:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:清世宗《大義覺迷錄》重要觀念之探討
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:邵東方
作者(外文):Shao, Dongfang
出版日期:1999
卷期:17:2=34
頁次:頁61-89
主題關鍵詞:大義覺迷錄清世宗雍正華夷之辨正統君臣之義Ta-yi-chueh-mi-luEmperor Yung-chengSinicizationPolitical legitimacyLoyalty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:83
     滿清統治者入關後,逐漸認識到單憑軍事和政治的高壓是不可能長久地統治中國 ,必須通過有效的意識形態政策,來馴服漢人,尤其是漢族知識分子。祇有如此,滿清政權 才能在思想層次上為漢族士人所接受。清世宗因曾靜反清案而刊布的《大義覺迷錄》,就是 體現滿清統治者從武力征服轉向思想統治的通盤政策,以及反映滿人政治意識自覺的典型事 例。針對漢族士人否定異族統治的觀念,雍正皇帝一方面主張天命觀以緩和士人的復明思想 ,另一方面宣揚清朝的「得統之正」。同時他通過鼓吹儒家的忠義倫理,把君臣之義置於華 夷之辨的觀念之上。本文旨在論證:清朝的武力壓制和政治強權等外緣的因素不足以解釋, 為什麼明亡之後大多數漢族知識分子轉而接受滿清王朝統治的合法性;清朝的統治能夠獲得 成功是有其內在的思想理論動機的。雍正在《大義覺迷錄》中的種種辯說,不僅有其政治意 義,更具有一種文化的意義。
     This article addresses certain key concepts promoted by Emperor Yung- cheng in the Ta-yi-chueh-mi-lu in his ideological justification of the Manchu rule over China. Aside from helping with military suppression and political control, ideology played an important role in the Ch'ing success. By employing orthodox Confucian theories and related concepts, Yung-cheng aimed to justify his political ideas by means of his symbolic discourse with Ming loyalists like Tseng Ching. To protect andexp and the Manc u's political rule in China, Yung-cheng fostered an image of political legitimacy for himself as a legitimate successor of the Ming Dynasty. Yung-cheng also played an active role in the reconstruction of the relationship between the Han Chinese and the Manchu race, revealing his awareness of the problem of locating the meaning of "Manchu" itself. The article examines the theoretical implications of such notions as "Sinicization," "political legitimacy" and the "loyalty of the subject to the ruler" in unders tanding the Manchu's claims forpolitical legitimacy, and relates these concepts to the political despotism expressed during his rule. Yung-cheng's articulation of these notions in the process of consolidating political order was written in order to chal-lenge the popular Ming loyalists' arguments against Manchu rule. By situating his notions in their contemporary social and political context,it can be seen how Yung-cheng successfully presented the Ch'ing dynasty as the legitimate occupant of the imperial throne. Through his ability to "capitalize" on the intellectual favor of Ming loyalists, Yung-cheng demonstrated the importance placed on honoring Confucian doctrines during the Manchu's rule over China. A special attempt to reconcile the differences between the Han Chinese and the Manchus may be seen in Yung-cheng's interpretation of Sinicization. The great significance of the Ta-yi-chueh-mi-lu lies in the fact that the "winner" helped to set the ideological agenda concerning the orthodoxy of the Manchu st ate over the next two centuries.
圖書
1.劉家和(1995)。古代中國與世界。武漢。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳寅恪(1981)。唐代政治史述論稿。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.王夫之(1975)。讀通鑑論。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.顧炎武、黃汝成、秦克誠(1994)。日知錄集釋。湖南長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳寅恪(1980)。柳如是別傳。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.宋濂(1976)。元史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.簡又文(1962)。太平天國全史。香港:簡氏猛進書屋。  延伸查詢new window
8.朱熹、郭齊、尹波(1996)。朱熹集。四川教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.北平故宮博物院文獻館(1986)。清代文字獄檔。上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
10.左丘明、楊伯峻(1981)。春秋左傳注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.班固、顏師古、西北大學歷史系、傅東華(1962)。漢書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.司馬光、胡三省、標點資治通鑑小組(1956)。資治通鑑。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.安部健夫(1971)。清朝と華夷思想。清代史の研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉家和(1994)。古代部分上編。世界史。北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.馮天瑜(1984)。明清文字獄述略。明清文化史散論。武漢。  延伸查詢new window
16.(1964)。異民族統治中國史。異民族統治中國史。北京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)愛新覺羅胤禛(1983)。大義覺迷錄,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)王夫之(1992)。黃書,長沙。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1980)。論語,北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1980)。孟子,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)丘濬(1963)。世史正綱,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1980)。公羊傳,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.尚書。  延伸查詢new window
8.(西漢)司馬遷(1959)。史記,北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)蔣良騏(1981)。東華錄,天津。  延伸查詢new window
10.〈宋〉黃裳(1992)。雍正與呂留良,上海。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top