:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:人權與記憶的角力:被遺忘權的核心理念及其對檔案事業之衝擊與影響
書刊名:圖資與檔案學刊
作者:吳宇凡 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Yu-fan
出版日期:2017
卷期:9:1=90
頁次:頁15-31
主題關鍵詞:被遺忘權檔案館檔案典藏單位Right to be forgottenArchivesArchival institutions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:9
2014 年歐洲法院裁定當個人資料顯然已過時且不相關時,即使所刪除資訊在過去係屬合法公開,民眾仍有權要求網路業者刪除個人相關資訊之連結,這樣的權利稱之為被遺忘權。此權利的提出刺激相關單位及人員重新檢視自身業務及其所提供資料內容,而歷史文獻資料內容因涉及大量曾經合法公開之個人資訊,因此相關議題亦為記憶保存單位所爭議。為此,本文即聚焦於被遺忘權對於檔案典藏單位之影響,釐清被遺忘權之定義與範疇,以及國外檔案典藏單位對於是項議題之意見進行整理,不僅可作為檔案典藏相關單位參考,更可作為其他文化典藏單位在處理相關事宜時之借鑑。
In 2014 the EU put forward the concept of the right to be forgotten, and there is a great deal of general literature on exercise of the right. There is little specific guidance, however, for the impact of the right to be forgotten on memory-preserving institutions. By analyzing the literature of foreign archival institutions on the subject of the right to be forgotten, this paper clarifies the definition and scope of the right, and argues that the experience of the archival institutions in Taiwan and other foreign countries can provide a framework for the impact of the right to be forgotten on archival institutions.
期刊論文
1.楊智傑(20150700)。個人資料保護法制上「被遺忘權利」與「個人反對權」:從2014年西班牙Google v. AEPD案判決出發。國會月刊,43(7)=507,19-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許雪姬(20140800)。解嚴後臺灣口述歷史的發展及其檢討,1987~2014。臺灣口述歷史學會會刊,5,2-38。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kelly, M. J.、Satola, D.(2017)。The right to be forgotten。University of Illinois Law Review,1,1-64。  new window
單篇論文
1.European Commission(2011)。European Commission consultation on the Commission's comprehensive approach on data protection in the European Union (COM (2010) 609 final) - Response from The National Archives of England, Wales and the United Kingdom,http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0006/contributions/public_authorities/natarchives _uk_en.pdf。  new window
2.European Commission(2013)。Minutes - Joint meeting of the EAG with EBNA in Dublin, Ireland- 3 April 2013,http://ec.europa.eu/archival-policy/docs/eag/cr/130403_minutes_en.pdf。  new window
3.European Commission。Factsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" ruling (C-131/12),http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/files/factsheets/factsheet_data_protection_en.pdf。  new window
其他
1.Zittrain, Jonathan(20140514)。Don't Force Google to 'Forget',http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/opinion/dont-force-google-to-forget.html?smid=twshare&_r=0。  new window
2.楊政郡(20151118)。個資保護過頭 法界一片痛罵聲,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/933236。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾韋禎,湯佳玲(20120930)。個資法明起上路 戰後史料限縮 學界恐慌,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/619066。  延伸查詢new window
4.智由博集(20160724)。被遺忘權在台灣是否能主張,待定!,http://technews.tw/2016/07/24/right-to-be-forgotten-google-taiwan/。  延伸查詢new window
5.Article 19(2016)。The "Right to be Forgotten": Remembering freedom of expression,https://www.articlel9.org/data/files/The_right_to_be_forgotten_A5_EHH_HYPERLINKS.pdf。  new window
6.薛理桂(20160802)。國史館開倒車,http://opimon.chinatimes.com/20160802006527-262105。  延伸查詢new window
7.獨立媒體(20141125)。擱置在香港引入「被遺忘權」,https://inmediahk.Org/2014/ll/25/%E6%93%Bl%E7%BD%AE%E5%9C%A8%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%BC%95%E5%85%A5%E3%80%8C%E8%A2%AB%E9%81%BA%E5%BF%98%E6%AC%8A%E3%80%8D/。  new window
8.鄭鴻達(20170226)。228檔案難調閱 陳儀深:應立法排除障礙,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1081414。  延伸查詢new window
9.Google Transparency Report(2017)。Search removals under European privacy law,https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/europeprivacy/?hl=zh-TW。  new window
10.Beckles, C.(2013)。Will the right to be forgotten lead to a society that was forgotten?,https://iapp.Org/news/a/will-the-right-to-be-forgotten-lead-to-a-society-that-was-forgotten。  new window
11.Jarvis, J.(20140530)。The right to remember, damnit,http://buzzmachine.com/2014/05/30/right-remember-damnit/。  new window
12.Ireland Archives and Records Association(2014)。Annual general meeting,http://www.leamaboutarchives.ie/~leamabo/images/documents/ARA%20I%202015%20AGM/ARA_I_AGM_MINS_20_3_2014.pdf。  new window
13.Sorensen, J. D.(2008)。The conflict between data protection and archiving,http://dlmforum.typepad.com/Slovenia_Sorensen.pdf。  new window
14.Yau, C.(20140616)。Hong Kong to lobby Google over the 'right to be forgotten',http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1533618/privacy-chief-allan-chiang-wants-right-be-forgotten-extended-asia?page=all。  new window
15.Turnbull, M.(2014)。National Archives Conference Address - Open for business in the digital economy,http://www.malcolmtumbull.com.au/media/national-archives-conference-address-open-for-business-in-the-digital-econo。  new window
圖書論文
1.王利明(2015)。網絡不是檔案館--談談被遺忘權。法治:良法與善治。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Szekely, I.(2014)。The right to be forgotten and the new archival paradigm。The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age。London:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE