期刊論文1. | Michel, Paul R.(2000)。The Role and Responsibility of Patent Attorneys in Improving the Doctrine of Equivalents。Idea,40(1),123-129。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
2. | White, D. Alan(2010)。The Doctrine of Equivalents: Fairness and Uncertainty in an Era of Biologic Pharmaceuticals。Emory Law Journal,60(3),751-795。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
3. | 沈宗倫(20110300)。手段功能專利侵害與均等論之適用--評智慧財產法院九十八年度民專上易字第三號判決。月旦法學,190,125-146。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
4. | 沈宗倫(20081100)。均等論與禁反言之「權利糾葛」--評最高法院九十六年臺上字第一一三四號民事判決及其下級法院判決。月旦法學,162,138-166。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
5. | Allison, John R.、Lemley, Mark A.(2007)。The (Unnoticed) Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents。Stanford Law Review,59(4),955-984。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
6. | Conigliaro, Matthew J.、Greenberg, Andrew C.、Lemley, Mark A.(2001)。Foreseeability in Patent Law。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,16(3),1045-1074。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
7. | Levin, Richard C.(1987)。Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development。Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1987(3),783-831。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
8. | 沈宗倫(20081000)。專利侵害均等論之過去、現在及未來--我國法應何去何從?。東吳法律學報,20(2),173-222。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
9. | 沈宗倫(20131200)。均等論與先前技術既存秩序之尊重--以先前技術阻卻為中心評最高法院一0一年度臺上字第三八號民事判決及其下級法院判決。月旦法學,223,225-244。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
10. | 張添榜(20131000)。以置換性判斷專利均等侵權之研究。東吳法律學報,25(2),125-163。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
11. | 張添榜、王立達、劉尚志(20131200)。我國專利法上均等論適用之實證研究:是變奏還是變調?。科技法學評論,10(2),1-71。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
12. | Wagner, R. Polk(2002)。Reconsidering Estoppel: Patent Administration and The Failure of Festo。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,151(1),159-244。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
13. | 陳國成(20160600)。我國均等論實務之發展--由最高法院102年度臺上字第1986號判決觀察。科技法學評論,13(1),69-114。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
14. | Walter, Derek(2005)。Prosecution History Estoppel in the Post-Festo Era: The Increased Importance of Determining What Constitutes a Relevant Narrowing Claim Amendment。BERKELEY TECH. L. J.,20(1),123-146。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
15. | Hughey, Rachel C.、Nguyen, Linhda(2016)。Exceptions to Prosecution History Estoppel Are Hardly a Dime a Dozen: An Analysis of the Federal Circuit's Application of the Narrow Exceptions to Prosecution History Estoppel Twelve Years After Festo。Cybaris®,7(1)。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
16. | 陳志杰、劉尚志(20041000)。論均等論之比對方式--逐項測試法之優缺點探討。科技法學評論,1(2),397-425。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |