中「心平何勞持戒?行直何用修禪?」、「心地無非,自性戒」等說法,特別顯露了中國佛教倫理思維的特色。本文以《壇經》作為探究以禪宗為基礎的倫理學理路。首先從戒律與心性論的視角思考《壇經》的道德思考屬於哪種類型的倫理學?再者,反思《壇經》獨特的倫理思想型態是否與西方倫理學之理論有對話的可能性?一方面從《壇經》內在倫理型態思考其與德行倫理學的相似性,並論述其是否可能為某種形式的德行倫理學;二方面從禪宗哲學明心見性、解脫成佛之終極目的,思考是否可將《壇經》的倫理型態視為某種形式的結果主義?本文的研究成果顯示,《壇經》的倫理學型態包含了返回自性的理路與從緣起與無常所構築的世界觀所引發的「無所住」視角,據此產生一種認識的超越性而指向涅槃解脫。如是般從「認識」而「解脫」的理路提示著一種自律的倫理學型態,在此種型態中,道德主體藉著實踐智慧自發地出於善、完成善。若從理論的相似性來理解《壇經》的倫理學型態,我們最多只能謹慎地作出如下的結論:若從理論的相似性來看,《壇經》的倫理學型態約略可將其類比於德行倫理學與結果主義,甚至是義務論的主張,但若從其理論的內在理路看來,在理論的相似性之外,還必須從差異性來把握其倫理學型態。
The distinguishing feature of Chinese Buddhist ethics is its emphasis of mind-nature over the normativity of precepts. In this system, the ultimate aim of moral practice is achieved through eradicating mental defilements to reveal pure mind-nature-a proposition which is strongly held by Chan Buddhism and clearly revealed through verses in "The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch": “With the tranquil mind, why labor to maintain the precepts? With practice direct, what use is it to cultivate dhyana"; "For the mindground to be without error is the precept of the self-nature". This paper uses "The Platform Sutra" as the theoretical background for probing the ethics on which Chan Buddhism built its foundations. First of all, I analyze the type of ethics that the content of the "The Platform Sutra" can be said to display from the perspective of the view on precepts and mind-nature and subsequently offer my opinion on the similarities between virtue ethics and the type of ethics displayed in "The Platform Sutra". Next, I give consideration to whether "The Platform Sutra" can be classified as a type of consequentialism when viewed in terms of the Chan Buddhist notion of instant revelation, along with the ultimate Buddhist aim of liberation from suffering and the attainment of Buddhahood. The outcome of this paper suggests that, "The Platform Sutra" offers a transcendental cognition aiming at "Nirvana" and that its central theme of "non-abiding", derived from the ethical perspective of this text which in turn is based upon both the theoretical journey of returning to mind-nature and a world view constructed around Dependent Origination and Impermanence. The theoretical journey that starts with "cognition" and culminates in "liberation" prompts an ethical pattern of autonomy, whereas the moral subject spontaneously perfects all virtues through the practical wisdom of proper conduct. When considering the ethics of "The Platform Sutra" it would be prudent to conclude only the following: when seen purely from the aspect of theoretical similarity, the ethical pattern of "The Platform Sutra" can be said to be roughly analogous to virtue ethics and consequentialism, and perhaps even to deontology. However, when the intrinsic theory of "The Platform Sutra" is taken into account, it is evident that apart from theoretical similarity, the view of differentiation still needs to be incorporated into the ethical equation of this text. The outcome of this paper suggests that, "The Platform Sutra" offers a transcendental cognition aiming at "Nirvana" and that its central theme of "non-abiding", derived from the ethical perspective of this text which in turn is based upon both the theoretical journey of returning to mind-nature and a world view constructed around Dependent Origination and Impermanence. The theoretical journey that starts with "cognition" and culminates in "liberation" prompts an ethical pattern of autonomy, whereas the moral subject spontaneously perfects all virtues through the practical wisdom of proper conduct. When considering the ethics of "The Platform Sutra" it would be prudent to conclude only the following: when seen purely from the aspect of theoretical similarity, the ethical pattern of "The Platform Sutra" can be said to be roughly analogous to virtue ethics and consequentialism, and perhaps even to deontology. However, when the intrinsic theory of "The Platform Sutra" is taken into account, it is evident that apart from theoretical similarity, the view of differentiation still needs to be incorporated into the ethical equation of this text.
