:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置資訊之令狀原則--自美國Carpenter案之觀察
書刊名:月旦法學
作者:溫祖德 引用關係
出版日期:2020
卷期:297
頁次:頁130-147
主題關鍵詞:調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置資訊令狀原則第三人原則大數據偵查資訊隱私
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:5
期刊論文
1.李榮耕(20100600)。論偵查機關對通信紀錄的調取。政大法學評論,115,115-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李榮耕(20150900)。科技定位監控與犯罪偵查:兼論美國近年GPS追蹤法制及實務之發展。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,44(3),871-969。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.溫祖德(20150400)。行動電話內數位資訊與附帶搜索--以美國聯邦最高法院見解之變遷為主。月旦法學,239,198-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.溫祖德(20180700)。從Jones案論使用GPS定位追蹤器之合憲性--兼評馬賽克理論。東吳法律學報,30(1),121-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Borchert, Christopher J.(2015)。Reasonable Expectations of Privacy Settings: Social Media and the Stored Communications Act。DUKE L. & TECH. REV.,13,36+40-41。  new window
6.Blanke, Jordan M.(2018)。Carpenter v. United States Begs for Action。University of Illinois Law Review,2018,260-267。  new window
7.Freiwald, Susan、Smith, Stephen Wm.(2018)。The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance。Harvard Law Review,132(1),205-235。  new window
8.Ford, Matt(20171001)。American Policing Goes to the Supreme Court。The Atlantic,2017(Oct.)。  new window
9.Sorkin, Amy Davidson(20180622)。In Carpenter, the Supreme Court Rules, Narrowly, for Privacy。The New Yorker,2018(Jun.)。  new window
圖書
1.李榮耕(2018)。通訊保障及監察法。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kamisar, Yale、Lafave, Wayne R.、Israel, Jerold H.、King, Nancy J.、Kerr, Orin S.、Primus, Eve Brensike(2019)。Modern Criminal Procedure: cases comments and questions。  new window
3.LaFave, Wayne R.、Israel, Jerold H.、King, Nancy J.、Kerr, Orin S.(2019)。Criminal Procedure。  new window
4.Allen, Ronald Jay、Stuntz, Williams J.、Hoffmann, Joseph L.、Livingston, Debra A.、Leipold, Andrew D.(2011)。Comprehensive Criminal Procedure。  new window
5.麥爾荀伯格、庫基耶、林俊宏(2017)。大數據:數位革命之後,資料革命登場:巨量資料掀起生活、工作和思考方式的全面革新。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie(2017)。Carpenter v. United States: Brief of Scholars of Criminal Procedure and Privacy as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner,https://ssrn.com/abstract=3019294。  new window
其他
1.Harrington, Ben(2018)。Update: Supreme Court Takes Fourth Amendment Case about Cell Phone Location Data,Congressional Research Service。,https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10157。  new window
2.Solove, Daniel(2018)。Carpenter v. United States, Cell Phone Location Records, and the Third Party Doctrine,http://www.techpolicy.com/Solove_Carpenter-v-UnitedStates-CellPhoneLocationRecords-andThirdPartyDoctrine.aspx。  new window
3.Liptak, Adam(20180622)。In Ruling on Cellphone Location Data, Supreme Court Makes Statement on Digital Privacy,https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html。  new window
4.Kaminski, Margot E.(20180702)。Response, Carpenter v. United States: Big Data Is Different,https://www.gwlr.org/carpenter-v-united-states-big-data-is-different。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE