:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同相對頻率結果獲知回饋下網球正手擊球技能學習之效應探討
書刊名:嘉大體育健康休閒
作者:陳新福
作者(外文):Chen, Hsin-fu
出版日期:2018
卷期:17:2
頁次:頁1-12
主題關鍵詞:結果獲知相對頻率網球正手擊球技能表現Knowledge of resultRelative frequencyTennis forehandSkill performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究目的旨在探討不同相對頻率的結果獲知回饋對網球正手擊球準確性的影響。研究對象為某大學男學生且未學習過網球之相關動作者並分為四組,每組20人,共80名。分別為100%、50%、20%和0%結果獲知(KR)組,依不同組別給予回饋後紀錄其網球落地準確性得分,並以網球落點之區域來判定其得分高低。本研究以不同回饋組別(100%KR、50%KR、20% KR及0%KR)及測驗別(前測、立即測及保留測)為自變項,擊球準確性得分為依變項,採混合設計二因子變異數分析加以考驗,若交互作用有顯著,則以單純主要效果進一步加以考驗,以驗證其差異性。本研究的顯著水準訂為α=.05。研究結果指出:一、不同組別及測驗別有交互作用關係存在。在組別中,100%KR、50% KR及20%KR的表現優於0%KR;在測驗別中,立即測及保留測的表現均優於前測。本研究結論:經由回饋可提升網球正手擊球的準確性,而習得的技能歷經一段時間的儲存會產生進步的效應。
This research objective is to discuss with influence of knowledge of result learning feedback of different relative frequency to tennis forehand accuracy. Research targets are a total of 80 men students of University without learning tennis forehand knowledge and operation. They are divided into 4 groups, 20 persons for each, namely, 100%, 50%, 20% and 0% of knowledge of result (KR). Record tolerance according to different group feedback then calculate accuracy score. This research uses different feedback groups (100%, 50%, 20% and 0%KR) and test (previous, instant and retained measurement) as dependent variables, accuracy score are dependent variables. Use mixed design two-factor ANOVA for checking. Check simple main effect and verify difference if interaction is significance. The significance level of this research is α=.05. Research results show that first, accuracy score has on interaction in different groups and tests. Second, on groups, 100%, 50% and 20%KR performance is better than 0%KR; third, on tests, instant and retained measurement performance is better than previous measurement. This research conclusion is that tennis forehand accuracy can enhance by feedback, and learned skills have a progressive effect through storage over a period of time.
期刊論文
1.吳家碧(20020300)。適當回饋在體育教學上之探討。育達研究叢刊,3,185-189。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ávila, L. T. G.、Chiviacowsky, S.、Wulf, G.、Lewthwaite, R.(2012)。Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children。Psychology of Sport and Exercise,13,849-853。  new window
3.Chiviacowsky, S.、Wulf, G.(2007)。Feedback after good trials enhances learning。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,78,40-47。  new window
4.Wulf, G.、Chiviacowsky, S.、Lewthwaite, R.(2010)。Normative feedback effects on the learning of a timing task。Human Movement Science,38,235-240。  new window
5.吳詩薇、張至滿、卓俊伶、蔡銘仁(20160300)。摘要結果獲知的時近訊息有利於自我控制學習。大專體育學刊,18(1),14-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林清香(20040600)。不同表現獲知對排球低手發球學習之影響。文化體育學刊,2,63-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳春安、李政違(2002)。目標難度與結果獲知對桌球正手擊球表現之影響。大專體育學術專刊,91,132-142。  延伸查詢new window
8.Pinzon, D.、Vega, R.、Sanchez, Y. P.、Zheng, B.(2016)。Skill learning from kinesthetic feedback。The American Journal of Surgery,25,1-5。  new window
9.Vieira, M. M.、Ugrinowitsch, H.、Gallo, L. G.、Soares Pinto Carvalho, M. F.、Fonseca, M. A.、Benda, R. N.(2014)。Effects of summary knowledge of results in motor skills acquisition。Revista de Psicología del Deporte,23,9-14。  new window
10.Salmoni, Alan W.、Schmidt, Richard A.、Walter, Charles B.(1984)。Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical Reappraisal。Psychological Bulletin,95(3),355-386。  new window
學位論文
1.廖邦伶(2004)。結果獲知對羽球技能學習之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.林耀豐(2003)。工作限制下技能水準差異和訓練對網球正手拍技能表現的影響(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃芊葳(2014)。不同相對頻率結果獲知回饋對國小韻律體操選手拋球技能表現之影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳詩薇(2011)。口語摘要結果獲知的時近效應:外在訊息與內在訊息的檢驗(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳詩薇(2017)。摘要結果獲知的時近訊息--訊息量與練習量的動作表現與學習效應(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林逸(2016)。適應式結果獲知的自我效能預測及動作學習效應(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張凱翔(2017)。不同相對頻率的結果獲知回饋對高爾夫球短擊球揮桿技能學習之影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林清和(2006)。運動學習程式學。臺北縣:泰宇。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mosston, M.、Ashworth, S.(1994)。Teaching Physical Education。Merrill。  new window
3.Schmidt, Richard A.、Lee, Timothy D.(2011)。Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis。Human Kinetics。  new window
4.Schmidt, Richard A.(1988)。Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis。Human Kinetics。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schmidt, R. A.(1991)。Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations。Tutorials in motor neuroscience。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE