:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:毒品法庭的制度內涵與爭議檢討
書刊名:犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:林俊儒
作者(外文):Lin, Jun-ru
出版日期:2019
卷期:31
頁次:頁35-70
主題關鍵詞:戒癮治療治療式司法毒品法庭病患型犯人問題解決型法庭Addiction treatmentTherapeutic justiceDrug courtPatient and prisonerProblem-solving court
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.Heck, Cary、Roussell, Aaron、Culhane, Scott E.(2009)。Assessing the Effects of the Drug Court Intervention on Offender Criminal Trajectories: A Research Note。Criminal Justice Policy Review,20(2),236-246。  new window
2.Portillo, Shannon、Rudes, Danielle S.、Viglione, Jill(2013)。Front-stage stars and backstage producers: The role of judges in problem-solving courts。VICTIMS & OFFENDERS,8(1),1-22。  new window
3.Winick, Bruce J.(2002)。Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Problem Solving Courts。Fordham Urban Law Journal,30(3),1055-1103。  new window
4.王皇玉(20041100)。論施用毒品行為之犯罪化。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,33(6),39-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.楊秀儀(20070600)。論病人自主權--我國法上「告知後同意」之請求權基礎探討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,36(2),229-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lane, Eric(2003)。Due Process and Problem Solving Courts。Fordham Urban Law Journal,30(3),955-1026。  new window
7.紀致光(20141200)。緩起訴處分戒癮治療之回顧與展望。犯罪學期刊,17(2),193-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊冀華(20170700)。美國毒品法庭計畫與我國附命完成戒癮治療緩起訴處分之比較。矯政,6(2),19-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bozza, J. A.(2007)。Benevolent behavior modification: Understanding the nature and limitations of problem-solving courts。Widener Law Journal,17(1),97-143。  new window
10.Casey, T.(2004)。When good intentions are not enough: Problem-solving courts and the impending crisis of legitimacy。SMU Law Review,57,1459-1520。  new window
11.Daicoff, S.(2006)。Law as a healing profession: The "Comprehensive Law Movement"。Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal,6(1),1-62。  new window
12.Dematteo, D. S.、Marlowe, D. B.、Festinger, D. S.(2006)。Secondary prevention services for clients who are low risk in drug court: A conceptual model。Crime and Delinquency,52(1),114-134。  new window
13.Duffy, J.(2011)。Problem-solving courts, therapeutic jurisprudence and the constitution: If two is company, is three a crowd?。Melbourne University Law Review,35,394-425。  new window
14.Fisher, C.(2014)。Treating the disease or punishing the criminal?: Effectively using drug court sanctions to treat substance use disorder and decrease criminal conduct。Minnesota Law Review,99(2),747-781。  new window
15.Goldkamp, J. S.(2000)。The drug court response: Issue and implications for justice change。Albany Law Review,63,923-961。  new window
16.Hora, P. F.(2011)。Courting new solutions using problem-solving justice: Key components, guiding principles, strategies, responses, models, approaches, blueprints and tool kits。Chapman Journal of Criminal Justice,2(1),7-52。  new window
17.Mackenzie, B.(2015)。The Judge is the key component: The importance of procedural fairness in drug-treatment courts。Court Review,52,8-34。  new window
18.Popovic, J.(2006)。Court process and therapeutic jurisprudence: Have we thrown the baby out with the bathwater。E-Law Journal,1,60-77。  new window
19.Seddon, T.(2007)。Coerced drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Conceptual, ethical and criminological issues。Criminology and Criminal Justice,7(3),269-286。  new window
學位論文
1.周暉念(2009)。假釋決定之要件、程序與救濟制度之探討(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊儒(2018)。毒品法庭的批判性考察(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Georges, L. C.(2014)。Procedural due process in modern problem-solving courts: An application of the asymmetric immune knowledge hypothesis(博士論文)。University of Nebraska,Lincoln, NE。  new window
圖書
1.Marlowe, Douglas B.、Meyer, William G.(2011)。The Drug Court Judicial Benchbook。National Drug Court Institute。  new window
2.The National Association of Drug Court Professionals(1997)。Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components。The Drug Courts Program Office, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice。  new window
3.丸山泰宏(2015)。刑事司法における薬物依存治療ブログラムの意義:「回復」をめぐる権力と義務。東京都:日本評論社。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃榮堅(1988)。刑罰的極限。臺北市:元照。  延伸查詢new window
5.Berman, G.、Fox, A.(2010)。Trial & error in criminal justice reform: Learning from failure。New York, NY:Urban Institute Press。  new window
6.Mackinem, M. B.、Higgins P.(2008)。Drug court: Constructing the moral identity of drug offenders。Springfield, IL:Charles C. Thomas。  new window
7.Miller, J. L.、Johnson, D. C.(2009)。Problem solving courts: A measure of Justice。New York, NY:Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
8.Murphy, J.(2015)。Illness Or Deviance? Drug Courts, Drug Treatment and the ambiguity of addiction。Pennsylvania, PA:Temple University Press。  new window
9.National Association of Drug Court Professionals(2013)。Adult drug court best practice standards。  new window
10.National Association of Drug Court Professionals(2015)。Adult drug court best practice standards。  new window
11.Nolan, J. L.(2003)。Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
12.Nolan, J. L.(2009)。Legal accents, legal borrowing: The international problem-solving courts movement。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
13.Roth, M. P.(2011)。Crime and punishment: A history of the criminal justice system。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth:Cengage Learning。  new window
14.Tiger, R.(2012)。Judging addicts: Drug courts and coercion in the justice system。New York, NY:New York University Press。  new window
其他
1.賴佩璇(20170525)。司改國是會議 兩派論戰是否設「毒品法庭」,https://udn.com/news/story/7315/2484014。  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊儒(20181111)。簡評2018年法務部《毒品危害防制條例》草案,https://www.upmedia.mg/news_mfo.php?SerialNo=51759。  延伸查詢new window
3.林達(20171204)。創建毒品法庭升級作業系統,https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20171204/1252792/。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭白雪(20170814)。設毒品法庭…蔡英文:該做司法院長:再研究,https://udn.com/news/story/9939/2640704。  延伸查詢new window
5.Gallup(2016)。Confidence in institutions,http://www.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspx。  new window
6.National Association of Drug Court Professionals,Marlowe, Douglas B.,Hardin, Carolyn D.,Fox, Carson L.(2016)。Painting the Current Picture: A National Report on Drug Courts and Other Problem-Solving Courts in the United States,https://www.ndci.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Painting-the-Current-Picture-2016.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.尾田真言(2007)。ドラッグ•コー卜制度。日本版ドラッグ・コート―処罰から治療へ。東京都:日本評論社。  延伸查詢new window
2.森村たまき(2007)。ドラッグ•コー卜前史一アメリカにおける薬物政策の変遷。日本版ドラッグ‧コー卜一処罰から治療へ。東京都:日本評論社。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊士隆、李宗憲(2013)。藥物濫用之處遇制度--美國毒品法庭。藥教濫用、毒品與防治。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝如媛(2011)。論美國毒品法庭制度--從懲罰到醫療的刑事司法實踐。刑事法學的新視野。臺北市:元照。  延伸查詢new window
5.Dworkin, G.(2015)。Defining paternalism。New perspectives on paternalism and health care。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
6.湯德宗(2005)。論憲法上的正當程序保障。行政程序法論。元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE