臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：董事分期改選制度之研究--從德拉瓦州最高法院Airgas案件為出發
書刊名：東吳法律學報
作者：張心悌 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Hsin-ti
出版日期：2016
卷期：27:3
頁次：頁1-36
主題關鍵詞：董事分期改選制度；董事任期交錯制度；強制累積投票制；任意解任董事；反併購防禦措施；解除董事分期改選制度；Airgas v. Air Products；Staggered board；Classified board；Mandatory cumulative voting；Remove directors without cause；Anti-takeover defense；De-stagger the board；De-classify the board
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:26
董事分期改選制度(staggered board, classified board)於美國法之實踐上已行之有年，惟在我國現行公司法制下可否採行該制度？該制度是否宜明文引進我國？國內之相關討論尚不多見。本文將從2010年美國德拉瓦州最高法院Airgas案件出發，以美國法制、相關學術研究與實踐經驗為比較法之研究分析對象，探討在我國現行法制下是否得採行董事分期改選制度，並進一步從我國公司治理與企業併購等角度分析我國是否宜明文立法引進該制度。本文認為，在分析董事分期改選制度於美國之相關研究與經驗，並思考我國實務運作、公司股權結構之現況，強制累積投票制、任意解任董事之相關規定，以及企業併購價值等因素後，對於我國是否應立法明文採行該制度係持較保留的態度。
Staggered board is (or was) a common practice in many public companies in the United States. Can companies in Taiwan adopt such staggered board under existing Company Act? Shall we recommend the explicit enactment of staggered board in Taiwan? Starting from the 2010 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Airgas case, this article will research and analyze the above issues by taking reference from the U.S. scholarship, studies, practice, and statistics. After considering the U.S. experience and studies, the current Taiwanese corporate governance practice, the shareholding structure, mechanisms of mandatory cumulative voting, director removal without cause and corporate control market, this paper takes a conservative attitude toward the enactment of staggered board into the Taiwanese Company Act.
期刊論文
1.曾宛如(20100900)。股東會與公司治理。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，39(3)，109-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡昌憲(20070300)。企業自治之逆流？--擺盪於強行規定與任意規定間之累積投票制。月旦財經法雜誌，8，29-57。  延伸查詢new window
3.Davidoff, Steven M.(2012)。A Case Study: Air Products v. Airgas and the Value of Strategic Judicial Decision-Making。Colum. Bus. L. Rev.，2012，502。  new window
4.劉連煜(19950100)。累積投票制與應選董事人數之縮減。法令月刊，46(1)，15-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王文宇(20110415)。[實例研習]董事之全體改選與視為提前解任。臺灣法學雜誌，174，96-102。  延伸查詢new window
6.王志誠(2010)。董事之解任：決議解任vs.當然解任--評最高法院98年度台上字第2261號民事判決。月旦裁判時報，4，86-92。  延伸查詢new window
7.林建中(20130400)。一個關於累積投票制的疑惑。政大法學評論，132，71-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.邵慶平(2005)。規範型態與公司治理模式之建構--累積投票制「變」與「不變」的省思與啟示。政大法學評論，88，107-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.邵慶平(2006)。規範型態與公司治理模式之建構--累積投票制「變」與「不變」的省思與啟示。政大法學評論，89，109-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張心悌(2011)。董事之提前解任/最高院98台上2159。台灣法學雜誌，171，179-186。  延伸查詢new window
11.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2002)。Director Primacy in Corporate Takeovers: Preliminary Reflections。Stan. L. Rev.，55，791-817。  new window
12.Bebchuk, Lucian A.、Coates, John C. IV、Subramanian, Guhan(2002)。The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence and Policy。Stanford Law Review，54(5)，887-951。  new window
13.Bebchuk, Lucian A.、Cohen, Alma(2005)。The Costs of Entrenched Boards。Journal of Financial Economics，78(2)，409-433。  new window
14.Bebchuk, Lucian A.(2013)。The Myth That Insulating Board Serves Long-Term Value。Colum. L. Rev.，113，1637-1688。  new window
15.Bebchuk, Lucian A.、Hirst, Scott Rhee(201306)。Towards the Declassification of S&P 500 Boards。Harv. Bus. L. Rev.，3，157-177。  new window
16.Clouser, D. Keith(2012)。Staggered Boards and Annual Meeting: Closing the Loophole in the Staggered Board Defense。U. PA. J. BUS. L.，14，559-582。  new window
17.Coates, John C.(1999)。Measuring the Domain of Mediating Hierarchy: How Contestable are U.S. Public Corporations?。J. CORP. L.，24，837-867。  new window
