:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:哀成叔鼎銘文新考
書刊名:中國文學研究
作者:黃庭頎 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Ting-chi
出版日期:2016
卷期:41
頁次:頁41-66
主題關鍵詞:青銅器銘文金文哀成叔鼎BronzeInscriptionCharacter
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:37
本文主要針對1966年出土於洛陽之《哀成叔鼎》銘文重新進行考察,利用新出土文物,對銘文提出新的理解與詮釋方式。本文所提出觀點如下:第一,銘文句讀部分,主張《哀成叔鼎》銘文可能無法照銘文原順序理解,原銘作「少去母父,作鑄飤器黃鑊」,認為當將「作鑄飤器黃鑊」移至「嘉是隹哀成叔」之後,讀作「嘉是隹哀成叔,作鑄飤器黃鑊」。第二,人物關係部分,通過傳世文獻與春秋金文文例之比對,本文主張「哀成叔」未必是諡號,也有可能是別稱。除此之外,器銘所見之「君」頗受作器者「嘉」之稱讚,本文認為「君」應當即是哀成叔。第三,銘辭考釋部分,本文主張「□蒦」一詞宜通假為《禮記》之「固獲」,乃指不廉正、爭取專固,主要用以形容哀成叔的溫恭舒遲、正直有節操之貴族姿態。第四,銘文「尸于下土」,本文主張「尸」訓為「陳」,指陳設、陳列之意,而「尸于下土」之主詞當是哀成叔鼎,而非過往學者所認為之哀成叔。第五,本文根據「嘉是隹哀成叔」之「嘉」具有上對下稱許之意味,認為作器者「嘉」與哀成叔當是上下關係,而此種關係說明「嘉」的身分地位極高,其較可能的論斷,乃是「嘉」為鄭康公之後。故此推知,《哀成叔鼎》製作年代當屬於戰國早期,而且作於鄭國覆滅之後
This paper mainly re-examines the "哀成叔鼎" inscription unearthed in Luoyang in 1966 by utilizing new archaeological findings to propose new ways of understanding and interpretation for the study of inscriptions. This paper proposes that, first, the inscription should not be read according to its original syntax; instead, the original "少去母父,作鑄飤器黃鑊" should be read as "嘉是隹哀成叔,作鑄飤器黃鑊," with "嘉是隹哀成叔" inserted before "作鑄飤器黃鑊." Second, concerning the relationship between characters mentioned in the inscription, this paper argues that "哀成叔" may not necessarily be a posthumous title but an epithet based on a comparison of historical documents and Jin inscription in the Spring and Autumn period. In addition, this paper argues that the "君" who is praised by "嘉" the device maker in the inscription refers to 哀成叔. Third, regarding the interpretation of inscriptions, the paper advocates that "□蒦" should be regarded as equivalents of the phrase "固獲", which means obstinate integrity, as is used in Liji, and should be understood as a reference to 哀成叔's gentle temperament, solid integrity, and noble moral principles. Fourth, regarding the "尸于下土" inscription, this paper argues that "尸" should be understood as "display," as in displaying furnishings. Furthermore, the subject of "尸于下土" should be 哀成叔鼎 and not the commonly assumed 哀成叔. Fifth, since the " 嘉是隹哀成叔" inscription implies that "Ka" has given commendations to 哀成叔, this paper considers "Ka" as superior to 哀成叔 in terms of social status. Accordingly, "Ka" may most likely have been an offspring of 鄭康公. Therefore, we may infer that 哀成叔鼎 was made in the early years of the Warring States period, posterior to the destruction of Zheng
期刊論文
1.林清源(20020300)。欒書缶的年代、國別與器主。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,73(1),1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李義海(2003)。哀成叔鼎銘文續考。漳州師範學院學報(哲學社會科學版),2003(4),61-63。  延伸查詢new window
3.李建西、李延祥(2010)。銅料名稱「金膚鋁」考。江漢考古,2010(2)=115,124-130。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭憲仁(20020300)。哀成叔諸器研究。東方人文學誌,1(1),35-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.趙振華(1981)。哀成叔鼎的銘文與年代。文物,1981(7),68-69。  延伸查詢new window
6.洛陽博物館(1981)。洛陽哀成叔墓清理簡報。文物,1981(7),65-67。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡運章(1985)。哀成叔鼎銘考釋。中原文物,1985(4),56-62。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李學勤(20071100)。東周與秦代文明。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱駿聲(1998)。說文通訓定聲。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱彬、饒欽農(2007)。禮記訓纂。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.王先謙(2012)。詩三家義疏。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳英傑(2007)。西周金文作器用途銘辭研究。北京:線裝書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬承源(2005)。上海博物館藏戰國楚簡。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔣見元、程俊英(2009)。詩經注析。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.彭裕商(1983)。嘉鼎銘文考釋。西安:考古與文物編輯部。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊伯峻(1982)。春秋左傳注。源流文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李學勤(1990)。考古發現與東周王都。新出青銅器研究。北京:文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李學勤(2010)。鄭人金文兩種對讀。通向文明之路。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.林巳奈夫(1989)。春秋戰國時代文化の基礎編年。春秋戰國時代青銅器の研究。東京:吉川弘文館。  延伸查詢new window
4.張政烺(2012)。哀成叔鼎釋文。甲骨金文與商周史研究。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.裘錫圭(2012)。戎生編鐘銘文考釋。裘錫圭學術文集:金文及其他古文字卷。上海:復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.何樹環(2013)。金文「??」字別解--兼及「惠」。青銅器與西周史論集。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE