:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:十二年國教免試入學分發制度之賽局分析
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:袁國芝 引用關係王子豪莊委桐 引用關係
作者(外文):Yuan, Kuo-chihWang, Tzu-haoJuang, Wei-torng
出版日期:2016
卷期:44:2
頁次:頁215-255
主題關鍵詞:國教分發制度賽局均衡Compulsory educationAssignment mechanismGameNash equilibrium
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:16
台灣於2014年開始實施十二年國教。其中分發制度的志願序設計是引發學生和家長爭議的主要焦點之一。本文建立一個十二年國教分發制度下的簡化賽局模型,比較納入志願序作為入學比序依據的新制,以及傳統填志願依成績分發的舊制。我們首先描述學生可能的因應策略,並刻劃在新舊分發制度下的純策略均衡。接著我們以一個典型的混合均衡為例,分別說明在新制下可能的長期均衡結果。我們發現, 最好的學生不受影響,然後大致上會依照成績由優至劣對學生產生由弊至利的各種影響。另外,學校錄取的學生組成會更多樣化,成績較差的學生開始有可能進入第一志願的學校,並且缺額的情況將可能出現在傳統分發制度下從來不會發生的學校。
The government in Taiwan implemented 12-year compulsory education in 2014. Among its several measures, the newly adopted student assignment mechanism caused intense debate in Taiwan. In this paper, we construct a model in which students submit their school choices and characterize the pure Nash equilibria under both the new and the original system. We then provide an example with a typical mixed equilibrium to illustrate its welfare and efficiency outcome. We find that, under the new system, the best students are not affected while the second-tier students lose and the last-tier students gain. Under the new system, schools will be more likely to admit students from all tiers, although all schools may have vacancies now that only occurred in the least preferred schools under the old system.
期刊論文
1.Gale, David、Shapley, Lloyd S.(1962)。College admissions and the stability of marriage。American Mathematical Monthly,69(1),9-15。  new window
2.Roth, Alvin E.(1982)。The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives。Mathematics of Operational Research,7,617-628。  new window
3.Pathak, Parag A.、Sönmez, Tayfun(2013)。School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by their Vulnerability to Manipulation。American Economic Review,103,80-106。  new window
4.Pais, Joana、Pintér, Ágnes(2008)。School Choice and Information: An Experimental Study on Matching Mechanisms。Games and Economic Behavior,64,303-328。  new window
5.Klijn, Flip、Pais, Joana、Vorsatz, Marc(2013)。Preference Intensities and Risk Aversion in School Choice: A Laboratory Experiment。Experimental Economics,16,1-22。  new window
6.Dubins, Lester E.、Freedman, David A.(1981)。Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm。American Mathematical Monthly,88,485-494。  new window
7.Chen, Yan、Sönmez, Tayfun(2006)。School Choice: An Experimental Study。Journal of Economic Theory,127,202-231。  new window
8.Calsamiglia, Caterina、Haeringer, Guillaume、Klijn, Flip(2010)。Constrained School Choice: An Experimental Study。American Economic Review,100,1860-1874。  new window
9.Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila、Sönmez, Tayfun(2003)。Social Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach。American Economic Review,93,729-747。  new window
10.Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila、Che, Yeon-Koo、Yasuda, Yosuke(2011)。Resolving Conflicting Preferences in School Choice: The "Boston" Mechanism Reconsidered。American Economic Review,101,399-410。  new window
11.王韻齡(2014)。填志願的4個必勝策略。親子天下,56,114-118。  延伸查詢new window
12.Pathak, Parag A.、Sönmez, Tayfun(2008)。Leveling the paying Field: Sincere and Sophisticated Players in the Boston Mechanism。American Economic Review,98,1636-1652。  new window
單篇論文
1.Featherstone, Clayton R.,Niederle, Muriel(2011)。School Choice Mechanisms under Incomplete Information: An Experimental Investigation。  new window
其他
1.教育部十二年國民基本教育專案辦公室。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫:您關心的議題,http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=229。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部十二年國民基本教育專案辦公室。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫:理念與目標,http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=43。  延伸查詢new window
3.自由時報(2014)。二免放榜 全國近5 萬個缺額/基北12 校將辦續招,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/804789, 2014/08/15。  延伸查詢new window
4.自由時報(2014)。質疑教育局黑箱決議志願序 北市家長團體抗議,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1131737, 2014/10/15。  延伸查詢new window
5.中央通訊社(2014)。基北區免試入學 自創積點制,http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aedu/201409260355-1.aspx, 2014/09/26。  延伸查詢new window
6.中國時報(2014)。扯! 循二免管道會考零分上成功高中,http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140820000365-260114, 2014/08/20。  延伸查詢new window
7.中央通訊社(2014)。志願序一路扣 4A++六級分落榜,http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/201406200301-1.aspx, 2014/06/20。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila(2013)。School Choice。The Handbook of Market Design。Oxford:University of Oxford。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top