:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同動作觀察對羽球高手擊長球技能學習效果之探討
書刊名:國立體育學院論叢
作者:石昌益 引用關係
作者(外文):Shih, Chang-yi
出版日期:1998
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁203-221
主題關鍵詞:羽球高手擊長球技能學習效果
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:15
     本研究以私立吳鳳工商專校 84 名五專女生為研究對象,將之平均分配於自觀組 、他觀組、綜觀組與控制組等四個不同動作觀察組別內,接受六週、每週二小時的羽球高手 擊長球技能實驗教學,並於學習前、後皆舉行測驗,且於完成後測間隔兩週再舉行保留測驗 ,所得資料用以探討各組學生其羽球技能學習效果、保留效果,並進而比較其差異情形。在 本研究範圍內經討論分析獲致下列結論: 一、他觀組與綜觀組其羽球高手擊長球技能的學習效果均顯著優於控制紅( P<.05 )。 二、在介入兩週的休息後,綜觀組與控制組的高手擊長球均呈現復憶現象,其餘皆具良好的 保留效果。 三、在介入兩週的休息後,自觀組與綜觀組其羽球高手擊長球技能的保留效果皆顯著優於他 觀組( P<.05 )。
     The objects of the study were 84 junior college female students of Wu- Feng Junior College. We divided them into self-observing, others-observing, synthetic-observing and control group different motion observation groups. The training period was two hours a week for six weeks badminton forehand overhead clear experimental training. All groups had to take pretest and protest for this training. Moreover, after two weeks of protest, they need to take retention test again. all the data were used in discussion about their learning effect and retention effect in order to compare their difference. The final conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. The learning effect of the forehand overhead clear of the others-observing group and the synthetic-observing group was better than that of the control group. (P<.05) 2. After taking a two-week break, the forehand overhead clear of the synthetic-observing group and control group were in reminiscence, the others had good retention effect. 3. After taking a two-week break, the retention effect of the forehand overhead clear skill of the self-observing group and the synthetic-observing group was better than that of the others-observing group. (P<.05)
期刊論文
1.George, T. R.、Felta, D. L.、Chase, M. A.(1992)。Effects of model similarity on self-efficacy and muscular endurance: A second log。Journal of Sport Psychology,14,237-248。  new window
2.Gould, D.、Weiss, M.(1981)。The effects of model similarity and model talk on self-effficacy and muscular endurance。Journal of Sport Psychology,3,17-29。  new window
3.Landers, Donna M.、Landers, Daniel M.(1973)。Teacher versus peer models: Effects of model's presence and performance level on motor behavior。Journal of Motor Behavior,5(3),129-139。  new window
4.Lirgg, C. D.、Feltz, D. L.(1991)。Teacher versus peer models revisited: Effects on motor performance and self-efficacy。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,62,217-224。  new window
5.Martens, R.、Burwitz, L.、Zuckerman, J.(1976)。Modeling effect on motor performance。Research Quarterly,47,277-291。  new window
6.杜登明(19851200)。羽球運動技能因子構造之分析研究。體育學報(省體專),14,71-131。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Singer, Robert N.(1968)。Motor learning and human performance。MacMillan Company。  new window
2.Singer, R. N.(1972)。The Psychomotor Domain。Philadelphia:Lea & Fabiger CO.。  new window
3.Meinel, K.、金子明友(1981)。マイネル・スポーツ運動学。東京:大修館書店。  延伸查詢new window
4.Verducci, F. M.(1980)。Measurement concepts in physical education。St. Louis:C.V. Mosby Company。  new window
5.許樹淵(1988)。運動技術教學法。臺北市:偉彬體育研究社。  延伸查詢new window
6.林清山(1980)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Social Learning Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
8.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fitts, P.(1962)。Factors is complex skill training。Training research and education。Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
2.Landers, D. M.(1975)。Social faciliation and human performance: A review of contemporary and past research。Psychology of sport and motor behavior。University Park:Penn State Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top