:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教育部推動高中職108課綱之後現代主義哲學省思與啟示
書刊名:明道學術論壇
作者:江素梅
作者(外文):Chiang, Sumei
出版日期:2023
卷期:15:2
頁次:頁23-38
主題關鍵詞:後現代主義教育哲學108課綱PostmodernismEducational philosophy2019 curriculum guidelines
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本文旨在探討後現代主義哲學及其對教育部推動高中職 108 課綱的啟示。作
者經由文獻閱讀及評析。首先,針對「現代」與「後現代」進行其社會演變之說
明;接著,進行後現代哲學重要內涵的探討 ;繼而綜合「後現代主義」
(Postmodernism)哲學的重要主張,將其內涵整理成為「多元性、實踐性、創新
性、素養性、藝術性、溝通性、批判與修正、資訊未來性」八個面向,精簡呈現
後現代主義的精神。接著,針對教育部推動 108 課綱教學實踐,進行後現代主義
教育哲學省思,建立「後現代哲學與 108 課綱之關聯性」對應關係,並藉由分析
近年來教育界已完成有關 108 課綱之研究,除了釐清 108 課綱所展現的優異特質
外,亦將這些調查研究所提出有待「回應與修正」之處,依「學習歷程、多元選
修、探究與實作、多元選修」分別加以論述。最後,於面對學界對 108 課綱實施
提出批判與修正意見時,國家教育政策制訂機關宜作出改進與調整,方能符合學生及家長的需要。
This article aims to discuss the philosophy of postmodernism and its enlightenment to the Ministry of Education's promotion of the 2019 curriculum guidelines of 12-year
basic education for senior high schools and vocational-technical schools. The author read
and commented on the literature. First, explain the social evolution of "modern" and
"postmodern"; then, discuss the essential connotations of postmodern philosophy; then
synthesize the critical propositions of “postmodernism” philosophy, and organize its
purposes into “Diversity,” “practicability,” “innovation,” “literacy,” “artistry,”
“communication,” “criticism and revision,” and “information futurity” condenses and
presents the spirit of postmodernism. Then, reflect on the modernist educational
philosophy after the Ministry of Education promoted the teaching practice of 2019
curriculum guidelines, and establish the relationship between “postmodern philosophy
and 2019 curriculum guidelines”. And then analyze the implementation outcomes of 2019
curriculum guidelines that other journal article writers have completed in recent years. In
addition to clarifying the excellent characteristics displayed in the 108 curriculum
guidelines, this study discusses some points that are needed to be revised according to
“the learning process”, “multiple electives”, “inquiry and practice”, and “multiple
electives” respectively. Finally, in face of criticism from the academic field on the
第 24 頁
明道學術論壇第 15 卷第 2 期
implementation of the 2019 curriculum guidelines, the author proposes that the national
education policy formulation agency should refer to the spirit of critical philosophy and
make the necessary improvements and adjustments that meet the needs of students and parents.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE