:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:祝堯「古賦辯體」的賦論
書刊名:故宮學術季刊
作者:鄧國光
出版日期:1994
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁119-132
主題關鍵詞:祝堯古賦辯體辭賦文章流別集Chu yaoKu-fu Pien-tiFuTz'u-fuWen-chang Lia-pieh-chi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
     辭賦衍至宋、元,體格大備,而傳世作品交沓,蕪莠雜陳,整理與總結,時機已至。元代延祐初年復舉業,試士以古賦,辨賦體格已為時代的必須。祝堯編纂的《古賦辯體》十卷便是因應時代的要求的辭賦總集。是集選載戰國以迄宋六十一家凡一二九篇作品,以時序排次,於正集八卷類區為楚辭體、兩漢體、三國六朝體、唐體和宋體,於外錄二卷別選五類賦體的變格;每一體類、作品以及作者,祝堯都表示了批評的意見。這種總集和批評結合的模式,遠紹西晉摯虞《文章流別集》,近則取法晁、朱的楚辭學,啟導明清兩代賦論以及辨體批評。祝堯賦論就辨體批評、賦本確立,古體回歸及六義釐析四方面,倡導以抒述怨思的小賦為古賦的大體。以發展及辯證的意識總結辭賦的演變,而且自具嚴整的理論架構,實唐宋以後文論的奇葩。
     In terms of style and structure, the Chinese tz'u fu had developed into a full-blown literary genre by the Sung (960-1279) and Yuan (1260-1368) dynasties. The re-emergence of civil-service examinations during the Yen-yu reign (1314-1321) of the Yuan period even made a profound understanding of this particular form of prose poetry a must in the intellectual arsenal of budding literati seeking appointments of official posts. Further, as tz'u fu compositions of mixed qualities abounded in the literary world of the time, the need for a systematic review of existing works had never been more obvious. It was under these circumstances that the Yuan scholar Chu Yao (n.d.) compiled the Ku-fu Pien-ti, an anthology of ten volumes of 129 tz'u fu pieces by 61 authors from the Warring States (403-221 B.C.) to the Sung. Arranged in a chronological order the main body of the compilation provides in eight volumes extensive coverage of classics in the Ch'u-tz'u and workds from the Han (202 B.C.-A.D. 220), the Three Kingdoms (220-265) and the Six Dynasties (220-589), the T'ang (618-907), and the Sung epochs. Compositions in the variant forms of these styles, on the other hand, are presented in the two supplementary volumes. It is worth noting, though, that the intent of the Ku-fu Pien-ti is by no means confined to offering a collection of essential pieces; its scope, to be sure, is of a broader type, as the comiler himself had rendered where posible a significant number of remarks in the critical vein. When adopting the approach of juxtaposing the original pieces and the critiques in one sigle collection, Chu Yao had apparently embraced the general framework of the Wen-chang Liu-pieh-chi of Chih Yu (d.331) and the philosopohies underlying the Ch'u-tz'u studies of Ch'ao Pu-chih (1053-1110) and Chu Hsi (1130-1200). By examining representative compositions through the agen from four distinctive perspectives, Chu Yao was able to recapitulate the evolution of the poetic genre of tz'u fu and to substantiate the claim that the predominant mode of exposition had been one that was short and expressive of lamentable sorrows or emotional states. A rare and outstanding literary study with a carefully constructed theoretical foundation, Chu Yao's review and critical analysis had laid the groundwork for undertakings of and identical nature during the Ming (1368-1644) and Ch'ing (1644- 1912) dynasties.
圖書
1.廣信府志。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃成助、斐大中、秦緗業(1970)。無錫金匱縣志。成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃虞稷(1967)。千頃堂書目。臺北:廣文書局出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳訥(1982)。文章辨體序說。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱熹(1972)。楚辭集注。香港:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1967)。江西通志。臺北:華文書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.祝堯。古賦辨體。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃宗羲、全祖望、王梓材、馮雲濠、陳金生、梁運華(1986)。宋元學案。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.元史。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.錢大昕(1986)。補元史藝文志。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.宋史.藝文志。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.葉幼明(1991)。辭賦通論。長沙:湖南教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.班固(1962)。漢書。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄧國光(1990)。摯虞研究。香港:學衡出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉勰、王利器(1980)。文心雕龍校證。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳振孫、徐小蠻、顧美華(1987)。直齋書錄解題。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊明照(1987)。從《文心雕龍》看中國古代論史、論、評結合的民族特色。中國古代文論研究方法論集。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top