職前與在職生物教師的生物教材有關能力研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	職前與在職生物教師的生物教材有關能力研究
書刊名：	師大學報
作者：	鄭湧涇／黃璧祈
出版日期：	1992
卷期：	37
頁次：	頁483-503
主題關鍵詞：	生物；在職；教材；教師；職前
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:7 點閱:15

　　　　　本研究以「生物教材能力測驗」（BSCT）為研究工具，探索我國職前及在職生物教師之生物教材能力素養概況。研究工具BSCT的內部均質性信度值為0.80，顯著高於發展該項工具時，以職前教師為樣本所求得之信度值。研究的結果顯示，職前生物教師的生物教材能力顯著優於在職生物教師（p<0.01）。就在職生物教師而言，主修生物之教師、其生物教材能力顯著優於非主修生物之教師（p<0.01）。在「分子生物學」、「植物學」和「動物學」等三個分測驗方面亦有相同的情形，惟在「生態學」分測驗方面，職前生物教師與主修生物之在職教師，其生物教材能力顯著優於非主修生物之在職教師，而職前生物教師與主修生物之在職教師之間則並無顯著差異。此外，研究的結果亦顯示，生物教材能力與生物教學能力之間有中度相關存在，且生物教材能力較佳的教師，其生物教學能力亦較佳。

以文找文

　　　　　In this study, the Biology Subject-matter Competency Test (BSCT) was used to investigate the biology subject-matter competency of the preservice (seniors) and inservice junior high biology teachers. The internal consistency reliability of the BSCT was 0.80 for the entire subjects. This value was much higher than that reported in the previous validation study in which students of preservice teacher education program were used as the subjects. Results of the study revealed that preservice biology teachers scored significantly higher on BSCT than biology teachers (p<0.01). Biology teachers who were biology major during undergraduate study scored significantly higher on BSCT than those of non-biology majors (p<0.01). These findings were also found in three of the four subtests, namely, Molecular Biology, Botany, and Zoology. In the Ecology sub-test, both preservice biology teachers and biology major teachers scored significantly higher than those of non-biology majors. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the BSCT scores obtained by preservice teachers and biology major teachers. The results of data analysis further indicated that substantially marked positive correlations were found between biology subject matter competency cores and biology teaching competency scores. The subjects with higher biology subject matter competency scored significantly better n BTCI (Biology Teaching Competency Inventory) than those with lower biology subject matter competency.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Haertel, E. H.(1991)。New forms of teacher assessment。Review of Research in Education，17，3-29。
2.	Shymansky, J. A.、Penick, J. E.(1981)。Teacher Behavior Does Make a Difference in Hands-On Science Classrooms。School Science and Mathematics，81(5)，412-422。
3.	Hashweh, M. Z.(1987)。Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics。Teaching and Teacher Education，3，109-120。
4.	Pella, Milton O.(1976)。The Place or Function of Science for a Literate Citizenry。Science Education，60(1)，97-101。
5.	Yager, R. E.、Hidayat, E. M.、Penick, J. E.(1988)。Features which separate least effective from most effective science teachers。Journal of Research in science Teaching，25(3)，165-177。
6.	Buchmann, M.(1982)。The flight away from content in teacher education and teaching。Journal of Curriculum Studies，14(1)，61-68。
7.	Broudy, H. S.(1969)。Can we define good teaching?。Teachers College Record，70(7)，583-592。
8.	DeRose, J. V.、Lockard, J. D.、Paddy, L. G.(1979)。The teacher is the key: A report on three NSF studies。The Science Teacher，46(4)，31-37。
9.	Johnson, D. W.(1969)。Influences on Teachers' acceptance of change。Elementary School Journal，70(3)，142-153。
10.	Kerr, Donna H.(1983)。Teaching Competence and Teacher Education in the United States。Teachers College Record，84(3)，525-552。
11.	Martin, J.(1979)。Effects of teacher high-order questions on student process and product variables in a single-classroom study。Journal of Educational Research，72(4)，183-187。
12.	Mechling, Kenneth R.、Stedman, C. H.、Donnellan, K. M.(1982)。Preparing and Certifying Science Teachers: An NSTA Report。Science and Children，20(2)，9-14。
13.	Quirk, T. J.、Witten, B. J.、Weinberg, S. F.(1973)。Review of studies of the National Teacher Examinations。Review of Educational Research，43(1)，89-113。
14.	Ramsey, G. A.、Howe, R. W.(1969)。An analysis of research on instructional procedures in secondary school science. Part I: Outcomes of instruction。The Science Teacher，36(3)，62-70。
15.	Shymansky, James A.(1978)。Assessing Teacher Performance in the Classroom: Pattern Analysis Applied to Interaction Data。Studies in Educational Evaluation，4(2)，99-106。
16.	O'Hearn, George T.(1976)。Science Literacy and Alternative Futures。Science Education，60(1)，103-114。
17.	鄭湧涇(19910100)。Biology Cognitive Preferences of Preservice Biology Teachers。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part D, Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education，1(1)，32-40。
18.	Blank, R. K.(1988)。Improving research on teacher quality in science and mathematics: Report of a symposium of scientists, educators, and researchers。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，25(3)，217-224。
19.	Babikian, Y.(1971)。An empirical investigation to determine the relative effectiveness of discovery, laboratory, and expository methods of teaching science concepts。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，8(3)，201-209。
20.	Champagne, A. B.、Horning, L. E.(1987)。Issues of Science teacher quality, supply, and demand。Science Education，71(1)，57-76。
21.	Hart, E.、Towes, W.(1980)。A methodology for examination of the relationship between student and teacher understanding of BSCS concepts and the BSCS conceptual framework。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，17(3)，251-256。
22.	Lamb, W. G.、Davis, P.、Leflore, R.、Hall, C.、Griffin, J.、Holmes, R.(1979)。The Effect on student achievement of increasing kinetic structure of teacher's lecture。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，16(3)，223-227。
23.	National Science Teacher Association(1984)。Recommended standards for the preparation and certification of secondary school teachers of science. An NSTA Position Statement。The Science Teacher，51(9)，57-62。
24.	Sorenson, G.、Husek, T.(1963)。Development of a measure of teacher role expectations。American Psychologist，18，389。
25.	Tobin, K.、Garnett, P.(1988)。Exemplary practice in science classrooms。Science Education，72，197-208。
26.	Tollefson, N.(1973)。Selected student variables and perceived teacher effectiveness。Education，94，30-35。
27.	Shulman, Lee S.(1986)。Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching。Educational Researcher，15(2)，4-14。
28.	Cronbach, Lee J.(1951)。Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests。Psychometrika，16(3)，297-334。
29.	Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review，57(1)，1-23。
30.	鄭湧涇、周雪美(19900600)。職前生物教師科學態度的研究。師大學報，35，249-270。延伸查詢
31.	鄭湧涇、周雪美(19910600)。職前生物教師的生物探討技能。師大學報，36，239-265。延伸查詢

會議論文
1.	Cheng, Y. J.(1986)。The evaluation of biology teaching competency。中華民國74年度科學教育學術研討會。國科會。151-183。延伸查詢
2.	鄭湧涇、周美雪、張麗珠(1989)。職前與在職生物教師對科學的本質的了解。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。257-283。延伸查詢
3.	鄭湧涇(1987)。生物教師必備教學能力研究。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。1-25。延伸查詢
4.	鄭湧涇、傅慧鳳、周雪美(1988)。生物教學能力測驗的發展與效化。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。391-424。延伸查詢

學位論文
1.	Hord, G.(1971)。Strategy for Evaluation of Teacher Classroom Behavior(碩士論文)。The University of Texas。

圖書
1.	Benderson, A.(1982)。Teacher Competence: Focus 10。Princeton, NJ：Educational Testing Service。
2.	Gage, N.(1972)。Teacher Effectiveness and Teacher Education。Palo Alto, CA：Pacific Books。
3.	Isaac, S.、Michael, W. B.(1983)。Handbook in Research and Evaluation for Education and Behavioral Sciences。San Diego, California：Edits Publishers。
4.	National Commission for Excellence in Teacher Education(1985)。A call for change in teacher education。Washington, DC：The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education。

單篇論文
1.	National Science Board Commission on Pre-college Education in Math, Science and Technology(1983)。Educating Americans for the 21st Century: A plan of action for improving math, science and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students so that their achievements the best in the world by 1995，Washington, DC。

圖書論文
1.	Bethel, L. J.(1985)。Science teacher preparation and professional development。Research Within Reach: Science Education。Washington, D.C.：NSTA。
2.	Rosenshine, B.、Furst, N.(1973)。The use of direct observation to study teaching。The Second Handbook of Research in Teaching。Chicago, Illinois：Rand McNally Company。
3.	Harms, N. C.(1981)。Project synthesis: Summary and implication for teachers。What Research Says to the Science Teachers。Washington, DC：NSTA。
4.	Koballa, T. R. Jr.(1985)。Is there substantial agreement on the goals for science instruction? If so, what are they?。Research Within Reach: Science Education。Washington, DC：NSTA。
5.	Novak, J. D.(1988)。The role of content and process in the education of science teachers。Gifted Young in Science: Potential Through Performance。NSTA。
6.	Okey, J. R.、Butts, D. P.(1982)。Linking teaching behaviors and student behaviors in science。Education in the 80's: Science。Washington, D.C.：National Education Association。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	書評：教科書專制--一個局內人揭露教材如何暗中破壞改革
2.	高中生對機率學習的態度問卷之編製與研究
3.	國小學童「科學態度」及「對科學的態度」之研究--以植物的生長教學活動為例
4.	國小英語教育發展趨勢及三「教」--教師、教材、與教法：相關問題研究
5.	職前及在職國民小學教師的天氣概念及其相關迷思概念之探究
6.	小學自然的科學態度之研究
7.	國中生物教師教學內容知識的詮釋性研究
8.	中等學校生物教師教學能力之研究
9.	職前與在職生物教師科學態度之研究
10.	國小職前教師基本自然科學知識及自然科教學態度之研究
11.	教材教具教師與語言教學
12.	國文教材的再檢討﹣﹣北區高中國文教師研習會學員心聲
13.	職前生物教師的生物探討技能
14.	職前生物教師科學態度的研究
15.	國民小學在職教師教育專業訓練班學員數學基本能力之調查分析

無相關博士論文

1.	直達式的教師在職進修並非最佳良策

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