As to the increase of the cross-border civil disputes, at the end of the last century, the Ministry of Justice of Japan endeavored into the amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure (the “CCP”) to expedite the litigation proceedings and avoid wasting too much time/labor on the allegation/defense against the jurisdiction issue and then set forth the specific provisions for the International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction. Several drafts of the CCP were provided during the process of several reviews and negotiations. The amendment of the CCP was finalized and enacted in April of 2012. As our geographic location and legal system are similar to Japan, Japanese research in this connection might worthily become our reference. In addition, according to the rationale of the indirect jurisdiction, the principle of Japanese recognition of the International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction might also influence the Taiwanese judgments to be recognized and enforced in Japan. It is necessary to pay attention to the status of the Japanese legislation in question. Firstly, this thesis will introduce the background and purpose of the Japanese legislation regarding the International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction. Secondly, it will discuss each new article stated in the Japanese CCP regarding the International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction. Finally, it will analyze the current status of International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction in Taiwan and then refer to Japanese regime for further review along with the discussion of the application and development for Special circumstance theory in Taiwan to provide our legislation with the reference in the future.