:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「家事商談服務使用者的經驗探討」--以兒盟家事商談服務為例
書刊名:臺灣社會工作學刊
作者:李惠娟邱雅芳
作者(外文):Lee, Hui-chuanChiu, Ya-fang
出版日期:2015
卷期:15
頁次:頁81+83-110
主題關鍵詞:離婚家事商談監護探視未成年子女照顧計畫DivorceFamily mediationCustodyVisitationParenting plan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:122
因父母離婚造成家庭重組,必須重新適應新的生活,如何妥善照顧未成年子女,成為重要議題。兒盟自2003 年開始提供社區家事商談服務,倡議好聚好散共擔親職的觀念,以治療派家事商談模式進行服務。本研究訪談五位接受過服務的離婚父母,從使用者經驗勾勒家事商談的服務樣貌,包括:其商談過程中遭遇的困境與改變,以及對商談的看法與建議。結果發現家事商談社工的角色主要在於協助離婚父母理性溝通子女後續照顧,並緩和雙方衝突,也提供充足專業資訊,且隨時提醒父母親職義務,期保障未成年子女之權益。最後,未來服務可思考如何降低商談門檻,並建議國內應發展社區家事商談服務,培育商談服務人力,調整離婚制度,以保障離婚子女的權益。
Five divorced parents were interviewed in the research. Based on their experiences of using family mediation service, the research outlines the nature of family mediation, including the changes and difficulties they have encountered during the process, as well as their thoughts and suggestions to family mediation service. The results indicated that the mediator has helped divorced parents to calmly discuss their parenting plan; facilitated to retain the parent-child relationship after divorce; mitigated the conflicts from both sides; provided adequate professional information and further protected minor children's rights and interests. Finally, it is recommended that the following considerations can be taken in the near future, such as lower the threshold of offering mediation service; finding suitable timing to provide mediation service and assisting the facilitation of mediation agreement. It was also suggested that the local authority should advocate the policies of developing mediation service within the community; proposing further recruitment in family mediation service; carrying out pre-marriage education and supplying parenting education for divorced parents.
期刊論文
1.劉宏恩(20120615)。臺灣離婚調解制度的演變--兼論家事事件法關於調解程序的若干疑問。臺灣法學雜誌,202,35-46。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳伶珠、盧佳香(20060100)。以法院為基礎的社會工作家事調解歷程之初探。臺灣社會工作學刊,5,75+77-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.賴月蜜(20090600)。香港、臺灣家事調解制度比較研究--以家庭暴力事件為中心。人文及社會科學集刊,21(2),247-289。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Emery, R. E.、Sbarra, D.、Grover, T.(2005)。Divorce Mediation: Research and Reflections。Family Court Review,43(1),22-37。  new window
5.Garcia, L. M. R.(2013)。Family Mediation: Competencies for Social Work Training。Journal of Conflictology,4(1),44-51。  new window
6.Kitzmann, K. M.、Emery, R. E.(1994)。Child and Family Coping One Year After Mediated and Litigated Child Custody Disputes。Journal of Family Psychological,8(2),150-159。  new window
7.Kruk, E.(1993)。Promoting Co-operative Parenting After Separation: A Therapeutic/interventionist Model of Family Mediation。Journal of Family Therapy,15(3),235-261。  new window
會議論文
1.賴月蜜(2005)。遙迢艱辛路從調解到商談--兒盟推動家事商談服務的經驗分享與成效初探。家事商談實務國際研討會,長榮大學主辦 。台南。  延伸查詢new window
2.藍瀛芳(2003)。國外調解制度介紹。調解制度與司法改革研討會,亞洲之友會、台灣大學法律學院、民間司法改革基金會主辦 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴月蜜(2004)。家事商談制度之介紹。家事商談研討會。台北:內政部統計處兒童局。14-50。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gibson, D.(2001)。Mediation and Family Law in Australia。Growth and Integration-International Conference on NPO and Child Welfare in the 21th Century。台北。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部(2014)。103年第29週內政統計通報。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部戶政司(2015)。人口資料庫之離婚對數按離婚方式(按發生)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊子瑩(2011)。家事調解當事人的滿意度研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.林春華(2013)。終身家長契約?未同住家長認知子女扶養義務之研究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉齊珠(2009)。家事調解當事人對家事調解經驗之探索性研究--以臺中地方法院為例(碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
4.賴瓊華(2010)。不同屋簷下如何作媽媽--非同住母親之親職樣貌初探(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王唯馨(2005)。家事調解員的調解策略與調解經驗之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Parkinson, Lisa(1997)。Family Mediation。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
2.財團法人兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2013)。弱勢單親家庭生活現況調査報告--以兒福聯盟單親服務經驗為例。台北:兒童福利聯盟基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Irving, Howard H.、萇英麗、王振福、袁菊花(2005)。家事調解--適用於華人家庭的理論與實踐。香港:香港大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘淑滿(2003)。質性理論與應用。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.Goldenberg, H.、Golderberg, I.(1998)。Couseling Today’s Families。CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
6.Liebmann, M.(2000)。Mediation in context。Jessica Kingsleys。  new window
7.Piper, C.(1993)。The Responsible Parent-- A study of Divorce Mediation。Harvester Wheatsheaf。  new window
8.Stevenson, M. R.、Black, K. N.(1995)。How Divorce Affects Offspring: A Research Approach。Wm. C. Brown Communication, Inc。  new window
9.Taylor, A.、楊康臨、鄭維瑄(2007)。家庭衝突處理--家事調解理論與實務。台北:學富。  延伸查詢new window
10.Clapp, G.(2000)。Divorce & new beginnings: A complete guide to recovery, solo parenting, co-parenting, and stepfamilies。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
11.Teyber, E.(2001)。Helping Children Cope with Divorce。IN:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.司法院(2000)。近五年訟源消長之探討,http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/l_source5.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.司法院(2011)。100年司法院暨所屬各機關業務提要分析,http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/l_r10012.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.謝龍騰(2010)。家事調解模式簡介。香港家事題解専業手冊。香港公教婚姻輔導會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fischer, R. L.(1997)。The Impact of an Educational Seminar for Divorcing Parents: Results from a National Survey of Family Court Judges。Child Custody: Legal Decisions and Family Outcomes。New York:The Haworth Press, Inc.。  new window
3.Salius, J. A.、Maruzo, D. S.(1988)。Mediation of Child Custody and Visitation Disputes in a Court Setting。Divorce Mediation: Theory and Practice。The Guilford Press。  new window
4.Drapkin, R.、Bienenfeld, F.(1985)。The Power of Including Children in Custody Mediation。Divorce Mediation-Perspectives on the Field。New York:The Haworth Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE