本研究問卷在調查臺灣高等教育學校對於公私立及類別不同學校是否採用評鑑標 準評估老師教學表現，以及探究其使用程度。由於教學表現的評估使學校老師得以提升其專 業上的成長，而且，合理而適當的教學評估對於改善高等教育的品質有極大助益，由此更能 顯示出本研究之必要性及其重要性。本研究對於高等教育學校公私立制及類別不同學校使用 評鑑標準情形及使用程度，以問卷調查方式探究其差異性，研究結果可作為提升對當前高等 教育學校老師表現評估的瞭解，進而作為學校老師升等之重要參考依據。 由五十二所四年制大學及學院中一百三十五位學校行政主管為選樣， 回收率達 73.33%，問 卷內容包括十三項評鑑標準，採行 Likert 方式量表的五種不同程度量化每項評鑑標準，每 項評鑑標準數值愈高，表示愈常使用該項評鑑標準來評估老師之教學。 本研究採用 SPSS 軟體進行各項統計分析工作， 所有的數據資料以 ANOVA （ Analysis of Variance ）測試其結果。 研究結果顯示教學表現評估以學術研究及文章發表為最主要評鑑 標準，另外，結果顯示私立大學（ M=41.28 ）比公立大學（ M=37.79 ）較常採用評鑑標準 來評估老師之教學表現。 未來相關研究之建議包括每五年類似研究應持續進行，以因應實際現況，探知當前學校採用 評鑑標準評估老師教學表現情形；研究結果亦建議未來相關研究仍可使用相同問卷內容，唯 有樣本對象可變更為學校老師。

　　　　　This study surveyed four-year colleges and universities in Taiwan to determine if the criteria used to evaluate faculty performance in teaching based on the control and classification levels of institution. Recently, evaluation of teaching perfromance and reasonable evaluation procedure were utilized to improve the quality of higher education. Therefore, it indicates the significance and necessity of this paper. The finding resules may be utilized to enhance the reader's knowledge of current faculty's teaching performance evaluation and relative to faculty promotion and salary. The subjects were 135 chief academic officers and deans of institutions selected from 52 four-year colleges and universities. A total of 99 (73.33%) of the subjects responded to the survey. The survey instrument contained the major part focusing on the evaluation of teaching performance. The questionnaire was comprised of thirteen general criteria. Each criterion was measured by a Likert-type scale with five degrees. The higher the item was rated on the scale, the more it was utilized in the evaluation of faculty perfromance at respondent institutions. In this paper, the SPSS statistic software was utilized for data analysis. ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was conducted to examine total ratings for individual items. Analysis of the results indicated that teaching performance was based primarily on scholarly research and publication. And criteria used to evaluate teaching performance ranked higher among private four-year universities (M=41.28), and lower among public four-year universities(M=37.79). Suggestions for further research included replicating this study every five years to remain current about the practices and procedures, also replicating this study by using the existing instrument but by changing the population to individual faculty members.