18.(1955)。Corporations--Rights and Powers of Minority Stockholders--Statute Permitting Staggered Elections of Directors Violates Constitutional Guarantee of Cumulative Voting。Harv. L. Rev.，69，380-383。  new window
19.Sell, Edward W.、Fuge, Lloyed H.(1956)。Impact of Classified Corporate Directorates on the Constitutional Right of Cumulative Voting: A Critical Evaluation of Wolfson v. Avery Problem。U. PITT. L. Rev.，17，151-175。  new window
20.Ganor, Mira(2008)。Why Do Managers Dismantle Staggered Boards?。DEL. J. CORP. L.，33，149-198。  new window
21.Grundfest, Joseph A.(1993)。Just Vote No: A Minimalist Strategy for Dealing with Barbarian inside the Gates。STAN. L. Rev.，45，857-937。  new window
22.Hansmann, Henry、Kraakman, Reinier(2011)。The End of History for Corporate Law。G EORGETOWN L. J.，89，439-468。  new window
23.Klausner, Michael(2013)。Fact and Fiction in Corporate Law and Governance。STAN. L. Rev.，65，1325-1370。  new window
24.Koppes, Richard H.、Ganske, Lyle G.、Hagg, Charles T.(1999)。Corporate Governance Out of Focus: The Debate Over Classified Boards。BUS. LAW.，54，1023-1054。  new window
25.Magurn, Patrick S.(2002)。Classification Cancels Corporate Accountability。STAN. L. Rev.，55，839-844。  new window
26.Faley, Olubunmi(2007)。Classified Boards, Firm Value, and Managerial Entrenchment。Journal of Financial Economics，83(2)，501-529。  new window
27.Gilson, Ronald J.(2006)。Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy。Harvard Law Review，119(6)，1641-1680。  new window
28.Manne, Henry G.(1965)。Merger and the Market for Corporate Control。The Journal of Political Economy，73(2)，110-120。  new window
29.王文宇(20051200)。從股權結構論公司治理法制。月旦民商法雜誌，10，5-24。  延伸查詢new window
30.林國彬(20090900)。敵意併購防禦措施之研究--以財務性防禦措施中之毒藥丸為主要範圍。臺北大學法學論叢，71，81-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2002)。Corporation Law and Economics。Foundation Press。  new window
2.劉連煜(201209)。現代公司法。新學林出版股份有限公司：劉連煜。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brown, Meredith M.、Ferrara, Ralph C.、Bird, Paul S.、Kubek, Gary W.、REGNER, WILLIAM D.(2013)。TAKEOVERS: A STRATEGIC GUIDE TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS。  new window
4.Klein, William A.、Coffee, John C.(1996)。Business Organization and Finance--L EGAL AND ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES。  new window
5.O'Kelley, Charles R. T.、Thompson, Robert B.(2006)。Corporations and Other Business Associations: Cases and Materials。  new window
6.柯芳枝(2003)。公司法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Welch, Edward P.、Turezyn, Andrew J.、Saunders, Robert S.(2011)。Folks on the Delaware General Corporation Law。  new window
其他
1.(2013)。Annual Corporate Governance Review，http://www.georgeson.com/us/resource/Pages/acgr.aspx， 2016/01/10。  new window
2.Bebchuk, Lucian A.，Cohen, Alma，Wang, Charles C. Y.(2011)。Staggered Boards and the Wealth of Shareholders: Evidence from Two Natural Experiments，http://ssrn.com/abstract=1706806， 2016/01/09。  new window
3.Bebchu, Lucian A.，Hirst, Scott Rhee(201406)。Toward Board Declassification in 100 S&P 500 and Fortune 500 Companies: Report of the SRP for the 2012 and 2013 Proxy Seasons，http://ssrn.com/abstract=2400652， 2016/01/10。  new window
4.Gilbert, Daniel(1000)。Oklahoma Board Rule Benefits Chesapeake，http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303763404576418091195332896， 2014/03/31。  new window
5.Noked, Noam(2012)。Activism and the Move toward Annual Director Election，http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/01/15/activism-and-the-move-toward-annual-director-election， 2016/01/09。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1464（臺灣：1441，外國：23） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68318966
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上