:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「陶瓷品再創作」於藝術與設計的表徵、意義與發展脈絡
書刊名:設計學報
作者:馬睿平 引用關係黃娜玲
作者(外文):Ma, Jui-pingHwang, Naling
出版日期:2017
卷期:22:1
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:陶瓷品再創作藝術與設計CeramicsRe-creationArt and design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
古代中國是世界上最早擁有先進陶瓷製作技術及陶瓷文化發展最成熟的國家之一,但在過去量產技術不發達的年代裡,先民對於破損陶瓷生活用品,仍秉持愛物惜物的美德,竭盡所能的加以修補使其能恢復功能,因而發展出修補、結合破損陶瓷品的技藝。近年來,有創作者開始嘗試將破、舊陶瓷品作為構成元素,並結合多樣技巧、多元材質、手法進行全新觀點的藝術與設計再創作,但關於此領域的發展卻尚未有系統性的研究,緣此,本研究即以陶瓷品於藝術與設計上的再創作為課題,藉由紮根理論、社會網絡分析等方法,搭配現有創作品為分析文本,探究、解析創作品其表徵與意義,進而歸納其發展脈絡,以供後續相關研究者參考。研究成果整理如下:1.統整出「陶瓷品再創作」作品在使用素材、創作手法、創作理念及作品評論上的樣貌;2.探索出「陶瓷品再創作」主題於創作理念、使用材質、創作手法之間的社會網絡關係;3.導引出一個「陶瓷品再創作」在創作發展議題中的整體脈絡框架,供後續研究及創作者的參考。
The ancient China is the one of the earliest areas that owned advanced ceramic production technology and mature ceramic cultural development in the world. Yet, in the past era when the technology of mass production was not developed, ancestors treasured damaged ceramic articles for daily purpose, clinging to the moral excellence of thrift and care for things around and doing everything they can to restore their functions, and developed the repair technology united with the damaged ceramic art. Lately, some creators began to take breakage ceramics as constituting elements, blended with various skills, multiple materials, methods to create novel ideas of artistic creation and design. Because there are not enough studies with systemic methods for the maturation of this region, this study adopts grounded theory, social network analysis with the existing ceramics works to explore its manifestations and significance, and resumed the development of reprocessing in the graphics and design. The findings are as follows: (1) "ceramics reusing" issues in the use of material, technique, creative thoughts, and commentaries on works are generalized; (2) the "ceramics reusing" issues on the social network relationship between material, technique and creative concept are explored; (3) an overall contextual framework of "ceramics reusing" within the growing topic of creation and point of some possibilities for further inquiry is offered.
期刊論文
1.Oyserman, D.、Sorensen, N.、Reber, R.、Chen, S. X.(2009)。Connecting and separating mind - sets: Culture as situated cognition。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,97(2),217-235。  new window
2.Oliva, A.、Torralba, A.(2007)。The role of context in object recognition。Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(12),520-527。  new window
3.Morse, Janice M.(1991)。Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation。Nursing research,40(2),120-123。  new window
4.Smith, E. R.、Semin, G. R.(2007)。Situated social cognition。Current Directions in Psychological Science,16(3),132-135。  new window
5.Beisner, B. A.、Jackson, M. E.、Cameron, A. N.、McCowan, B.(2011)。Detecting instability in animal social networks: Genetic fragmentation is associated with social instability in rhesus macaques。PloS one,6(1),e16365。  new window
6.Beisner, B. A.、Jackson, M. E.、Cameron, A. N.、McCowan, B.(2011)。Effects of natal male alliances on aggression and power dynamics in rhesus macaques。American Journal of Primatology,73(8),790-801。  new window
7.Dunbar, R. I. M.、Shultz, S.(2010)。Bondedness and sociality。Behaviour,147,775-803。  new window
8.Flack, J. C.、Krakauer, D. C.、de Waal, F. B. M.(2005)。Robustness mechanisms in primate societies: A perturbation study。Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences,272(1568),1091-1099。  new window
9.Flack, J. C.、Girvan, M.、de Waal, F. B. M.、Krakauer, D. C.(2006)。Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates。Nature,439(7075),426-429。  new window
10.Lusseau, D.(2007)。Evidence for social role in a dolphin social network。Evolutionary Ecology,21(3),357-366。  new window
11.McCowan, B.、Anderson, A.、Heagarty, A.、Cameron, A.(2008)。Utility of social network analysis for primate behavioral management and well-being。Applied Animal Behaviour Science,109(2),396-405。  new window
12.McCowan, B.、Beisner, B. A.、Capitanio, J. P.、Jackson, M. E.、Cameron, A. N.、Seil, S.、Atwill, E. R.、Fushing, H.(2011)。Network stability is a balancing act of personality, power, and conflict dynamics in rhesus macaque societies。PloS one,6(8),e22350。  new window
13.方玉瑞(2007)。古玩行民間傳統絕活。收藏界,64,75。  延伸查詢new window
14.廖淑鳳(2011)。吹進天母的藝術種子。La Vie雜誌,87,92。  延伸查詢new window
15.Corbin, J. M.、Strauss, A. L.(1990)。Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria。Qualitative Sociology,13(1),3-21。  new window
16.Markus, Hazel R.、Kitayama, Shinobu(1991)。Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation。Psychological Review,98(2),224-253。  new window
圖書
1.Glaser, Barney G.(1998)。Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions。Sociology Press。  new window
2.Scott, J.(2000)。Social network analysis: A handbook。Sage Publications。  new window
3.Borgatti, S. P.(2002)。NetDraw network visualization。Analytic Technologies。  new window
4.Strauss, A.、Corbin, J.、吳芝儀、廖梅花(2004)。紮根理論研究方法。嘉義:濤石。  延伸查詢new window
5.林慧貞、遲久文、鄭建榮(2005)。亞太地區國際現代陶藝邀請展專輯。新北市:新北市立鶯歌陶瓷博物館。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳春蘭(20142014)。臺灣國際陶藝雙年展專刊:新陶時代--藝術•設計•數位趨勢。新北市:新北市立鶯歌陶瓷博物館。  延伸查詢new window
7.Creswell, John W.、Plano Clark, Vicki L.(2007)。Designing and conducting mixed methods research。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.Dorn, L.(20160105)。Laughing Squid,http://laughingsquid.com/gorgeous-flowers-sculptures-created-with-thousands-of-blue-and-white-porcelain-shards/。  new window
2.Hackenberg, G.(2016014)。Gesine hackenberg jewellery between objects and wearable pieces,http://www.gesinehackenberg.com/?id=10。  new window
3.林逸欣(2015)。艾未未英倫特展報導(一) 從「艾未未」回歸艾未未,http://artouch.com/artouch2/content.aspx?aid=2015111011491&catid=01。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20160103)。巴黎艾未未藝術作品展"交錯互動"/巴黎動態,http://boxun.com/news/gb/intl/2012/02/201202211035.shtml#.VKNBh14Bds。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Smith, E. R.、Conrey, F. R.(2009)。The social context of cognition。The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Stern, P.(1994)。Eroding grounded theory。Critical issues in qualitative research methods。Sage Publications。  new window
3.Kitayama, S.、Imada, T.(2010)。Implicit independence and interdependence: A cultural task analysis。The mind in context。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top