臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國中學生生物認知偏好之研究
書刊名：師大學報
作者：鄭湧涇／蔡在壽／黃秋純／廖碧珠
出版日期：1993
卷期：38
頁次：頁223-249
主題關鍵詞：生物認知偏好；認知偏好風格；課程評鑑；Biology cognitive preferences；Cognitive preference styles；Curriculum evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:11
　　　　　本研究發展「生物認知偏好測驗」(TBCP)，以評測台北地區國中一年 級學生之「生物認知偏好」風格，並探討生物認知偏好與性別、學校類型和學生 背景特性等相關變項之間的關係。研究結果顯示，TBCP的信度和效度考驗均稱 理想，R、P、Q、A四項認知偏好型式之內部均質性信度分別為0.86，0.79，0.90 和0.67。TBCP分數經因素分析的結果，可以抽出兩個因素，因素1代表「批判 質疑」，而因素2代表「知識應用」;四偏好型式之間的相關與因素分析均證實 了Q-R和A-P兩極軸的存在。國中一年級學生表現強烈的P偏好和較弱的R偏 好，四項型式的偏好依強弱順序排列為P(原理原則))A(應用)>Q(批判質疑)>R(記 憶)。這個結果表示學生於處理生物學資訊時，偏好鑑識原理原則，而不喜記憶 生物學知識。學生之生物認知偏好因性別和學校類型的不同而異．就生物認知偏 好之取向言，男生為P>A>R>Q，女生為A>P>Q>R。大型學校學生的R偏好顯著 低於中、小型學校學生，Q偏好則顯著高於中型學校學生;中型學校學生的P偏 好顯著高於小型和大型學校學生。學生之生物認知偏好亦有因家長職業的不同而 異的現象。此外，智力測驗分數與Q偏好型式的分數之間呈顯著之正相關，而 與R偏好型式的分數則呈額著之負相關。
　　　　　In this study, the Test of Biology Cognitive Preference (TBCP) was developed andemployed to assess the biology cognitive preference styles of the 7th grade students in Taipeiarea. The relations between biology cognitive preferences and school types and certainstudent's background characteristics were investigated. The results showed that the reliability and validity of the TBCP were satisfactory. The internal consistency reliabilities ofthe R'P Q'A modes were 0.86, 0.79, 0.90 and 0.67 respectively. Varimax factor analysis of the TBCP scores revealed two factors '. Factor I represents "Critical questioning",while factor 2 represents "Knowledge application." Both the intercorrelation among the fourcognitive preference modes and factor analysis supported the existence of two bipolar axes,namely Q-R and A-P. The subjects exhibited a strong preference for the P(Principles) mode and a weak preference for the R(Recall) mode. The rank order of the extent of preference from highest to lowest was P > A> Q > R. This indicated that the 7th graders preferred identifying principlesfrom the biological information presented to them, to memorizing biological facts. There were significant differences in biology cognitive preferences between male and female subjects, and among student groups of different school types. The males exhibited apreference order of P >A>R> Q, while the females exhibited a preference order of A > P> Q > R. Students of large schools exhibited a lower preference for the R mode than thoseof small and medium schools, and exhibited a higher preference for the Q mode than thoseof medium schools. Students of medium schools had a higher preference for P mode thanthose of small and large schools. Significant differences in biology cognitive preferenceswere also found among students grouped by parents' occupations. In addition, the I.Q. scoreswere positively correlated with Q mode and negatively correlated with R mode.
