:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:談八股文如何詮釋經典
書刊名:臺北大學中文學報
作者:蒲彥光
作者(外文):Pu, Yen-kuang
出版日期:2009
卷期:6
頁次:頁139-170
主題關鍵詞:八股文時文經典教育詮釋Ba-Gu-writingExamination essaysThe classical educationInterpretation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:99
明清時期盛行五百多年的經義文(八股文),其文體定制於明初,風行於清代。這種新興文體後來不但發展出繁複的寫作技法,其解經時所重新萃取、建構之義理層面,也具有經典詮釋學的研究價值。八股文之重構經義,一方面固是揉和了寫作者個人對於章句的理解,另一方面也可以見到後世經史子集日漸融涉、互相發明的理趣。就八股文如何詮釋經義的作法上,本文從兩個層面來觀察:其一,是對於經註的依循理解;其二,是如何將切身體會加以表述的過程。就前者而言,八股文對於經註之依違,文中揭出三點:(一)對於經註的恪遵;(二)由多讀書到「以經解經」的保留;(三)釋義上從「背經」到「聖賢意中所必有」的開拓。而針對八股文「代聖立言」的詮釋進路,筆者也提了三點說明:(一)指出代言寫法與理學攸關;(二)代言書寫建構了儒學信仰共同體;(三)如此代言實寓有「以意逆志」之主體呈現。
The Ba-Gu-Writing that had been popular over 500 years was established in early Dynasty Ming and became popular in Dynasty Ching. This new writing had not only developed sophisticated techniques, the re-construction of doctrine when interpreting the classics had also its academic value. The re-construction of Ba-Gu-Writing, on the one hand, it had blended into the writer's personal understanding of the chapters, on the other hand, it showed the rationality of the various classics gradually joining and forging each other. This paper reviews the method of how Ba-Gu-Writing interprets the meaning in classics from two dimensions. The first part is to understand the hermeneutics by following the customs. The second part is the process of how to interpret according to personal appreciation. The author has pointed three points about the Ba-Gu-Writing's sequence of interpretation: 1) the "Daiyan" writing was close related to docrine; 2) the "Daiyan" writing constructed the complex of Confucian theology; 3) the Daiyan bears the representation of 「by the Meaning against the Will」.
期刊論文
1.鄧仕樑(19940100)。論謝靈運「擬魏太子鄴中集詩」。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part C, Humanities and Social Sciences,4(1),1-14。  延伸查詢new window
2.梅家玲(19950400)。論謝靈運〈擬魏太子鄴中集詩八首并序〉的美學特質--兼論漢晉詩賦中的擬作、代言現象及其相關問題。臺大中文學報,7,155-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃強(1998)。八股文的解釋學透析。揚州大學學報(人文科學版),1998(2),26-32。  延伸查詢new window
4.張曉軍(1999)。八股文與笠翁曲論。戲曲藝術,1,54。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.呂正惠(2000)。發端於「擬古」的詩藝─《古風》在李白詩中的意義。「中央研究院第三屆國際漢學會議」,1-17。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.姚鼐(1984)。惜抱軒全集。臺北市:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂中(1981)。類編皇朝大事記講義。台北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.張廷玉(1979)。明史。臺北:鼎文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.皮錫瑞(1969)。經學通論。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.梁章鉅(2001)。制藝叢話。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kundera, Milan、朱立元、李鈞、孟湄(2002)。二十世紀西方文論選。北京:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.顧炎武、黃侃、張繼(1979)。日知錄。臺北:明倫書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.馬端臨(2000)。文獻通考。浙江杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳喬(1969)。圍爐詩話。廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬通伯(1986)。韓昌黎文集校注。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.朱熹、黎靖德、王星賢(1994)。朱子語類。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.錢穆(1977)。宋明理學概述。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.魏禧、胡守仁、姚品文、王能憲(2003)。魏叔子文集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.喬衍琯(2002)。清代藝文志考評。清代學術論叢(4)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)周敦頤(1965)。周子通書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.方豪(1979)。宋史,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(明)艾南英(1980)。天傭子集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(明)宋濂(1979)。元史,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)方苞。欽定四書文。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)袁宏道(1964)。袁中郎尺牘,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)劉大櫆(2002)。海峰文集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)劉熙載(1990)。藝概,成都。  延伸查詢new window
9.(明)歸有光(1963)。歸震川集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(清)杭世駿(1995)。道古堂文集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)袁枚(1961)。小倉山房尺牘,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(明)黃宗羲(1969)。宋元學案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.(南宋)朱熹(1965)。近思錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.(明)李叔元。新鍥諸名家前後場肄業精訣。  延伸查詢new window
15.(南宋)朱熹(1991)。四書章句集註,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.(明)董其昌(2005)。畫禪室隨筆,中國。  延伸查詢new window
17.(明)歸有光(1963)。震川先生集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE