臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：公司出售時之受託義務與程序機制--美國德拉瓦州案例法之考察
書刊名：臺北大學法學論叢
作者：黃朝琮
作者(外文)：Huang, Chao-tsung
出版日期：2015
卷期：95
頁次：頁99-194
主題關鍵詞：企業併購；受託義務；忠實義務；獨立委員會；外部股東多數決；經營判斷法則；特別委員會；Merger and acquisition；Fiduciary duty；Duty of loyalty；Revlon；Weinberger；Independent committee；Majority vote of unaffiliated shareholders；MFW；Business judgment rule；Special committee
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:197
  • 點閱點閱:238
公司出售所生之企業併購交易因將造成公司體質的重大變化，如何維持各方利害關係人間權利義務的平衡，乃公司法上之重要課題。此對股東固屬其財產權利之行使與保障，至關重大，對於出售公司之董事與收購方而言，如何有一套可資遵循之遊戲規則，減少過程中之不確定性並避免可能的法律責任，亦屬關鍵。德拉瓦州案例法下之公司出售法制，係以受託義務（fiduciary duty）概念為其核心，而以忠實義務及注意義務為內涵，形成＂Revlon＂及＂Weinberger＂兩大案例法系統，並發展出獨立委員會及外部股東多數決兩大主要程序機制，而根據不同程序機制之使用，調整所應適用之受託義務審查規則，晚近在＂In re MFW Shareholders Litigation＂及＂Kahn, et al. v. M&FWorldwide Corp., et al.＂中，德拉瓦州法院宣示，在併用獨立委員會及外部股東多數決的場合，法院將採取經營判斷法則審查控制股東收購行為之適法性，此一發展。值得關注。我國適逢企業併購法制修正之際，將要求公開發行公司設立特別委員會審議併購交易之公平性及合理性，我國公司法因亦課予公司負責人受託義務，故以上德拉瓦州案例法之發展將可作為思考素材，以為建構我國企業併購法制之參考。
Considering the fundamental change brought to a company in the sale of the company or the like merger and acquisition deal, it is one of the critical issues in the corporate law to balance the rights and obligations among interested parties in the event of a merger. This is concerned with the protection of shareholders as well as the need of the directors and buyers to have a set of clear rules so as to reduce the liability risk.Delaware case laws premise the law of sale of company on the concept of fiduciary duty, whose substance is comprised of duty of loyalty and duty of care, formulating the two mainstream case laws of ＂Weinberger＂ and ＂Revlon＂. It further develops the idea of the two procedural mechanisms, independent committee and majority vote of unaffiliated shareholders, and applies different standard of review according to the procedural mechanism adopted. Lately, in the ＂In re MFW Shareholders Litigation＂ and ＂Kahn, et al. v. M&F Worldwide Corp., et al.＂, the Delaware courts render that it will scrutinize the freeze-out merger by the controlling shareholder under business judgment rule if both independent committee and majority vote of unaffiliated shareholders are applied. The current draft of Taiwan Merger and Acquisition Act purports to, in the event of a merger and acquisition deal, demand listing companies to form special committee to review the fairness and reasonableness of that deal. Because Taiwan Company Act also imposes the fiduciary duty on a company's representative, the development of Delaware case laws provide inspiring guidance to establish the law of mergers and acquisitions in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.王文宇(20080300)。法律移植的契機與挑戰--以公司法的受託、注意與忠實義務為中心。月旦民商法雜誌，19，81-91。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bainbridge, Stephen M.、Lopez, Star、Oklan, Benjamin(2008)。The Convergence of Good Faith and Oversight。UCLA Law Review，55，559-605。  new window
3.Hill, Claire A.、McDonnell, Brett H.(2007)。Disney, Good Faith, and Structural Bias。Journal of Corporation Law，32(4)，833-864。  new window
4.Strine, Leo E. Jr.、Hamermesh, Lawrence A.、Balotti, R. Franklin、Gorris, Jeffrey M.(2010)。Loyalty's Core Demand: The Defining Role of Good Faith in Corporation Law。Georgetown Law Journal，93，629-696。  new window
5.Thompson, Robert B.(2010)。The Short But Interesting Life of Good Faith as an Independent Liability Rule。New York Law School Law Review，55，543-559。  new window
6.林國彬(201008)。公司法第 23 條第 1 項受任人義務之違反請求權人限於公司。台灣法學雜誌，158，170-180。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱德芳(20090900)。論股東會資訊揭露之重大性原則。月旦法學，172，40-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Strine, Leo E. Jr.(2012)。Our Continuing Struggle with the Idea that For-Profit Corporations Seek Profit。WAKE FOREST L. REV，47，135。  new window
9.陳啟垂、廖大穎(20110500)。論我國法適用「商業判斷原則」與舉證責任之分配。興大法學，9，1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.劉連煜(20110800)。企業併購時董事之受任人（受託）義務--農民銀行與合庫合併案最高法院九十九年度臺上字第二六一號判決及其歷審判決評析。月旦法學，195，225-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Julian, Velasco(2010)。How many fiduciary duties are there in corporate law?。Southern California Law Review，83(6)，1231-1307。  new window
12.Johnson, Lyman(2013)。Unsettledness in Delaware Corporate Law : Business Judgment Rule, Corporate Purpose。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，38，405。  new window
13.林國彬(20070400)。敵意併購防禦措施之研究--黃金降落傘(Golden Parachute)。萬國法律，152，9-25。  延伸查詢new window
14.章友馨(20121200)。美國控制股東「公平對待義務」之法制探源--兼論我國控制股東之濫權問題。政大法學評論，130，51-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.張心悌(20111000)。逐出少數股東--以資訊揭露義務與受託人義務為中心之美國法比較。政大法學評論，123，253-304。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.楊竹生(20041200)。論董事注意義務中監督公司業務執行之義務。中原財經法學，13，147-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Bruner, C. M.(2006)。Good faith, state of mind, and the outer boundaries of director liability in corporate law。Wake Forest Law Review，41，1131-1187。  new window
18.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2003)。Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance。Northwestern University Law Review，97(2)，547-606。  new window
19.Brudney, Victor(1997)。Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Law。Boston College Law Review，38，595-665。  new window
20.劉連煜(20100400)。現行上市上櫃公司獨立董事制度之檢討暨改進方案--從實證面出發。政大法學評論，114，53-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.曾宛如(20140300)。半套公司治理移植經驗--以審計委員會與特別委員會為例。月旦民商法雜誌，43，33-47。  延伸查詢new window
22.Hill, Claire A.、McDonnell, Brett H.(2011)。Sanitizing Interested Transactions。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，36(3)，903-938。  new window
23.方元沂(20111000)。公司負責人之忠實義務與注意義務--臺灣高等法院九十八年度臺上字第一三○七號民事判決。月旦法學，197，182-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.江朝聖(2014)。關於簡易合併的幾個問題--由美國法檢視企業併購法及其修正草案。全國律師月刊，2014(2月號)，18-35。  延伸查詢new window
25.何曜琛、方元沂(20110700)。論公司治理與獨立董事之受任人義務。華岡法粹，50，83-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.邵慶平(20150300)。投保中心代表訴訟的公益性：檢視、強化與反省。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，44(1)，223-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.周振鋒(20140915)。簡評企業併購法草案之特別委員會制度。臺灣法學雜誌，256，95-102。  延伸查詢new window
28.張心悌(20141000)。薪資報酬委員會獨立性與專業性之再思考。月旦法學，233，115-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.黃朝琮(20150100)。論公司章程管轄法院條款。法令月刊，66(1)，73-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.廖大穎(20111100)。限縮股東表決權迴避行使之適用範圍--臺灣高等法院九十三年度上字第九二八號民事判決。月旦裁判時報，11，35-46。  延伸查詢new window
31.蔡昌憲(20150600)。下市交易中利益衝突之淨化機制：從美國Dell公司收購案談起。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，44(2)，533-597。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.戴銘昇(20140701)。董事該迴避嗎？董事利益迴避的迷思！--臺灣高等法院101年度重上更（一）字第59號判決。臺灣法學雜誌，251，36-47。  延伸查詢new window
33.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2013)。The Geography of Revlon-Land。FORDHAM L. REV.，81。  new window
34.Bishop, Carter G.(2006)。A Good Faith Revival of Duty of Care Liability in Business Organization Law。TULSA L. REV.，41，479。  new window
35.Booth, Richard A.(2014)。Majority-of-the-Minority Voting and Fairness in Freezeout Mergers。VILL. L. REV. TOLLE LEGE，59，87。  new window
36.Bratton, William W.、Wachter, Michael L.(2014)。Bankers and Chancellors。TEXAS L. REV.，93，1。  new window
37.Bruner, Christopher M.(2010)。Good Faith in Revlon-Land。N. Y. L. SCH. L. REV.，55，581。  new window
38.Cain, Matthew D.、Davidoff, Steven M.(2011)。Form Over Substance? The Value Of Corporate Process And Management Buy-Out。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，36，849-902。  new window
39.Chandler, William B. III、Rickey, Anthony A.(2009)。Manufacturing Mystery: A Response to Professors Carney and Shepherd’s “The Mystery of Delaware Law’s Continuing Success”。U. ILL. L. REV.，2009，95。  new window
40.周振鋒(20130300)。Are Independent Directors Effective Monitors in Taiwan?: A Theoretical Analysis。National Taiwan University Law Review，8(1)，49-95。new window  new window
41.Fairfax, Lisa M.(2005)。Spare the Rod, Spoil the Director? Revitalizing Directors’ Fiduciary Duty Through Legal Liability。HOUS. L. REV.，42，393。  new window
42.Fairfax, Lisa M.(2010)。The Uneasy Case for the Inside Director。IOWA L. REV.，96，127。  new window
43.Furlow, Clark W.(2009)。Reflections on the Revlon Doctrine。U. PA. J. BUS. L.，11，519。  new window
44.Gevurtz, Franklin(1485)。Removing Revlon。WASH. & LEE L. REV.，70，1485。  new window
45.Gold, Andrew S.(2007)。A Decision Theory Approach to the Business Judgment Rule: Reflections on Disney, Good Faith, and Judicial Uncertainty。MD. L. REV.，66，398。  new window
46.Gold, Andrew S.(2009)。The New Concept of Loyalty in Corporate Law。U.C. DAVIS L. REV.，43，457。  new window
47.Hill, Claire A.、McDonnell, Brett H.(1769)。Stone v. Ritter and the Expanding Duty of Loyalty。FORDHAM L. REV.，76，1769。  new window
48.Chandler, William B., III、Strine, Leo E., Jr.(2003)。The new federalism of the American corporate governance system: Preliminary reflections of two residents of one small state。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，152，953-1005。  new window
49.Gilson, Ronald、Gordon, Jeffrey(2003)。Controlling Controlling Shareholders。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，152(2)，785-843。  new window
50.Hill, Claire A.、McDonnell, Brett H.(2009)。Executive Compensation and the Optimal Penumbra of Delaware Corporation Law。VA. L. & BUS. REV.，4，333-372。  new window
51.Johnson, Lyman P. Q.(1999)。Rethinking Judicial Review of Director Care。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，24，787-833。  new window
52.Johnson, Lyman(2003)。After Enron: Remembering Loyalty Discourse in Corporate Law。DEL. J. CORP. L.，28，27。  new window
53.Johnson, Lyman、Ricca, Robert(2014)。The Dwindling of Revlon。WASH. & LEE L. REV.，71。  new window
54.Lafferty, William M.、Schmidt, Lisa A.、Wolfe, Donald J., Jr.(2012)。A Brief Introduction to the Fiduciary Duties of Directors Under Delaware Law。PENN ST. L. REV.，116，837。  new window
55.Laster, J. Travis(2013)。Omnicare's Silver Lining。J. CORP. L.，38(4)，795。  new window
56.Laster, J. Travis(2013)。Revlon is a Standard of Review: Why It’s True and What It Means。FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN L.，19，5。  new window
57.Leahy, Joseph Kieran(2015)。A Decade after Disney: A Primer on Good and Bad Faith。U. CINCINATTI L. REV.，83，859。  new window
58.Lubben, Stephen J.、Darnell, Alana J.(2006)。Delaware’s Duty of Care。DEL. J. CORP. L.，31，589。  new window
59.Manesh, Mohsen(2014)。Defined By Dictum: The Geography of Revlon-Land in Cash and Mixed Consideration Transactions。VILL. L. REV.，59。  new window
60.Manesh, Mohsen(2014)。Nearing 30, Is Revlon Showing Its Age?。WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE，71，107。  new window
61.Miller, Robert T.(2012)。Del Monte and El Paso: Going to Revlon-Land With a Conflicted Financial Advisor。ISSUE，13，3。  new window
62.Restrepo, Fernán(2013)。Do Different Standards of Judicial Review Affect the Gains of Minority Shareholders in Freeze-Out Transactions? A Re-Examination of Siliconix。Harv. Bus. L. Rev.，3，321。  new window
63.Restrepo, Fernán、Subramanian, Guhan(2015)。The Effect of Delaware Doctrine on Freezeout Structure and Outcomes: Evidence on the Unified Approach。HARV. BUS. L. REV.，5，205。  new window
64.Rohrbacher, Blake、Zeberkiewicz, John Mark、Uebler, Thomas A.(2008)。Finding Safe Harbor: Clarifying the Limited Application of Section 144。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，33(3)，719-748。  new window
65.Ross, David E.、Selden, Eric D.(2013)。Managing Litigation Risk in Single-Bidder Transactions。The M&A Lawyer，17(7)，9。  new window
66.Sale, Hillary A.(2004)。Delaware’s Good Faith。CORNELL L. REV.，89，456。  new window
67.Simpson, Scott V.、Brody, Katherine(2014)。The Evolving Role of Special Committees in M&A Transactions: Seeking Business Judgment Rule Protection in the Context of Controlling Shareholder Transactions and Other Corporate Transactions Involving Conflicts of Interest。BUS. LAW.，69，1117。  new window
68.Steele, Myron T.(2007)。Judicial Scrutiny of Fiduciary Duties in Delaware Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies。DEL. J. CORP. L.，32，1。  new window
69.Strine, Leo E. Jr.(2014)。Can We Do Better by Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction to the Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law。Columbia Law Review，114(2)，449-502。  new window
70.Strine, Leo E., Jr.(2014)。Making it Easier for Directors to "Do the Right Thing”?。HARV. BUS. L. REV.，4，235。  new window
71.Strine, Leo E., Jr.(2015)。Documenting the Deal: How Quality Control and Candor Can Improve Boardroom Decision-Making and Reduce the Litigation Target Zone。BUS. LAW.，70，679。  new window
72.Velasco, Julian(2012)。The Role of Aspiration in Corporate Fiduciary Duties。WM. & MARY L. REV.，54，519。  new window
73.Rodrigues, U.(2008)。The fetishization of independence。The Journal of Corporation Law，33，447-495。  new window
74.方嘉麟(20120800)。論經營判斷法則於我國法下適用之可能--以明基併購西門子手機部門一案為例。政大法學評論，128，261-349。new window  延伸查詢new window
75.林建中(20140600)。美國德拉瓦法上股份收買請求權的計算方式與衍生問題。政大法學評論，137，99-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
76.邵慶平(20080600)。董事受託義務內涵與類型的再思考--從監督義務與守法義務的比較研究出發。臺北大學法學論叢，66，1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
77.黃朝琮(20150400)。董事違反受託義務之事前救濟。法令月刊，66(4)，115-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
78.戴志傑(20040300)。公司法上「經營判斷法則」之研究。月旦法學，106，157-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
79.蘇怡慈(20111015)。從比較法觀點看經營判斷法則移植。臺灣法學雜誌，186，80-90。  延伸查詢new window
80.Balotti, R. Franklin、Hanks, James J. Jr.(1993)。Rejudging the Business Judgment Rule。The Business Lawyer，48，1337-1353。  new window
81.Eisenberg, Melvin Aron(1993)。The Divergence of Standards of Conduct and Standards of Review in Corporate Law。Fordham Law Review，62(3)，437-468。  new window
82.Griffith, Sean J.(2013)。The Omnipresent Specter of Omnicare。Journal of Corporation Law，38(4)，753-793。  new window
83.Jacobs, Jack B.(2015)。Fifty Years of Corporate Law Evolution: A Delaware Judge's Retrospective。Harvard Business Law Review，5(2)，141-172。  new window
84.Rock, Edward B.、Kahan, Marcel(2009)。How to Prevent Hard Cases from Making Bad Law: Bear Stearns, Delaware and the Strategic Use of Comity。Emory L. J.，58，713-759。  new window
85.Kahan, Marcel、Rock, Edward B.(2011)。When the Government is the Controlling Shareholder。Texas Law Review，89，1293-1364。  new window
86.Kling, Jacob A.(2010)。Disenfranchising Shareholders: The Future of Blasius after Mercier v. Inter-Tel。The Yale Law Journal，119(8)，1750-2155。  new window
87.Laster, J. Travis(2014)。The Effect of Stockholder Approval on Enhanced Scrutiny。Wm. Mitchell L. Review，40，1443-1491。  new window
88.Siegel, Mary(2013)。The Illusion of Enhanced Review of Board Actions。University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law，15，599-668。  new window
89.Veasey, E. N.、Guglielmo, C. T. D.(2005)。What happened in Delaware corporate law and governance from 1992-2004? A retrospective on some key developments。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，153，1399-1512。  new window
90.Rock, Edward B.、Wachter, Michael L.(2001)。Islands of Conscious Power: Law, Norms, and the Self-governing Corporation。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，149(6)，1619-1700。  new window
91.Coates, John C.(1999)。Fair Value as an Avoidable Rule of Corporate Law: Minority Discount in Conflict Transactions。University Pennsylvania Law Review，147，1251-1359。  new window
92.李維心(20090600)。從實務觀點談商業判斷法則之引進。中原財經法學，22，129-211。new window  延伸查詢new window
93.Holland, Randy J.(2009)。Delaware Directors' Fiduciary Duties: The Focus on Loyalty。University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law，11(3)，675-702。  new window
94.林國彬(20071200)。董事忠誠義務與司法審查標準之研究--以美國德拉瓦州公司法為主要範圍。政大法學評論，100，135-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
95.蔡昌憲(20130300)。從經濟觀點論企業風險管理與董事監督義務。中研院法學期刊，12，79-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
96.邵慶平(20110600)。商業判斷原則的角色與適用--聯電案的延伸思考。科技法學評論，8(1)，103-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
97.劉連煜(20070900)。董事責任與經營判斷法則。月旦民商法雜誌，17，178-196。  延伸查詢new window
98.Griffith, Sean J.、Lahav, Alexandra D.(2013)。The market for preclusion in merger litigation。Vanderbilt Law Review，66(4)，1053-1138。  new window
99.Rock, Edward B.(1997)。Saints and Sinners: How Does Delaware Corporate Law Work?。UCLA Law Review，44，1009-1108。  new window
100.蔡昌憲、陳乃瑜(20120400)。內部控制制度、董事監督義務及薪資報酬委員會--評最高法院九十八年度臺上字第一三○二號民事判決。月旦法學，203，200-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
101.陳俊仁(20050600)。由企業併購法第五條與第六條論我國忠實義務規範的缺失。華岡法粹，33，203-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
102.曾宛如(20020900)。董事忠實義務之內涵及適用疑義--評析新修正公司法第二十三條第一項。臺灣本土法學雜誌，38，51-66。  延伸查詢new window
103.劉連煜(20120200)。敵意併購下目標公司董事的受任人（受託）義務--以開發金控敵意併購金鼎證券為例。政大法學評論，125，1-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
104.郭大維(20100600)。論敵意併購下目標公司董事之義務與司法審查標準--我國法與美國法之比較研究。輔仁法學，39，49-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
105.林國彬(20090900)。敵意併購防禦措施之研究--以財務性防禦措施中之毒藥丸為主要範圍。臺北大學法學論叢，71，81-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
106.林國彬(20130900)。公司出售或控制權出售時之股東利益最大化原則--論德拉瓦州法院Revlon/QVC Doctrine之適用範圍。臺北大學法學論叢，87，119-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
107.張心悌(20071200)。控制股東與關係人交易。臺灣本土法學雜誌，101(特刊)，76-99。  延伸查詢new window
108.游啟璋(20140300)。現金逐出合併時少數股東的股份收買請求權。政大法學評論，136，209-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
109.蔡昌憲(20121200)。從內控制度及風險管理之國際規範趨勢論我國的公司治理法制：兼論董事監督義務之法律移植。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，41(4)，1819-1896。new window  延伸查詢new window
110.Alien, William T.、Jacobs, Jack B.、Strine, Leo E. Jr.(2001)。Function Over Form: A Reassessment of Standards of Reviewin Delaware Corporation Law。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，26(3)，859-895。  new window
111.Rock, Edward B.(2012)。Shareholder eugenics in the public corporation。Cornell Law Review，97(4)，849-906。  new window
112.Horsey, Henry Ridgely(1994)。The Duty of Care Component of the Delaware Business Judgment Rule。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，19(3)，971-971。  new window
113.Veasey, E. Norman(1990)。Counseling Directors on the Duty of Loyalty and the Use of Special Committee。Delaware Lawyer，8(1)，30-30。  new window
114.Griffith, Sean J.(2005)。Good Faith Business Judgment: A Theory of Rhetoric in Corporate Law Jurisprudence。Duke Law Journal，55，1。  new window
115.Eisenberg, Melvin A.(2006)。The Duty of Good Faith in Corporate Law。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，31，1。  new window
116.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye、Hamdani, Assaf(2002)。Vigorous Race or Leisurely Walk: Reconsidering the Competition over Corporate Charters。Yale Law Journal，112，553-556。  new window
117.Subramanian, Guhan(2007)。Post-Siliconix Freeze-Outs: Theory and Evidence。J. LEGAL STUD.，36，1。  new window
會議論文
1.林郁馨(2013)。從美國法論獨立董事獨立性之法律規制。公司治理法制學術研討會，國立政治大學公司治理法律研究中心主辦 。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭大維(2013)。從公司治理角度論我國股東代表訴訟制度。公司治理法制學術研討會，國立政治大學公司治理法律研究中心主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.方嘉麟、朱慈蘊、朱德芳、沈朝暉、陳肇鴻、張憲初、楊東、藍璐璐(2014)。管理階層收購法律規範理論與實務。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾宛如(2011)。公司法制基礎理論之再建構。曾宛如。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Grossbauer, John F.、Reilly, Michael K.(2009)。Special Committees: A Primer。  new window
4.劉連煜(2009)。現代公司法。台北：新學林。  延伸查詢new window
5.Balloti, R. Franklin、Finkelstein, Jesse A.(2014)。The Delaware Law of Corporations and Business Organizations。WestlawNext。  new window
6.Holland, Justice Rand J.、陳春山(2011)。美國公司法--德拉瓦州公司法經典案例選輯。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Coates. John C., IV(2005)。An Empirical Reassessment of MBO Bids: Techniques, Outcomes, and Delaware Corporate Law，http://web.law.columbia.edu/law-economic-studies/workshops/fall-2005-workshops， 2015/08/31。  new window
其他
1.Gerstein, Mark D.，Faris, Bradley C.(2012)。Special Negotiation Committees: If, When, Who and How - A Guide for the General Counsel，http://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/special-negotiating-committees， 2015/08/31。  new window
2.Koumrian, Olga(2015)。Shareholder Litigation Involving Acquisitions of Public Companies - Review of 2014 M & A Litigation，https://www.cornerstone.com/GetAttachment/897c61ef-bfde-46e6-a2b8-5f94906c6ee2/Shareholder-Litigation-Involving-Acquisitions-2014-Review.pdf。  new window
3.Lefkowitz, Jay P.(2013)。Director Independence: Interplay Between Delaware Law and Exchange Rules，http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2013/10/07/director-independenceinterplay-between-delaware-law-and-exchange-rules， 2015/08/31。  new window
4.Lewkow, Victor，Klingsberg, Ethan，Whoriskey, Neil(2013)。Be Wary of the Path to the Business Judgment Rule，http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/be-wary-of-the-path-to-the-business-judgment-rule， 2015/08/31。  new window
5.Morton, Mark A.，Houtman, Roxanne L.(2008)。Go-Shops: Market Check Magic or Mirage?，http://www.potteranderson.com/publication/go-shops-market-check-magic-or-mirage， 2014/02/09。  new window
6.Smith, D. Gordon(2015)。The Modern Business Judgment Rule，http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2620536， 2015/08/31。  new window
7.Tumas, Michael B.，Reilly, Michael K.(2008)。Rethinking the Blasius Standard of Review: The Implications of Mercier v. Inter-Tel (Delaware), Inc.，http://www.potteranderson.com/publication/rethinking-the-blasius-standard-of-review-the-implications-of-mercier-v-inter-tel-delaware-inc， 2015/08/31。  new window
8.Strine, Leo E. Jr.(2015)。The Dangers of Denial: The Need for a Clear-Eyed Understanding of the Power and Accountability Structure Established by the Delaware General Corporation Law，http://ssrn.com/abstract=2576389， 2015/08/31。  new window
圖書論文
1.劉連煜(2009)。股東及董事因自身利害關係迴避表決權之研究--從台新金控併購彰化銀行談起。公司法理論與判決研究。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1217（臺灣：1204，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67555218
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上