:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧財產權法發展專題回顧:近年來我國智慧財產判決回顧
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:謝銘洋 引用關係
作者(外文):Shieh, Ming-yan
出版日期:2016
卷期:45:特刊
頁次:頁1727-1771
主題關鍵詞:專利商標著作權營業秘密授權著名商標關鍵字廣告反向混淆合理使用均等論PatentTrade markCopyrightTrade secretLicensingLikelihood of confusionFamous markKeyword advertisingReverse confusionFair useDerivative work
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:59
本文在於對臺灣近年來具有指標性以及爭議性的智慧財產重要判決,有系統地整理與分析,其中主要為智慧財產法院的判決,也包括上訴之後的最高法院與最高行政法院的判決。專利法領域的判決,主要為進步性、權利歸屬、授權爭議、均等論之判斷以及損害賠償合理權利金之計算問題。商標領域則包括是否構成商標使用行為之判斷、混淆誤認之虞之判斷、著名商標之認定、關鍵字廣告爭議以及一些判決中提到的反向混淆問題。著作權法之判決則主要是創作性、權利歸屬、授權範圍以及合理使用之認定。營業秘密法案件則除介紹近年來最受注目的台積電案外,主要為是否符合保護要件之認定與爭議,法院對於營業秘密的認定採取相當嚴格的態度,許多案件因而無法受到保護。
This article offers a systematic review of some controversial intellectual property landmark cases in Taiwan over recent years, including, largely, decisions by the Intellectual Property Court, as well as appellate decisions by the Supreme Court or the Supreme Administrative Court. In this article, the review of patent cases mainly concentrates on issues related to inventive steps, work for hire, licensing agreement, the doctrine of equivalents, and reasonable royalty damages. With respect to trademark, the author analyzes cases concerning use of trade mark, likelihood of confusion, famous mark, keyword advertising, and reverse confusion. In regard to copyright, the review primarily covers controversies over creativity, work for hire, scope of licensing, and fair use. In addition to the foregoing, this article undertakes a comprehensive study on some trade secret decisions in recent times, including the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company case, which involves disputes regarding criteria for trade secret protection and has drawn wide attention from the public. The study reveals that courts have adopted a stricter standard for the determination of trade secret, rendering it difficult and challenging for confidential information to be protected as trade secret in many cases.
期刊論文
1.馮震宇(20110600)。從國際間對商標減損規範看智財法院Intel案判決與商標法修正。智慧財產評論,9(1),43-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.沈宗倫(20081000)。專利侵害均等論之過去、現在及未來--我國法應何去何從?。東吳法律學報,20(2),173-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳昭華(20020600)。商標使用規定之再探討--以我國、歐盟及德國之規定為中心。輔仁法學,23,273-339。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.余啟民(20081000)。網路關鍵字廣告之商標爭議。法學叢刊,53(4)=212,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.謝國廉(20121200)。網路關鍵字廣告之商標權侵害爭議--評析美國與歐盟實務對於商標使用之界定。科技法學評論,9(2),1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Cusson, Molly S.(1995)。Reverse Confusion: Modifying the PolaroidFactors to Achieve Consistent Results。Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L. J.,6,179。  new window
7.李治安(20131215)。合理保密措施與客戶資訊之營業秘密保護/最高院102臺上235民事判決。臺灣法學雜誌,238,199-207。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾子晴(2016)。專利法上均等侵權之判斷--從全要件原則的釐清出發(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝銘洋(2016)。智慧財產權法。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE