:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Constructing Three-Dimensional Mental Models from Viewing Two-Dimensional Displays
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:襲充文 引用關係黃世琤 引用關係
作者(外文):Shyi, Gary Chon-wenHuang, Tina Shih-tseng
出版日期:1995
卷期:37:2
頁次:頁101-122
主題關鍵詞:心像模型複雜度觀察點性別差異Mental modelsObject complexityViewpointSex differences
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:16
     當受試者看到一個立體物的平面式直角投射圖並詢以這些圖是否來自於同一個立 體物時,他們傾向以建構立體物的三度空間心像模型的方式來解答。在本研究中我們檢驗( 1 )在何種情況下比較有可能建構立體的心像模型; ( 2 )所建構的心像模型的本質為何 ;及( 3 )男女在建構立體心像模型的能力上有無差異。 實驗中,受試者依序解答兩項作 業。首先是直角相容作業:在此作業中,受試者需要判斷在兩張連續畫面上出現的三張直角 投射平面圖,是否代表同一個立體物體。第二項作業為未預警之再認作業:在此作業中,受 試者被要求指認螢幕上所呈現的立體圖形是否在先前之相容作業中曾經出現。當受試者正確 解答相容作業且亦能在後續的再認作業中指出與相容作業中對應之立體圖形為曾經出現的物 體 -- 此項列聯機率被視為受試者利用平面訊息建構立體心像模型的證據。結果顯示,( 1 )對於低複雜度的物體,受試者較易以建構立體模型為解題策略;而對高複雜度的物體,受 試者則易傾向以分析特徵和比對的策略解題; ( 2 )當所呈現的已知平面圖中包括物體的 正前方投射圖時,受試者較能建構立體模型,反之則否; 及( 3 )雖然在相容作業上男生 的表現優於女生,但是沒有證據顯示二者在建構立體心像模型的能力上有差異。這些結果有 助於澄清在何種情境中較易建構立體心像模型以及由平面訊息所建構之立體心像模型的特性 為何等問題。
     When subjects were presented with 2-D orthographic projections of a 3-D object and asked to judge whether or not the projected views were compatible with one another in the sense of representing an identical object, they tended to solve the problem by constructing a 3-D mental model of the object out of the 2-D displays. In the present study, we examined (a) the conditions under which 3-D mental models were more or less likely constructed; (b) the nature of constructed mental model, and (c) sex differences in the ability of 3-D model construction. Subjects were asked to perform two tasks in sequence. In the first, orthographic compatibility task, they were asked to judge whether or not the three orthographic views of a block object (made of small cubes) presented in two consecutive frames represented an identical object. In the second, incidental recognition task, subjects were asked, without warning, to determine if the orthographic projection of the isometric drawing of a 3-D object appeared earlier in the compatibility task. The contingent probability of correctly recognizing a 3-D object given its compability problem was also solved correctly was taken as the evidence that subjects solved the compatibility problems by constructing 3-D models from 2-D displays. Results show that (a) subjects were more likely to use a construction strategy when solving problems that were relatively simple and were more likely to adopt an analytic, feature-matching strategy when solving problems that were relatively complex, and (b) subjects were more successful at constructing 3-D models when the first two views provided in the compatibility task contained an orthographic projection of the front side of the object than when they did not, and (c) although males tended to outperform females in solving compatibility problems, no evidence for male superiority in constructing 3-D mental models was found. The implications of these findings were discussed in terms of the conditions under which 3-D mental models are likely to be constructed as well as the characteristics of a 3-D model once it is constructed.
期刊論文
1.Tarr, M. J.(1995)。Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects。Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2(1),55-82。  new window
2.Hummel, J. E.、Biederman, I.(1992)。Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition。American Psychological Association,99(3),480-517。  new window
3.Cooper, L. A.(1990)。Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,16(6),1097-1106。  new window
4.Just, M. A.、Carpenter, P. A.(1985)。Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability。Psychological Review,92(2),137-10。  new window
5.Marr, D.、Nishihara, H. K.(1978)。Representation and recognition of three dimensional shapes。Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B,200,269-294。  new window
6.Biederman, I.(1987)。Recognition-By-Components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding。Psychological Review,94(2),115-147。  new window
7.Biederman, I.、Cooper, E. E.(1991)。Priming Contour-Deleted Images: Evidence For Intermediate Representations in Visual Object Recognition。Cognitive Psychology,23,393-419。  new window
8.Kerr, N. H.(1987)。Locational representation in imagery: The third dimension。Memory & Cognition,15(6),521-530。  new window
9.Bethell-Fox, C. E.、Shepard, R. N.(1988)。Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,14,12-23。  new window
10.Koriat, A.、Norman, J.(1984)。What is rotated in mental rotation?。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,10,421-434。  new window
11.Gibson, B. S.、Peterson, M. A.(1994)。Does orientation-independent object recognition precede orientation-dependent recognition? Evidence from a cuing paradigm。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,20,299-316。  new window
12.Rock, I.、Wheeler, D.、Tudor, L.(1989)。Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints?。Cognitive Psychology,21,185-210。  new window
13.Klopfer, D. S.(1985)。Constructing mental representations of objects from successive views。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,11,566-582。  new window
14.Shepard, R. N.、Metzler, J.(1971)。Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects。Science,171(3972),701-703。  new window
15.Biederman, I.、Gerhardstein, P. C.(1993)。Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,19,1162-1182。  new window
16.Hunt, E. B.、Pellegrino, J. W.(1985)。Using interactive computing to expand intelligence testing: A critique and prospectus。Intelligence,9(3),207-236。  new window
17.Tarr, M. J.、Pinker, S.(1989)。Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition。Cognitive Psychology,21,233-282。  new window
研究報告
1.Huang, S.-T.、Shyi, G. C.-W.(1995)。A study of spatial ability of scientifically gifted students: Constructing three-dimensional mental models from two-dimensional displays (計畫編號:NSC84-0111-S194-003)。Taiwan, R. O. C.。  new window
圖書
1.Cooper, L. A.、Shepard, R. N.(1982)。Mental images and their transformations。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Kosslyn, Stephen M.(1980)。Image and mind。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Halpern, Diane F.(1992)。Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Baddeley, A.(1986)。Working memory。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Dixon, W. J.(1992)。BMDP statistical software manual。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
6.Maccoby, E. E.、Jacklin, C. N.(1974)。The psychology of sex difference。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
7.Marr, D.(1982)。Vision。San Francisco, CA:W. H. Freeman Company。  new window
8.Levy. J. U.、Levy, N.(1992)。Mechanical aptitude and spatial relations tests。New York:Prentice-Hall。  new window
9.Kosslyn, S. M.(1994)。Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate。MIT Press。  new window
10.Rock, I.(1983)。The logic of perception。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lohman, D. F.(1988)。Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge。Advances in the psychology of human intelligence。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Biederman, I.(1990)。Higher-level vision。Visual cognition and action。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
3.Carpenter, P. A.、Just, M. A.(1986)。Spatial ability: An information processing approach to psychometrics。Advances in the psychology of human intelligence。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
4.Cooper, L. A.、Mumaw, R. J.(1985)。Spatial aptitude。Individual differences in cognition。NY:Academic Press。  new window
5.Yulli, A. L.、Ullman, S.(1990)。Computational theories of low-level vision。Visual cognition and action。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
6.Cooper, L. A.(1988)。The role of spatial representations in complex problem solving。Cognition and representation。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
7.Cooper, L. A.(1989)。Mental models of the structure of visual objects。Object perception: Structure and process。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
8.Cooper, L. A.(1991)。Dissociable aspects of the mental representation of visual objects。Mental images in human cognition。Amsterdam, Netherlands:Elsiever Science Publishers。  new window
9.Pellegrino, J. W.、Hunt, E. B.(1991)。Cognitive models for understanding and assessing spatial abilities。Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE