資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.129.70.244)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Tai Chen and Revivalism during the Ch'ien-Lung and Chia-Ch'ing Eras (1736-1820 A.D.)
書刊名:
銘傳學刊
作者:
李哲賢
作者(外文):
Lee, Jer-shiarn
出版日期:
1997
卷期:
8
頁次:
頁191-211
主題關鍵詞:
考證學
;
復古主義
;
理學
;
道學
;
漢學
;
訓詁
;
Evidential research
;
K'ao-cheng hsueh
;
Revivalism
;
Neo-confucianism
;
Han learning
;
Hsun-ku
;
Etymology
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:40
本文主要在探究乾嘉學者,尤其是戴震,在重建原始儒學之努力。本文共分三部份 : (一)乾嘉時代之復古主義:乾嘉學風以考證知名。之所以如此,主要乃針對宋、明理學家 之詮釋儒學而來。由於不滿宋、明學者哲學思辯之研究儒學典籍、而未能把握原始儒學之真 貌,乾嘉學者乃轉而以考證之方式來研究儒家之原典。雖然,乾嘉考證學風之興起與理學有 關,但考證學實不應視為僅是對宋、明理學之反動或理學之承續而已,它實代表一種自我意 識之努力,乃欲恢復原始儒學之真貌,並強化儒學之傳統。 (二)戴震之思想發展:戴氏雖被視為乾嘉時代最重要之考證學者之一,然戴氏為學之旨趣 實不侷限於此。戴氏與其他考證學者不同的是,前者視考證僅為彰顯儒學真相之手段而非目 的;而後者則視考證本身為目的,亦即為考證而考證也。因此,戴氏為學實超出考證學之外 ,而欲以哲學之方法來彰顯儒學之原貌。其哲學著作,如,緒言、原善及孟子字義疏證,即 表明其在此方面努力之成績,其目的即欲以本身之哲學來取代宋明理學。 (三)戴氏之哲學信念及方法:戴氏明言其治學乃以明道為目的,而明道則需由考古釋文始 。故其為學方法乃是一語言學或訓詁之方法,亦即欲以訓詁之方法來研究哲學之問題,並以 之作為彰顯原始儒學真相之最佳方法也。
以文找文
The paper will focus on the attempt of Tai Chen and his contemporaries to reevaluate and verify key texts and concepts belonging to the Confucian tradition. My paper consists of three sections. 1.Revivalism in the Ch'ien-Chia Era:Rejecting the philosophical speculations of Neo-Confucianism, scholars in the eighteenth century searched for evidence of Classics, and favored a returen to the ancient Confucian sources in order to reconstruct the classical tradition. However, k'ao-cheng scholarship became more than merely a reaction against Neo-confucianism. It represented a self-conscious effort to restore the objective truth of the confucian Classics, and to strengthen the confucian tradition. Ⅱ.Tai Chen's intellectual development:Tai chen was known as a leading proponent of the k'ao-cheng school, however, he differed in an important way from other k'ao-cheng scholars of his time. Unlike his contemporaries, who pursued k'ao-cheng scholarship for its own sake, Tai Chen regarded it as primarily a means of revealing the truth.Moreover, he was regarded as a philosopher rather than as merely a k'ao-cheng, or textual, scholar. In this respect, his philosophical writings reflect an attempt to substitute his own philosophy for the sung philosophy of Principle(li-hsueh). Ⅲ.Tai Chen's Philosophical Beliefs and Approach:Tai Chen's philosophical writings indicate the impact phiology had on philosophical issues. The methodology Tai Chen adopted was essentially linguistic, that is, hsun-ku (etypmology, lit., "glossing"). The merit of this methodology was its precision in defining the meaning of key terms in the Classics, and this in turn had important ramifications for the understanding of the traditional systems of belief.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
羅文(19761200)。Philology, An Aspect of Sung Rationalism。Chinese Culture Quarterly,17(4),1-26。
圖書
1.
Chien, Edward T.(1986)。Chiao Hung and the Restructuring of Neo-Confucianism in the Late Ming。New York:Columbia University press。
2.
Elman, Benjamin A.(1984)。From philosophy to philology。Harvard University Press。
3.
Hummel, Arthur W.(1943)。Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period, 1644-1912。Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office。
4.
Hucker, Charles O.(1985)。A Dictionary of Official Titles in Imperial China。Stanford:Stanford University Press。
5.
Chang, Carson(1962)。Development of Neo-Confucian Thought。New York:Bookman Associates。
6.
Hu, Shih(1971)。The Philosophy of Tai Chen。Taipei:Shang-wu yin-shu kuan。
7.
Ch'ien, Mu(1976)。Intellectual History of China during the Last 300 Years。Taipei:Shang-wu yin-shu kuan。
8.
Ma, Tsung-huo(1979)。A History of Chinese Classical Studies。Taipei:Shang-wu yin-shu kuan。
9.
P'i, Hsi-jui(1966)。History of Classical Studies。Taipei:I-win yin-shu kuan。
10.
Liu, James T. C.(1976)。Ou-vang Hsiu: An Eleventh-Century Neo-Confucianist。Stanford:Stanford University Press。
11.
Liang, Ch'i-ch'ao(1972)。Intellectual Trends in the Ch'ing Period。Taipei:Shang-wu yin-shu kuan。
12.
Liang, Ch'i-ch'ao(1973)。Essays on Modem Chinese Scholarship。Hong Kong:Ch'ung-wen shu-tien。
13.
Cheng, Chung-ying(1971)。Chen's Inquiry into Goodness。Hawaii:University of Hawaii Press。
14.
Chang, Hsueh-ch'eng(1974)。General Meaning of Literature and History。Taipei:Shih-hsueh ch'u-pan she。
15.
Tuan, Yu-ts'ai(1971)。A Chronological Biography of Mr. Tai Chen。Hong Kong:Ch'ung-wen shu-tien。
16.
Liang, Chfi-ch'ao(1972)。An Introduction to the Scholarship in the Ch'ing period。Taipei:Shang-wu yin-shu-kuan。
17.
Juan, Yuan。Ancient Glosses on Nature and External Necessity。
18.
Chiao, Hsun。Orthodox Meaning of the Book of Mencius。
19.
Lee, Jer-shiam(1993)。Chang Ping-lin (1869-1936): A Political Radical and Cultural Conservative。Taipei:Wen-shih-che ch'u-pan sh。
20.
Chan, Wing-tsit(1963)。A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy。Princeton University Press。
21.
Chin, Ann-Ping、Freeman, Mansfield(1990)。Tai Chen on Mencius: Explorations in Words and Meaning。New Haven:Yale University Press。
圖書論文
1.
Ch'ien, Edward T(1975)。Chiao Hung and the Revolt Against Ch'eng-Chu Orthodoxy。The Unfolding of Neo-Confucianism。New York:Columbia University Press。
2.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.(1960)。Neo-Confucianism and Neo-Legalism in T'ang Intellectual Life, 755-805。The Confucian Persuasion。Stanford:Stanford University Press。
3.
Yu, Ying-shi(1978)。A New Interpretation of the Intellectual History of the Ch'ing Period。Thought and History。Taipei:Lien-ching ch'u-pan she。
4.
Chan, Wing-tsit(1987)。Chu Hsi's Completion of Neo-Confucianism。Chu Hsi: Life and Thought。Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press。
5.
de Bary(1953)。A Reappraisal of Neo-Cofucianism。Studies in Chinese Thought。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。
6.
Tai, Chen。Evidential Analysis of the Meanings of Terms in the Book of Mencius。Complete Works of Mr. Tai Chen。Taipei:Ta-hua shu-chu。
7.
Tai, Chen。A Letter to Someone。Complete Works of Mr. Tai Chen。Taipei:Ta-hua shu-chu。
8.
Hui, Tung(1972)。Preface to the Ancient Meanings of the Nine Classics。Intellectual Trends in the Ch'ing Period。Taipei:Shang-wu yin-shu kuan。
9.
Tai, Chen。A Letter to Yao Chi-chuan。Complete Works of Mr. Tai Chen。Taipei:Ta-hua shu-chu。
10.
Tai, Chen。Preface to Someone's Fishing for the Sunken in Explanation of the Ancient Classics。Complete Works of Mr. Tai Chen。Taipei:Ta-hua shu-chu。
11.
Tai Chen。A Reply to Cheng Yung-mu's Letter。Complete Works of Mr. Tai Chen。Taipei:Ta-hua shu-chu。
12.
Tai, Chen。Reply to Chin-shih P'eng's Letter。Complete Works of Mr. Tai Chen。Taipei:Ta-hua shu-chu。
13.
Chang, Ping-lin(1985)。Interpretation of Tai Chen's Thought。Complete Works of Chang T'ai-yen。Shanghai:Jen-min ch'u-pan she。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
從理學到道學到宋學--宋明新儒學(Neo-Confucianism)概念的受容及其研究視域
2.
清代中晚期以來方東樹詩文著作的流傳及其影響
3.
論朱熹「理學家」的稱謂考辨
4.
由訓詁通義理:以戴震、章太炎等人為線索論清代漢學的哲學方法
5.
南宋學者對北宋理學社群之建構--以朱熹《伊洛淵源錄》為觀察核心
6.
從陽明「良知不妨有異」說起--宋代以下「道」觀念的個體化現象
7.
「內聖外王」考略
8.
「屏除門戶,一洗糾紛」--論紀昀對漢宋之爭的持平之見(2)
9.
「屏除門戶,一洗糾紛」--論紀昀對漢宋之爭的持平之見(1)
10.
嚴粲《詩緝》新探--從經學、理學與文學三重面向作全方位之考察
11.
嘉道以降漢學家思想轉變一例--讀丁晏頤志齋文集
12.
The Unravelling of Neo-confucianism:From Philosophy to Philology in Late Imperial China
1.
諸儒鳴道與道學之再檢討
2.
阮元經學之研究
1.
"屏除門戶, 一洗糾紛"--論紀昀對漢宋之爭的持平之見
2.
清代禮教思潮與考證學--從三禮館看乾隆前期的經學考證學兼論漢學興起的問題
3.
道學
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code