:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧法院之發展與界限--演算法、科技治理與司法韌性
書刊名:月旦法學
作者:林勤富
出版日期:2022
卷期:324
頁次:頁109-131
主題關鍵詞:智慧法院司法韌性人工智慧科技治理可解釋性
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.Rosenberg, Gerald N.(1992)。Judicial independence and the reality of political power。Review of Politics,54(3),369-398。  new window
2.李建良(20020300)。論審判獨立與司法行政命令權之關係--解析司法院大法官釋字第五三○號解釋。臺灣本土法學雜誌,32,43-59。  延伸查詢new window
3.Citron, Danielle Keats(2008)。Technological Due Process。Washington University Law Review,85(6),1249-1314。  new window
4.Kroll, Joshua A.、Huey, J.、Barocas, S.、Felten, E. W.、Reidenberg, J. R.、Robinson, D. G.、Yu, H.(2017)。Accountable Algorithms。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,165(3),633-705。  new window
5.Wachter, Sandra、Mittelstadt, B.、Floridi, L.(2017)。Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation。International Data Privacy Law,7(2),76-99。  new window
6.Ananny, Mike、Crawford, Kate(2018)。Seeing without Knowing: Limitations of the Transparency Ideal and Its Application to Algorithmic Accountability。New Media & Society,20(3),973-989。  new window
7.Schönberger, D.(2019)。Artificial intelligence in healthcare: a critical analysis of the legal and ethical implications。International Journal of Law and Information Technology,27(2),171-203。  new window
8.(2017)。State v. Loomis: Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Warning Before Use of Algorithmic Risk Assessments in Sentencing。Harvard Law Review,130(5)。  new window
9.Margulies, Peter(2016)。Surveillance by Algorithm: The NSA, Computerized Intelligence Collection, and Human Rights。Florida Law Review,68(4),1045-1117。  new window
10.Roth, Andrea(2016)。Trial by Machine。Georgetown Law Journal,104(5),1245-1305。  new window
11.Haidt, Jonathan(2001)。The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment。Psychological Review,108(4),814-834。  new window
12.Contini, Francesco(2020)。Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings。Law, Technology and Humans,2(1),4-18。  new window
13.Chen, Daniel(2016)。Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court Outcomes。PLoS ONE,11(10)。  new window
14.Drobak, John N.、North, Douglass C.(2008)。Understanding Judicial Decision-Making: The Importance of Constraints on Non-Rational Deliberations。Washington University Journal of Law & Policy,26(1),131-152。  new window
15.Mcgregor, Lorna(2019)。International Human Rights Law as a Framework for Algorithmic Accountability。International & Comparative Law Quarterly,68(2),309-343。  new window
16.Gleicher, Michael(2016)。A Framework for Considering Comprehensibility in Modeling。Big Data,4(2),75-88。  new window
17.Crawford, Kate、Schultz, Jason(2019)。AI Systems as State Actors。COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW,119,1941-1972。  new window
18.Wasserfallen, Fabio(2010)。The Judiciary as Legislator? How the European Court of Justice Shapes Policy-making in the European Union。Journal of European Public Policy,17(8),1128-1146。  new window
19.Perry, Melissa(2017)。iDecide: Administrative Decision-making in the Digital World。AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL,91(1),29-34。  new window
20.Tata, Cyrus、Hutton, Neil(2003)。Beyond the Technology of Quick Fixes: Will the Judiciary Act to Protect Itself and Short Up Judicial Independence? Recent Experience from Scotland。Federal Sentencing Reporter,16(1),67-75。  new window
21.Beck, Luke(2017)。The Constitutional Duty to Give Reasons for Judicial Decisions。UNSW Law Journal,40(3),923-951。  new window
22.Cohen, Mathilde(2008)。Reason-Giving in Court Practice: Decision-Makers at the Crossroads。Columbia Journal of European Law,14(2),257-276。  new window
23.Cohen, Mathilde(2015)。When Judges Have Reasons Not to Give Reasons: A Comparative Law Approach。Washington and Lee Law Review,72(2),483-571。  new window
24.Wilkinson, J. Harvie III(1989)。The Role of Reason in the Rule of Law。The University of Chicago Law Review,56(2),779-809。  new window
25.Cohen, Mathilde(2010)。Sincerity and Reason-Giving: When May Legal Decision Makers Lie。DePaul Law Review,59(4),1091-1150。  new window
26.Bosland, Jason、Gill, Jonathan(2014)。The Principle of Open Justice and the Judicial Duty to Give Public Reasons。Melbourne University Law Review,38(2),482-524。  new window
27.Eisenberg, Melvin Aron(1978)。Participation, Responsiveness, and the Consultative Process: An Essay for Lon Fuller。Harvard Law Review,92(2),410-432。  new window
28.Wald, Patricia M.(1995)。The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings。University of Chicago Law Review,62(4),1371-1419。  new window
29.Ferioli, Elena(2015)。Rule of Law and Constitutional Democracy。The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations,46,91-106。  new window
30.Tamanaha, Brian Z.(20121200)。The History and Elements of the Rule of Law。Singapore Journal of Legal Studies,232-247。  new window
31.Bracha, Oren、Pasquale, Frank(2008)。Federal search commission? Access, fairness, and accountability in the law of search。Cornell Law Review,93,1149-1210。  new window
會議論文
1.Dwork, Cynthia(2012)。Fairness Through Awareness。  new window
2.Zemel, Richard(2013)。Learning Fair Representations。  new window
研究報告
1.Van Dijk, Frans(2016)。Independence of Judges: Judicial Perceptions and Formal Safeguards。  new window
2.Tamanaha, Brian(2018)。Functions of the Rule of Law。  new window
圖書
1.Pound, Roscoe(1921)。The Spirit of the Common Law。  new window
2.法治斌、董保城(2006)。憲法新論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳庚(2003)。憲法的解釋與適用。  延伸查詢new window
4.Domingos, Pedro(2015)。The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World。  new window
5.Pasquale, Frank(2015)。The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information。  new window
6.Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie(2017)。The Rise of Big Data Policing。  new window
7.Farber, Daniel A.、Sherry, Suzanna(2008)。Judgment Calls: Principle and Politics in Constitutional Law。  new window
8.翁岳生(1997)。法治國家之行政法與司法。  延伸查詢new window
9.Posner, Richard A.(1993)。The Problems of Jurisprudence。  new window
10.(2018)。司法週刊。  延伸查詢new window
11.Gigerenzer, Gerd(2008)。Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious。  new window
12.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis(2004)。Why Deliberative Democracy?。  new window
13.Fuller, Lon(1965)。The Morality of Law。Yale University Press。  new window
14.Bingham, Tom(2011)。The Rule of Law。  new window
15.Alexy, Robert、Adler, Ruth、MacCormick, Neil(1989)。A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification。Clarendon Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Doshi-Velez, Finale,Kim, Been(20170302)。Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning,https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.08608.pdf。  new window
2.Lindquist, Stefanie A.,Cross, Frank C.(2010)。Stability, Predictability and the Rule of Law: Stare Decisis As Reciprocity Norm,https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bf6b/38da3c188flcaf7475873ela42c7dbc64c7.pdf?_ga=2.36946793.874141728.1598237063-694595277.1598237063。  new window
其他
1.Kabul, Ilknur Kaynar(20171218)。Interpretability is Crucial for Trusting AI and Machine Learning,https://blogs.sas.com/content/subconsciousmusings/2017/12/18/interpretability-crucial-trusting-ai-machine-learning/。  new window
2.AI Now Institute at New York University(2019)。AI Now Report 2019,https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2019_Report.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.林勤富、李怡俐(2020)。人工智慧時代下的國際人權法:規範與制度的韌性探索與再建構。法律思維與制度的智慧轉型。元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉靜怡(2017)。人工智慧潛在倫理與法律議題鳥瞰與初步分析--從責任分配到市場競爭。人工智慧相關法律議題芻議。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.Stein, Paul Leon(2006)。Why Judges Are Essential to the Rule of Law and Environmental Protection。Judges and the rule of law. Creating the links: Environment, human rights and poverty。  new window
4.陳淳文(2014)。釋憲機關的司法權威--由法國與我國違憲審查實務來看司法權威的建立。憲法解釋之理論與實務。  延伸查詢new window
5.Raz, Joseph(1979)。The Rule of Law and Its Virtue。The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality。  new window
6.陳弘儒(2020)。依法而治或依演算法而治。人工智慧與法律衝擊。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top