資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.217.67.183)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Reflections Upon the Curricular Reform of School Science for Taiwan in Transition
書刊名:
臺中師院學報
作者:
蘇育任
作者(外文):
Su, Yu-jen
出版日期:
1996
卷期:
10
頁次:
頁337-366
主題關鍵詞:
中小學
;
自然科學
;
課程
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:20
過去這十多年來,臺灣在政治、經濟、社會以及文化各方面,均遭遇到前所未有之重大變化。為因應這些急劇的改變並滿足整體社會需求,社會大眾群起投注心力改革教育,促使科學教育全面進行檢討與革新。 尤有進者,一項由「國際教育進步評鑑會」主辦之最新報告指出,臺灣學生對於所教過之數理科常用的歷程表現良好,卻拙於將所學知識應用在日常生活中,導致目前社會上有許多壓力,要求教育必須培養公民能妥善運用科學知識的能力。 職是之故,我國中小學自然科課程乃依據下列因素,重新加以規劃設計: (一)我國科學教育之政策;(二)當前社會狀況與文化背景;(三)科學哲學之最新見解,亦即自然科學的本質與概念系統;(四)當代心理學與科學社會學的理論;以及(五)學生個人的能力、興趣和需求。 本文旨在設法從社會學、心理學與哲學的觀點,提出研究者個人對臺灣自然科學課程改革之省思並予以綜合歸納。唯探討課程改革,牽涉因素十分繁複,必須運用一個聯貫且整全之課程理論實施課程評鑑,方有助於撰寫論文,並進一步溝通相關知識。Phenix首倡之哲學理論,經Yager與Hofstein考量科學事業各種特徵,戮力改進衍化,已成科學課程理論之嶄新見解;本文即據之評量臺灣此次新課程的改革。
以文找文
Over the past ten years, Taiwan has experienced tremendous changes in different aspects of political, social and cultural dimensions. To cope with the rapid changes and demands of the whole society, a general thrust of public attentive for educational innovation has come to the foreground which gives added dimensions to the environment in which science teachers presently operate. What is more, a recent survey by the IAEP(International Assessment of Educational Progress) reported that the school pupils in Taiwan were good at the routine processes of natural sciences and mathematics which they had been taught, but weak in applying their knowledge to real life situations. There has been more and more current social pressures to make better use of the knowledge of the sciences. A new curriculum for school science has therefore been planned and designed on considerations of the following factors: (a) our national policies in science education; (b) our social situations and cultural traditions; (c) the conceptual systems and the nature of natural science (the philosophy of science); (d) the current theories in psychology and the sociology of science; and (e) the individual abilities, interests and demands of students. The main purpose of this present paper is trying to summarize my personal reflections upon the curricular reform of school science in Taiwan after critical re-examinations from societal, psychological and philosophical arguments. Since explorations of curricular reform raises matters of great complexity and, to assist in the formalization and communication of the relevant knowledge, a unified and holistic theory is necessary for the evaluation of ideas, conceptions and theories relevant to curricular reform. The new views of curriculum in science advanced by Yager and Hofstein, originally conceived by Phenix, which considers many dimensions that characterizes the enterprise of science, will be used to evaluate this curricular reform in Taiwan.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Chau, K. C.、Lee, T. Y.、Yand, W. K.(1989)。The development status and prospective of science education in the Republic of china。Science Education Monthly,116,2-28。
2.
Cross, B. E.、Molnar, A.(1994)。Global issues in curriculum development。Peabody Journal of Education,69(4),131-140。
3.
Driver, R.、Bell, B. F.(1984)。The children's learning in science project。Education in Science,108,19-20。
4.
Leithwood, K.、Menzies, T.、Jantzi, D.(1994)。Earning teachers' commitment to curriculum reform。Peabody Journal of Education,69(4),38-61。
5.
Yager, R. E.、Hofstein, A.(1986)。Features of a quality curriculum for school science。Journal of Curriculum Studies,18(2),133-146。
6.
Giroux, H. A.(1994)。Teachers, public life, and curricular reform。Peabody Journal of Education,69(3),35-47。
7.
Huang, C. J.(1990)。The important trends in the junior high school curriculum。Science Education Monthly,132,12-30。
8.
Leinhardt, G.(1992)。What research on learning tells about teaching。Educational Leadership,49(7),20-25。
9.
Klein, M. F.(1994)。The toll for curriculum reform。Peabody Journal of Education,69(3),19-34。
10.
Omstein, A. C.(1994)。Curriculum trends revisited。Peabody Journal of Education,69(4),4-20。
11.
Olson, J.(1981)。Teacher influence in the classroom: a context for understanding Curriculum translation。Instructional Science,10,259-275。
12.
Wei, M. T.(1990)。An investigation into the goals' current status and problems of science education in Taiwan。Science Education Monthly,126,2-8。
13.
Yang, J. H.(1992)。What can we learn from the evaluation report of the IAEP?。Science Education Monthly,149,1-27。
14.
Wen, M. L.(1995)。Taiwan's modernization: a case of lack of autonomy in education。Bulletin of Graduate Institute of Education,36,229-251。
15.
Wei, M. T.(1991)。The innovation of school curriculum。Science Education Monthly,142,2-13。
16.
Yang, S. K.(1995)。Post traditional identity and cultural pluralism。Bulletin of Graduate Institute of Education,36,215-228。
研究報告
1.
TPIFESTIE(1988)。An Investigation into the Environment of Elementary Schools Science Education。Taipei:Taiwan Provincial Institute For Elementary School Teachers' In-service Education。
2.
TPIFESTIE(1993)。The Introduction to the New Curriculum in Elementary School Science。Taipei:Taiwan Provincial Institute For Elementary School Teachers' In-service Education。
3.
TPIFESTIE(1989)。An Survey Study on the Relevancy of Current Science Curriculum in the Elementary Schools。Taipei:Taiwan Provincial Institute For Elementary School Teachers' In-service Education。
圖書
1.
Brandwein, P. F.(1981)。Memorandum: On Renewing Schooling and Education。New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。
2.
Bacharach, S. B.(1990)。Education Reform: Making Sense of It All。Allyn & Bacon。
3.
Arnold, P. J.(1988)。Education, Movement and the Curriculum。London:The Falmer Press。
4.
Dufour, B.(1990)。The New Social Curriculum。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
5.
Dalton, T. H.(1988)。The Challenge of Curriculum Innovation: A Step of Ideology and Practice。London:The Falmer Press。
6.
Choate, J. S.、Bennett, T. Z.(1987)。Assessing and Programming Basic Curriculum Skills。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。
7.
Finn, C. E. Jr.、Rebarber, T.(1992)。Education Reform in the 90's。N. Y.:Macmillan Publishing Company。
8.
ERCMOE(1989)。The Draft of the Conceptualizations to Extend the National Basic Education to 12 Years。Taipei:The Ministry of Education。
9.
Ellis, A. K.、Mackey, J. A.、Glenn, A. D.(1987)。The School Curriculum。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。
10.
Huang, C. J.(1993)。Curriculum Design。Taipei:Tung-hua Boole Company。
11.
Head, C. J.(1985)。The Personal Response to Science。Cambridge:New York:Cambridge University Press。
12.
Hargreaves, A.(1989)。Curriculum and Assessment Reform。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。
13.
Goodson, I.(1993)。School Subjects and Curriculum Change。London:The Falmer Press。
14.
Lawton, D.(1986)。School Curriculum Planning。Kent:Hodder and Stoughton Ltd.。
15.
Kelly, A. V.(1986)。Knowledge and Curriculum Planning。London:Harper & Row Ltd.。
16.
MOE(1995)。The Curriculum Standards of Elementary Schools。Taipei:Ministry of Education of the Republic of China。
17.
MOE(1993)。The Curriculum Standards of Elementary Schools。Taipei:Ministry of Education of the Republic of China。
18.
Mau, S. L.(1989)。BILOG: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models [Computer program]。Taipei:Taiwan Provincial Institute For Elementary School Teachers' In-service Education。
19.
Marshall, P.(1988)。Transition and Continuity in the Educational Process。London:Kogan Page Ltd.。
20.
Phenix, P. H.(1964)。The Realms of Meaning: A Philosophy of the Curriculum for General Education。New York:McGraw-Hill Company。
21.
MOE(1995)。The Curriculum Standards of the Junior High Schools。Taipei:Ministry of Education of the Republic of China。
22.
Stenhouse, L.(1978)。An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development。London:Heinemann Educational Book, L。
23.
Shepherd, G. D.、Ragan, W. B.(1992)。Modem Elementary Curriculum。N. Y.:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publisher。
24.
SEC of NTNU(1989)。The Research Report of Assessment in the Curriculum and Instructional Materials in the Middle Schools。Taipei:The Science Education Center of the National Taiwan Normal University。
25.
SEC of NTNU(1988)。The Technical Report of the Science Education Direction Committee of the Ministry of Education。Taipei:The Science Education Center of the National Taiwan Normal University。
26.
Wallace, M.、McMahon, A.(1994)。Planning for Change in Turbulent Times。London:Cassell Publication Company。
27.
TPIFESTIE(1993)。The Guidelines for Natural Science Curriculum Design in Elementary School。Taipei:Taiwan Provincial Institute For Elementary School Teachers' In-service Education。
28.
Yager, R. E.(1982)。What Research Says to the Science Teacher。Washington, D. C.:National Science Teachers Association。
29.
Finch, C. R.、Crunkilton, J. R.(1993)。Curriculum Development in Vocational and Technical Education: Planning, Content, and Implementation。Allyn and Bacon。
30.
Marsh, C. J.(1992)。Key concepts for understanding curriculum。Falmer Press。
31.
Bruner, Jerome S.(1966)。Toward a theory of instruction。Harvard University Press。
圖書論文
1.
Peterson, P. L.、Knapp, N. F.(1993)。Inventing and reinventing ideas: constructivist teaching and learning in mathematics。Challenges and Achievements of American Education。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
科學師資的培育
2.
中國大陸中小學課程的歷史淵源考略
3.
A Curriculum Evaluation on the New Primary School Science for Taiwan in Transition
4.
美國中小學營養教育課程架構之比較
5.
我國中小學課程的現況與展望
6.
近二十年我國國民中學自然科學課程之發展
7.
我國現階段中小學公民教育課程目標之研究
8.
現行國小自然科學課程「物體與物質」概念單元的比較分析
9.
師資培育課程中「國民小學自然科學教學模式」之研究
10.
美國中小學健康教育新課程計畫:兼述在我國之適用性
11.
中小學科學課程中「物質的粒子概念」之研究
無相關博士論文
1.
鄉土教育的理論與實踐
2.
日本中小學課程發展與新學力評量觀點之分析
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code