期刊論文
1.Cronbach, L. J.(1951)。Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test。Psychometrika，16(3)，297-334。  new window
2.Pella, Milton O.(1976)。The Place or Function of Science for a Literate Citizenry。Science Education，60(1)，97-101。  new window
3.Tamir, P.(1985)。Meta-analysis of cognitive preference and learning。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，22(1)，1-17。  new window
4.Atwood, R. K.(1968)。A cognitive preference examination using chemistry content。JRST，5(1)，34-35。  new window
5.Barnett, H. C.(1974)。An investigation of relationships among biology achievement, perception of teacher style, and cognitive preferences。JRST，11(2)，141-147。  new window
6.Brown, S. A.(1975)。Cognitive preferences in science: Their nature and analysis。Studies in Science Education，2，43-65。  new window
7.Fazio, F.、Zambotti, G.(1977)。Some cognitive style variables and their relationships to chemistry achievement。Journal of College Science Teaching，6(3)，154-155。  new window
8.Heath, R. W.(1964)。Curriculum, cognition and educational measurement。Educational & Psychological Measurement，24(2)，239-253。  new window
9.Jungwirth, E.(1980)。Alternative interpretations of findings in cognitive preference research in science education。Science Education，64(1)，85-94。  new window
10.Kempa, R. F.、Dube, G. E.(1973)。Cognitive preference orientations in students of chemistry。British J. of Educational Psychology，43，279-288。  new window
11.Mackay, L. D.(1972)。Changes in cognitive preferences during two years of study in Victorian schools。Australian Science Teacher J.，18，63-66。  new window
12.Robinson, J. T.(1969)。Philosophy of science: Implications for teacher education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，6，99-104。  new window
13.Tamir, P.(1975)。The relationship among cognitive preference, school environment, teachers' curricular bias, curriculum, and subject matter。AERJ，12(3)，235-264。  new window
14.Tamir, P.(1976)。The relationship between achievement in biology and cognitive preference style in high school students。British J. Educational Psycholology，46，57-67。  new window
15.Tamir, P.(1977)。A note on cognitive preferences in science。Studies in Science Education，4，111-121。  new window
16.Tamir, P.(1981)。Validation of cognitive preferences。British Educational Research Journal，7(1)，37-49。  new window
17.Tamir, P.(1988)。The relationship between cognitive preferences, student background and achievement in science。JRST，25(3)，201-216。  new window
18.Tamir, P.、Kempa, R. F.(1978)。Cognitive preferences styles across three science disciplines。Science Education，62(2)，143-152。  new window
19.Tamir, P.、Lunetta, V. N.(1977)。A comparison of ipsative and normative procedures in the study of cognitive preferences。The Journal of Educational Research，71(2)，86-92。  new window
20.Tamir, P.、Jungwrith, E.(1984)。Test scores and associations as measures of cognitive preferences。Studies in Educational Evaluation，10，149-158。  new window
21.van den Berg, E.、Lunetta, V. N.、Tamir, P.(1982)。The convergent validity of the cognitive preference construct。JRST，19(5)，417-424。  new window
22.O'Hearn, George T.(1976)。Science Literacy and Alternative Futures。Science Education，60(1)，103-114。  new window
23.Hicks, L. E.(1970)。Some properties of Ipsative, Normative, and Forced-choice Normative measures。Psychological Bulletin，74(3)，167-184。  new window
24.鄭湧涇(19910100)。Biology Cognitive Preferences of Preservice Biology Teachers。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part D, Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education，1(1)，32-40。  new window
25.Rost, J.(1983)。Cognitive preferences as components of student interest。Studies in Educational Evaluation，9，285-302。  new window
26.Tamir, P.、Kempa, R. F.(1977)。College students' cognitive preferences in science。The Journal of Educational Research，70，210-218。  new window
27.鄭湧涇、黃秋純、蔡在壽、廖碧珠(19930300)。國中一年級學生的科學認知偏好。科學教育學刊，1(1)，51-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Atwood, R. K.(1971)。Development of a cognitive preference examination utilizing general science and social sciences。JRST，8，273-275。  new window
29.Daugs, D. R.(1970)。Scientific literacy: Re-examined。The Science Teacher，37(8)，10-11。  new window
30.Tamir, P.(1977)。The relationship between cognitive preferences of students and their teachers。Curriculum Studies，9(1)，67-74。  new window
31.Tamir, P.、Lunetta, V. N.(1978)。Cognitive preference in biology of a group of talented high school students。JRST，15(1)，59-64。  new window
32.van den Berg, E.、Lunetta, V. N.、Tamir, P.(1978)。Cognitive preferences: A validation study。Studies in Educational Evaluation，4(2)，107-120。  new window
33.Witkin, Herman A.、Moore, C. A.、Goodenough, D. R.、Cox, P. W.(1977)。Field-Dependent and Field-Independent: Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications。Review of Educational Research，47(1)，1-64。  new window
學位論文
1.van den Berg, E.(1978)。Cognitive preferences: A Validation Study(博士論文)。The University of Iowa，Iowa City, Iowa。  new window
2.Boehlke, P. R.(1984)。Cognitive Preference and Science Teaching Behavior(博士論文)。The University of Iowa，Iowa City, Iowa。  new window
圖書
1.Guilford, J. P.、Fruchter, B.(1978)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心(1986)。教育部中小學科學教育環境調查研究：課程教材評鑑計畫。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：995（臺灣：991，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67908955
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上