:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:921集集地震建築物災損空間特性解析
書刊名:建築學報
作者:張學聖 引用關係陳姿伶王鈺淋
作者(外文):Chang, Hsueh-shengChen, Tzu-lingWang, Yu-lin
出版日期:2017
卷期:101
頁次:頁59-75
主題關鍵詞:建築物毀損率地震風險區數量化理論II類分析Building damage ratioEarthquake risk areaQuantification theory type II
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:7
地震的不可預測增添災害致命性,建築物的傾斜、毀損、坍塌為主要的災害損失。過去有關地震減災之土地管理,常以斷層距離為管制要因。然而影響地震災害損失要因涉及建築結構、使用型態、土地條件等多項因子。本文以921集集地震事件經驗為研究案例,關注於二個構面解析建築物災損空間特性:「建築物毀損率與斷層帶的距離關係」與「地震風險區受災建築物特性」。首先,應用單因子變異數分析方法探究建築物毀損率與斷層帶的距離關係,進一步應用數量化理論II類分析進行建築物毀損影響因素的分類。研究結果顯示,斷層兩側45公尺內之毀損與45公尺外之毀損確實存在差異,以及當建築物歸屬於「建築年代1(民國63年以前)」、「位於上盤」時,其所受到的地震衝擊較為顯著,以及斷層兩側45公尺距離內,地質環境特性如鄰山、鄰河顯著影響建築物的受損情形。本文進一步參考他國地震管理作為進行土地管理綜合比較分析,研究發現期供後續探究地震風險地區土地規劃管理推動面與操作面等研究之參考。
Earthquake is an unpredictable disaster and fatalness. The building damage and collapse are the major loss during the earthquake disaster. Past studies have proposed land use regulation along the fault to mitigate earthquake disaster. However, there are other factors result in building damage including building structure, land use type and geographic location etc. Therefore, this paper applies Chi-Chi Earthquake as the case study to explore "the relationship between building damage ratio and the distance from the fault" and "building features in earthquake risk area". First of all, this paper applies one-way analysis of variance to explore the building damage ratio under various distances from the fault line. Furthermore, quantification theory type II is then applied to categorize the building damage factors. The results show that there is a significant building damage difference on the distance of 45 meters. And buildings built before 1974 and located on upper fault are suffered much serious damage. In addition, the geologic features such as river and cliff might have impact on building damage. In the end, this study conducts comparative analysis on land use managements among other countries suffering similar earthquake risk. Overall, the results might be referred to future studies on land use plan and land use management in earthquake risk areas.
期刊論文
1.Allen, K. M.(2006)。Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines。Disasters,30(1),81-101。  new window
2.Cutter, S. L.、Mitchell, J. T.、Scott, M. S.(2000)。Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina。Annals of the Association of American Geographers,90(4),713-737。  new window
3.李錫堤、康耿豪、鄭錦桐、廖啟雯(20001000)。921集集大地震之地表破裂及地盤變形現象。地工技術,81,5-18。  延伸查詢new window
4.柯于璋(20081200)。土地使用減災工具之政策規劃可行性評估:模糊德菲層級法之應用。行政暨政策學報,47,57-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Saunders, W. S. A.、Becker, J. S.(2015)。A discussion of resilience and sustainability: Land use planning recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand。International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,14(part 1),73-81。  new window
6.Becker, J. S.、Beban, J.、Saunders, W. S. A.、Van Dissen, R.、King, A.(2013)。Land use planning and policy for earthquakes in the Wellington region, New Zealand (2001-2011)。Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies,2013(1),3-16。  new window
7.Burby, R. J.(2006)。Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise government decisions for hazardous areas。The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,64,171-191。  new window
8.White, G. F.、Kates, R. W.、Burton, I.(2001)。Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazards management。Environmental Hazards,3(3/4),81-92。  new window
9.蕭謙麗、林明聖(20000200)。九二一地震與車籠埔斷層的省思。環境教育季刊,41,8-13。  延伸查詢new window
10.闕河淵(1999)。建築技術規則有關活動斷層規定之探討。技師報,157,1-3。  延伸查詢new window
11.Smith, G.(2010)。Lessons from the United States: Planning for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction。The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies,2010(1)。  new window
研究報告
1.蕭江碧、葉祥海、蔡克銓(1999)。921集集大地震建築物震害調查初步報告。台北縣:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schwab, J.、Topping, K. C.、Eadie, C. C.、Deyle, R. E.、Smith, R. A.(1998)。Planning for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction。Chicago IL:American Planning Association。  new window
3.Kerr, J.、Nathan, S.、Van Dissen, R. J.、Webb, P.、Brunsdon, D.、King, A. B.(2003)。Planning for development of land, on or close to active faults: an interim guideline to assist resource management planners in New Zealand。Wellington:Ministry for the Environment Manatu Mo Te Taiao。  new window
4.林銘郎、李崇正、黃文昭、黃文正、粘為東、詹佩臻、張有毅、劉桓吉、盧詩丁、陳盈璇(2012)。活動斷層近地表特性研究。台北市:經濟部中央地質調查所。  延伸查詢new window
5.簡文郁、張毓文、邱世彬(2011)。近斷層設計地震調整因子研究。台北市:財團法人國家實驗研究院國家地震工程研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.趙志銘(2002)。以二元資料迴歸方法建構建物震害危險度最適預測模式--以中興新村都市計畫區為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。  延伸查詢new window
2.藍百圻(2002)。既有RC沿街店舖住宅滿足功能要求之耐震補強(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.CRED(2011)。Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2011: The Numbers and Trends。Brussels, Belgium:Ciaco Imprimerie, Louvain-la-Neuve。  new window
2.Fordham, M.(2007)。Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge。NC:Duke University Press。  new window
3.Friedmann, John(1987)。Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action。Princeton University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Godschalk, David R.(1991)。Disaster Mitigation and Hazard Management。Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government。International City Management Association。  new window
2.Smith, G. P.、Wenger, D.(2007)。Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing agenda。Handbook of disaster research。New York:Springer。  new window
3.Becker, J. S.、Saunders, W. S. A.、Hopkins, L.、Wright, K.、Johnston, D. M.(2010)。Preplanning for recovery。Community Disaster Recovery and Resilience: Exploring Global Opportunities and Challenges。Taylor & Francis Group。  new window
4.Guha-Sapir, D.、Vos, F.(2011)。Earthquakes: An epidemiological perspective on patterns and trends。Human Casualties in Earthquakes Progress in Modelling and Mitigation。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE