:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:參與兒童性侵害案件之歷程探討--以司法詢問員為例
書刊名:青少年犯罪防治研究期刊
作者:黃柏霖許華孚 引用關係劉育偉 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Po LinHsu, Hua FuLiu, Yu Wei
出版日期:2020
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁83-113
主題關鍵詞:司法詢問員兒童性侵害司法程序刑事Forensic interviewerChildSexual assaultJudicial processCriminal
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:5
在兒童性侵害案件中往往沒有明顯的跡證,只能仰賴被害兒童所提供的證詞,為取得品質良好的兒童證詞,需依循一套良善的司法詢問架構,我國司法詢問員制度於2017年開始施行,本文藉由質性深度訪談5位司法詢問員(2位社工師、2位心理師及1位特教老師)探討司法詢問員之實際參與兒童性侵害心路歷程,研究發現司法詢問員是保護兒童或心智障礙者受性侵害時,不可或缺的角色,且職場因素影響司法詢問員出勤意願;另外,同時也指出培訓內容應再加強,性別並非建立關係的主要因素及詢問初期壓力大,必須要有熱忱支撐等需要精進之方向,並分析現行司法詢問員面臨之難題及對未來發展方向提出建議。
In cases of child sexual assault, there is often no obvious evidence, and investigations can only rely on the testimony provided by the child victim. In order to obtain good quality testimony from children, a good judicial inquiry framework is required. This article discusses the forensic interviewer's (who began in 2017) mental process of participating in child sexual abuse cases through in-depth interviews with 5 such interviewers. The study found that the role of the forensic interviewer is indispensable in protecting children or mentally handicapped people from sexual abuse. Several points were found to be important. First, workplace factors influence the forensic interviewer's willingness to attend. In addition, it was also pointed out that the training content related to this role should be further strengthened, gender was not the main factor for establishing relationships, and there was initial pressure in the inquiries. There must be enthusiastic support for this role and other directions that could be employed need to be refined. This study also analyzes the difficulties faced by current forensic interviewers and proposes future directions that could beneficially be employed.
期刊論文
1.黃翠紋、陳佳雯(20121200)。我國性侵害防治政策推動現況之研究。警政論叢,12,47-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳維雅(20070100)。「你相不相信孩子」?--論兒童性侵害案件中之兒童證人及專家證人兼評臺灣高等法院92年少連上訴字第218號刑事判決。檢察新論,1,131-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張瑋心(2012)。論性侵案件「兒童被害人證言可信性」之檢驗。司法新聲,102,71-88。  延伸查詢new window
4.Faller, K. C.(2014)。Forty years of forensic interviewing of children suspected of sexual abuse, 1974-2014: Historical benchmarks。Social Sciences,4(1),34-65。  new window
5.Lyon, T. D.(2014)。Interviewing children。Annual Review of Law and Social Science,10(1),73-89。  new window
6.Teoh, Y.-S.、Lamb, M. E.(2010)。Preparing children for investigative interviews: Rapport-building, instruction, and evaluation。Applied Developmental Science,14(3),154-163。  new window
7.王燦槐(20010600)。臺灣性侵害受害者服務政策之困境分析--談官方性侵害防治中心的服務困境。社會文化學報,12,115-131。  延伸查詢new window
8.李晉偉(2014)。淺談美國兒童證人司法訪談員制度--從偵查實務角度研析。刑事雙月刊,63,54-59。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳昱如、周愫嫻(20161200)。從兒童性侵害案件看兒童性同意權與證述能力。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,19,201-226。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭瑞隆(20171100)。NICHD司法詢問技術於兒少性侵害案件之運用。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,20,271-288。  延伸查詢new window
11.王如玄(20150300)。刑法妨害性自主罪修法後司法實踐之我見。社區發展季刊,149,91-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.高瑱娟、尤素芬(20180600)。我國司法詢問員制度之源起及現況。社區發展季刊,162,85-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Cyr, M.、Lamb, M. E.(2009)。Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD Interview Protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of sexual abuse in Quebec。Child Abuse and Neglect,33(5),257-268。  new window
14.Sternberg, K.、Lamb, M.、Hershkowitz, I.、Yudilevitch, L.、Orbach, Y.、Esplin, P.、Hovav, M.(1997)。Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse。Child Abuse & Neglect,21(11),1133-1146。  new window
研究報告
1.趙善如、陸悌、蔡景宏、張麗珠、林宏陽、郭致遠(2014)。高雄市性侵害案件專業團隊早期鑑定模式成效評估研究案。高雄市:國立屏東科技大學社會工作系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張錦麗(2005)。台灣地區「性侵害被害人減少重複陳述方案」之行動研究(博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.溫翎佑(2019)。司法詢問員制度應用於兒童性侵害案件之實證研究(博士論文)。中央警察大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林宏嘉(2016)。性侵害案件被害兒童供述證據之研究(碩士論文)。國防大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃柏霖(2020)。臺灣司法詢問運作制度之探究--從司法詢問員參與兒童性侵害案件司法程序的歷程出發(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.闕士超(2018)。兒童妨害性自主案件中司法詢問員之定位--兼論我國引進兒童倡議中心之可能性(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.內政部(2004)。「性侵害案件減少被害人重複陳述作業」方案成效評估研究。臺北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃翠紋(2013)。婦幼安全政策分析。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bernard, H. R.(2006)。Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches。AltaMira Press。  new window
其他
1.翁栢萱(20180910)。性侵害犯罪案件證據法則建立之研析,https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=5249&pid=173457。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Faller, K.、Hewitt, S.(2007)。Special Considerations for Cases Involving Young Children。Interviewing Children about Sexual Abuse: Controversies and Best Practice。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top