:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:吳世尚《莊子》評點研究
書刊名:彰化師大國文學誌
作者:楊菁 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Ching
出版日期:2017
卷期:34
頁次:頁51-95
主題關鍵詞:吳世尚莊子解評點以儒解莊Wu ShishangZhuangzijieCommentaryExplanation of Zhuangzi under the Confucian frame
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:3
在明清小說、戲曲評點的風氣下,也出現了一批為《莊子》評點的文章,他們致力於《莊子》散文特色的分析、評述,使《莊子》散文的藝術性得以被重視,吳世尚《莊子解》即是其中之一。此書亦深受時文評點之影響,包括思想方面以程朱理學詮解經義及形式上重視文章之「法」,都可以看出此書之評點受時代學術風氣及科舉考試之影響,由此觀點,亦可視此書為具時代特色的解《莊》作品
Literary commentaries is popular over the field of novel and drama during Mingand Qing-Dynasty and involved in the field of philosophy later which Zhuangzi is included. The importance of prose esthetics of Zhuangzi was noted after being seriously commented and analyzed by many academic writings which Wu Shishang's Zhuangzijie is one of them. Wu was greatly affected by the commentaries of essays which is for obtaining official qualification and paid too much attention on investigating the grammar of essays. Wu’s Zhuangzijie revealed that how Zhuangzi made a sentence, how Zhuangzi organized the order of all chapters and what kind of words are Zhuangzi's favorite. Wu also suggested that how Zhuangzi was written and gave one introduction for each chapter which became a good guidelines for readers. Due to the trend of highly valuing Confucianism at that time, Wu inevitably explained the philosophy of Zhuangzi under the Confucian frame and thus received lots of insults. However, Wu’s contributions still deserves praise
期刊論文
1.蒲彥光(20090300)。談八股文如何詮釋經典。臺北大學中文學報,6,139-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.關愛和(2004)。義法說:桐城派古文藝術論的起點和基石。文藝研究,2004(6),66-73。  延伸查詢new window
3.錢奕華(2011)。明清莊學中解構、建構與詮釋。寧夏師範學院學報,32(1),35-43。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘貞清(2010)。劉辰翁評點《莊子》的幾個概念。大眾文藝,2010(12,173-174。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉毓慶(2007)。林雲銘的文學生命意識及其散文評點研究。中國文學研究,2007(3),92-112。  延伸查詢new window
6.林俞佑(20111200)。科舉與時文--論清代科舉評點的社會意義。史學彙刊,2011(2)=28,155-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李衛軍(2010)。略論桐城三祖之文道觀。船山學刊,2010(4)=78,167-169。  延伸查詢new window
8.李程(2006)。論嚴復《老子評點》的發展變化觀。殷都學刊,2006(3),108-110。  延伸查詢new window
9.李波(2011)。劉辰翁《莊子》散文評點略論。內江師範學院學報,26(21),61-63。  延伸查詢new window
10.李波(2006)。評點視野下的林希逸《莊子》散文研究。重慶社會科學,2006(1)=143,59-62。  延伸查詢new window
11.何天杰(2001)。經世之學的蛻變與桐城文派的崛起。華南師範大學學報(社會科學版),2001(1),58-66。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.邢青會(2013)。吳世尚《莊子解》評點研究(碩士論文)。河南大學,鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.葉龍(1998)。桐城派文學藝術欣賞。香港:繁榮出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉朗(1994)。中國小說美學。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱熹(1986)。朱子語類。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.林乾(1997)。金聖歎評點才子全集。北京:光明日報。  延伸查詢new window
5.章學誠、葉瑛(198409)。文史通義校注。台北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.李波(2013)。清代《莊子》散文評點研究。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.戴名世(1995)。南山集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.方苞(1979)。欽定四書文。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.方苞(1976)。方望溪全集。臺北:河洛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.林雲銘、秦鼎、東條保(1975)。標註補義莊子因。臺北:蘭臺書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.吳世尚(1974)。莊子解。臺北:藝文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳世尚(1997)。莊子解。臺南:莊嚴文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.馬端臨(1983)。文獻通考。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.郎擎霄(1974)。莊子學案。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.方勇(2008)。莊子學史。人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.莊子、郭象、郭慶藩、王孝魚(1987)。莊子集釋。華正。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE