司法院大法官作成釋字第803號解釋，其中詳盡地處理了限制原住民持製獵槍與獵捕宰殺野生動物之立法的合憲性界限，大法官更是首次在釋字中，承認原住民族的文化實踐具有權利性質，本號解解對於未來原住民權利的影響極其重大，本文即以本號解釋為中心，分析原住民族文化實踐權利化後可能衍生的議題，並具體地分析大法官有關干預此項文化權利的憲法界限何在，以及其可能存在的法律過度干預或管制向度不足等疑義。

In the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 803 (2021), the Constitutional Court carefully delineates the constitutional boundaries of legislations regulating the possession of hunting rifles and the hunting of wild animals. For the first time, the Court affirms that the indigenous peoples have a right to cultural practices, which will have a far-reaching impact upon the rights of the indigenous peoples. Taking the Interpretation as a point of departure, this Article explores the potential issues following the recognition of the right to cultural practices. It analyzes the Court's view on the constitutional boundaries of government restraints on the cultural right and the problems of over-regulation and under-regulation that may arise.