The purpose of this article is to analyze the provisions concerning compensatory damages in Chapter Ⅴ of Fair Trade Law. Following an introduction, Part Ⅱ inquires into the social background of Fair Trade Law; for instance, Monopolization, cartel, and boycotts are so popular in the market that Civil Law cannot effectively regulate the situation of restrictive trade. Part Ⅲ investigates the sources of legislative mode in Fair Trade Law. Part Ⅳ discusses the modification of general principles from Civil Law to Fair Trade Law, it contains from the principles of Honesty and good Faith to allocative efficiency, from individual right to institutional safeguard, from Absolute Ownership and Freedom of Contract to their limitation, from fault liability to liability without fault, from the compensation to deterrence. Part Ⅴ researches the interpretation and application to Chapter Ⅴ of Fair Trade Law, such as its protection object, obligor, claimant, causation, amount in controversy. Part Ⅵ examines into the fundamental legal issues between Fair Trade Law and Civil Law. One attempts to investigate the effect of a juristic act at breaching an imperative or prohibitive provision in Fair Trade Law. The other intends to criticize the right De lege lata to claim the punitive damage and solatium simultaneously in a view of legislative policy. Part Ⅶ concludes by offering a new perspective concerning the future of Tort Law in Taiwan.