期刊論文
1.嚴瑋泓(20130100)。論佛教倫理學的「忍辱」與「寬容」:以「阿難受責」的案例為線索。揭諦,24,101-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.嚴瑋泓(2015)。聖嚴法師戒律思想之倫理學義蘊。聖嚴研究,6,413-447。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brear, A. D.(1974)。The Nature and Status of Moral Behavior in Zen Buddhist Tradition。Philosohpy East and West,24(4),429-441。  new window
4.Kasulis, T. P.(2006)。Zen as a Social Ethics of Responsiveness。Journal of Buddhist Ethics,13。  new window
5.楊維中(20011200)。論禪宗心性思想的發展。漢學研究,19(2)=39,141-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Saddhatissa, Hammalawa(1997)。Buddhist Ethics。Wisdom Publications。  new window
2.楊維中(2007)。中國佛教心性論硏究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.林光明、蔡坤昌、林怡馨、楊曾文(2004)。楊校敦博本六祖壇經及其英譯。臺北市:嘉豐。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃連忠(2006)。敦博本六祖壇經校釋。臺北:萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.鳩摩羅什。梵網經。中華電子佛典協會。  延伸查詢new window
6.James, Simon P.(2004)。Zen Buddhism and Environmental Ethics。Ashgate。  new window
7.Kalupahana, David J.(1995)。Ethics in Early Buddhism。Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press。  new window
8.Goodman, Charles(2009)。Consequences of Compassion: An Interpretation and Defense of Buddhist Ethics。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.業露華(2000)。中國佛教倫理思想。上海:上海社會科學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Keown, Damien(2005)。Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction。Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Keown, Damien(2001)。The Nature of Buddhist Ethics。Palgrave。  new window
12.法海。南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經。  延伸查詢new window
13.玄奘。大般若波羅蜜多經。  延伸查詢new window
14.方立天(2007)。中國佛教哲學要義。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.董群(2007)。佛教倫理與中國禪學。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Aitken, Robert(2000)。The Mind of Clover: Essays in Zen Buddhist Ethics。New York:North Point Press。  new window
17.Kant, Immanuel、Wood, Allen W.(2002)。Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
18.Muller, Friedrich Max(1881)。Vajracchedika Prajhaparamita。Oxford University Press。  new window
19.McRae, John R.(2000)。The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: Translated from the Chinese of Tsung-pao。Berkeley, California:Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research。  new window
20.Yampolsky, Philip B.(2012)。The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: The Text of The Tun-Huang Manuscript。Columbia University Press。  new window
21.鳩摩羅什。大智度論。  延伸查詢new window
22.求那跋陀羅。雜阿含經。  延伸查詢new window
23.王月清(1999)。中國佛教倫理研究。南京:南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.楊曾文(2001)。新版敦煌新本•六祖壇經。宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.釋慧能、郭朋(1983)。壇經校釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.Faure, Bernard(1991)。The Rhetoric of Immediacy: A Cultural Critique of Chan/Zen Buddhism。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
27.玄奘。阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論。  延伸查詢new window
28.宗寶。六祖大師法寶壇經。  延伸查詢new window
29.鳩摩羅什。金剛般若波羅蜜經。  延伸查詢new window
30.董群(2000)。禪宗倫理。杭州:浙江人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.釋昭慧(20030000)。佛教規範倫理學。臺北:法界出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Harvey, Peter(2000)。An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues。Cambridge University Press。  new window
33.張國一(2004)。唐代禪宗心性思想。臺北:法鼓文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.釋印順(1993)。精校燉煌本壇經。華雨集。新竹:正聞出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Richardson, Henry S.(2005)。Deontological Ethics。The Encyclopedia of Philosophy。Detroit, Mich.:Macmillan Reference USA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE