:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:反傾銷制度與公共利益
作者:陳財家
作者(外文):TsaiChia Chen
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:國際貿易學系
指導教授:蔡英文
陳坤銘
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2001
主題關鍵詞:反傾銷公共利益貿易移轉學習效果資本市場事件研究法共同體利益條款Anti-dumpingPublic InterestTrade DiversificationLearning EffectCapital Market Event Study ApproachCommunity Interest
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
當國際經貿日趨整合下,具相當爭議性的反傾銷制度,在貿易政策中扮演愈來愈重要的角色,如何在反傾銷制度中調和各方相關利益,已成為當前各國重要的議題。本文首先建構基本理論模型、接著實證檢測我國反傾銷個案,藉由相關經貿理論、制度、法律判例及實務的論證,評析反傾銷制度與公共利益。從理論與實務面探討台灣的應用與可行性,以作為制度修正的參考。
一、反傾銷、貿易移轉、學習效果與公共利益
反傾銷措施提供差異化的貿易限制措施,引發其他非受傾銷控訴進口品的趁機而入,產生貿易移轉效果。在邊際成本固定的情況下,非受反傾銷控訴進口品的貿易移轉效果將使得生產者剩餘減小、消費者剩餘獲得改善、公共利益變小。若非受反傾銷控訴進口品具有相當的成本優勢,本國同類產品廠商亦可能因提出反傾銷控訴而受到傷害。若本國同類產品具有相當的成本優勢,反傾銷措施在保護生產者的同時,消費者未必受到傷害,甚至可能將從反傾銷措施中獲益。當本國新興產業藉由第 1 期反傾銷措施的保護效果,調整經營體質,於第 2 期以學習效果再與進口品競爭。其中第 2 期學習效果於保護生產者的同時、消費者亦能從反傾銷措施的學習效果中獲益。而反傾銷措施的全期效果將使生產者剩餘及關稅收入因而增加、消費者剩餘則不確定。
二、反傾銷對台灣相關廠商市場價值的影響─資本市場事件研究法應用
綜合我國反傾銷制度自實施以來的鋼鐵、石化、紙業、紡織及半導體業等產業相關個案,實證結果發現我國反傾銷措施似有助於保護國內生產廠商,而反傾銷控訴若保護了上游廠商,其下游業者不必然受到傷害。此實證結果支持策略學派學者及第二章理論模型有關反傾銷政策的論點。主要的實證結論如下:
在國內廠商實際受到傾銷傷害時,反傾銷措施似有助於保護國內生產廠商。傾銷情況明顯之個案,反傾銷措施對於提出控訴案廠商股票報酬率通常有正面效應;而對於傾銷情況不明顯之個案,通常則沒有顯著影響。非受傾銷控訴進口品的貿易移轉效果影響反傾銷措施的保護效果。亦即本國同類產品廠商若欲採取反傾銷控訴應對所有傾銷進口提出控訴,才能獲取較佳的反傾銷效果。而新興產業藉助反傾銷措施似可獲致不錯的保護效果。反傾銷的保護效果因業者的不同經營型態而有所差異;而反傾銷對於競爭力較弱的產業有較佳的效果。
反傾銷措施對於提出控訴案廠商下游業者股票報酬率,不必然帶來負面效應,有時也可能出現正面效應。反傾銷控訴案若保護了上游廠商,其下游業者不必然受到傷害,須視國內外市場結構與廠商規模經濟等因素而定。
三、歐體反傾銷制度共同體利益條款研究─兼論台灣的應用與可行性分析
傳統理論認為反傾銷措施雖有保護生產者的功能,但卻會對下游構成傷害。然依理論模型與實證結果,反傾銷措施似有助於保護國內生產廠商,其下游業者亦不必然受到傷害。因此,我國反傾銷制度似乎需要「國家整體經濟利益」條款,用以評估及平衡相關利益。依民國 89 年 7 月 14 日核定的實施辦法修正條文第 16 條第 2 項已試圖納入公共利益條款,其雖係參酌歐體反傾銷制度共同體利益條款,但與歐體制度的強制性規範與明確的釋義實有相當的差距。「國家整體經濟利益」條款的設計係用以修正保護特定產業的效果,然於主管機關的裁量增加時,反傾銷程序的公開、透明化與監督則益加重要。而實施辦法修正條文亦未規定主管機關如何執行「國家整體經濟利益」條款,若財政部關稅稅率委員會與相關機關充份合作,綜合判斷相關利益,則可有效達成「國家整體經濟利益」條款的立法目標。其中,貿易調查委員會為主要的認定機構於執行產業損害認定調查時,透過嚴謹的問卷設計及公聽會程序,衡量反傾銷措施對於使用者產業與消費者利益的衝擊;並聽取公平會對於業者是否濫用反傾銷措施的評估,由財政部關稅稅率委員會綜合作成課徵反傾銷稅與否或降低反傾銷稅額的最終判斷。
參考文獻
中文書籍
左峻德與楊秀玲 (1998),《課徵反傾銷稅對產業影響之研究》,經濟部貿易調查委員會。
林可涵 (1998),《反傾銷制度與公司價值─台灣鋼鐵業之實證研究》,國立政治大學國際貿易學系碩士論文。
林彩瑜 (2001) ,《貿易救濟制度法規研修規劃小組─法規研修報告》,頁 32-56 ,經濟部貿易調查委員會。
陳坤銘與楊光華 (1999),《反傾銷制度與產業保護效果─台灣個案研究》,經濟部貿易調查委員會。
蔡英文 (1990) ,〈反傾銷法〉,《國際貿易法專題研究》,頁 229-269 ,國立政治大學法律學系。new window
中文期刊論文
台灣區鋼鐵工業同業公會 (1995-2000) ,《鋼鐵資訊》,第 62-125 期,台灣區鋼鐵工業同業公會。
金成隆 (1999) ,〈台灣上市公司盈餘 / 股價關聯性之研究〉,《中山管理評論》,第 7卷,第 1 期,頁 81-100 ,國立中山大學管理學術研究中心。new window
周賓凰與蔡坤芳 (1997) ,〈台灣股市日資料特性與事件研究法〉,《證券市場發展季刊》,第 9 卷,第 2 期,頁 1-27 ,證券暨期貨市場發展基金會。
黃立 (1996),〈歐體的新反傾銷法〉,《進口救濟論叢》,第 9 期,頁 323- 354。
陳坤銘與陳財家 (1999),〈反傾銷與股價─台灣鋼鐵產業個案研究〉,《台灣經濟學會一九九九年會論文集》,頁 71-101 ,台灣經濟學會。
蔡英文 (1992),〈反傾銷法與差別待遇之比較〉,《公平交易季刊》,創刊號,民國 81 年,頁 57-74。new window
蔡英文 (1994),〈從世界貿易組織 (WTO) 反傾銷協定看我國反傾銷制度〉,《進口救濟論叢》,第 4 期,頁 5-11。
蔡英文 (1999),〈反傾銷法制的重新定位─兼論我國反傾銷稅制下所衍生的產業問題〉,《商事法暨財經法論文集》,頁 815-841 。new window
英文書籍
Bael, I. and J.F. Bellis (1990), Antidumping and Trade Protection in the EEC, Oxford: CCH.
Beseler, J.F. and. A.N. Williams (1986), Anti-Dumping and Anti-Subsidy Law: The European Communities, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.
Boltuck, R. (1991), Assessing the Effects on the Domestic Industry of Price Dumping, in P.K.M. Tharakan (ed.), Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures.
Boltuck, R. (1994), Innovation in Support of the Unitary Injury Test in U.S. Unfair Trade Case, Trade Resources Company, Washington, D.C.
Bourgeois, J.H.J. and P. Demaret (1995), The working of EC policies on competition, industry and trade: a legal analysis, in P. Buigues, A. Jacquemin and A. Sapr (eds.), European Policies on Competition, Trade and Industry: Conflict and Complementarites, Edward Elgar, Alderhotuk.
Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1984), Tariff protection and imperfect competition, in H. Kierzkowski ed., Monpolistic Competition and International Trade, 194-206, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Campbell, J.Y., A.W. Lo, and A.C. MacKinlay (1997), The Econometrics of Financial Markets, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Deardorff, A.V. (1987), Safeguards policy and the conservative social welfare function, in H. Kierzkowski ed., Protection and Competition in International Trade, 22-40, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Deardorff, A.V. (1989), Economic perspectives on antidumping law, in J.H. Jackson and E.A. Vermulst eds., Antidumping Law and Practice, 23-39, N.Y.: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Ethier, W.J. (1993), An antidumping law with a distorted home market, in H. Herberg and N.V. Long (eds.), Trade,Welfare, and Economic Policies: Essays in Honor of Murray C. Kemp, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Fama, E.F. (1976), Foundations of Finance, New York: Basic Books.
Finger, J.M. and T. Murray (1993), Antidumping and countervailing duty enforcement in the United States, in J. Michael Finger (ed.), Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt, 241-254, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Gilson, R.J. and B.S. Black (1995), The Law and Finance of Corporate Acquisitions, Westbury: New York, The Foundation Press.
Glance, Simon (1995), Compas Model Document, CITT Research Branch.
Haberler, G. (1937), The Theory of International Trade with its Application to Commercial Policy, London: William Hodge and Co., Ltd.
Muller, W., N. Khan, and H. Neumann (1998), EC Anti-Dumping Law-A Commentary on Regulation 384/96, John Wiley&Sons Ltd.
OECD (1984), International Trade and the consumer, Report on the 1984 OECD Symposium.
Prusa, T.J. (1996), The Trade Effect of US Antidumping Action, NBER working paper N. 5440.
Prusa, T.J. (1999), On the Spread an Impact of Antidumping, NBER working paper N. 7404.
USITC (1995), The Economic Effects of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders and Suspension Agreements, Investigation No.332-344.
Vandesbussche, H., J. Konings and L. Springael (1999), Import Diversion under European Antidumping Policy, NBER working paper N. 7340.
Vermulst, E.A. (1987), Antidumping Law and Practice in the United States and the European Communities, Elseview Science Pub..
Viner (1950), The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York
Viner, J. (1966), Dumping: A Problem in International Trade, N.Y.: Augustus M. Kelley.
Wares, W.A. (1977), The Theory of Dumping and American Commercial Policy, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
WTO Annual Report 1999, http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/anrep_e/anre99_e.pdf;
WTO Annual Report 2000, http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/anrep_e/anre00_e.pdf.
英文期刊論文
Armitage, S. (1995), Event study methods and evidence on their performance, Journal of Economic Surveys, 8, 25-52.
Anderson, J. (1992), Domino dumping, I: competitive exporters, American Economic Review, 82, 65-83.
Anderson, J. (1993), Domino dumping, II: anti-dumping, Journal of International Economics, 35, 133-150.
Anderson, S.P., N. Schmit and J.F. Thisse (1995), Who benefits from antidumping legislation?, Journal of International Economics, 38, 321-337.
Barcelo, J.J. (1972), Antidumping laws as barriers to trade:the United States and the international antidumping code, Cornell Law Review, 57, 491-499.
Bernhofen, D.M. (1995), Price dumping in intermediate good markets, Journal of International Economics, 39, 159-173.
Bian, J. and G. Gaudet (1997), Anti-dumping laws and oligopolistic trade, Journal of Economic Integration, 12, 62-86.
Binder, J. (1985), On the use of the multivariate regression model in event studies, Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 370-383.
Binder, J. (1998), The event study methodology since 1969, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 11, 111-137.
Blonigen, B.A. and Y. Ohno (1999), Endogenous protection, foreign direct investment and protection-building trade, Journal of International Economics, 46, 205-227.
Bollerslev, T., R.Y. Chou, and K.F. Kroner (1992), ARCH modeling in finance, Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5-59.
Bourgeois, J.H.J. (1989), Anti-trust and trade policy: a peaceful co-existence? European Community perspective-I, International Business Lawyer, 58-66.
Brander, J.A. and P.R. Krugaman (1983), A ''reciprocal dumping'' model of international trade, Journal of International Economics, 15, 313-323.
Bronckers, M.C.E.J. (1996), Rehabilitating antidumping and other trade remedies through cost-benefit analyses, Journal of World Trade, 30, 5-37.
Clarida, R.H. (1993), Entry, dumping and shakeout, America Economic Review, 180-202.
Clough, M. (1992), Conflicts between EEC anti-dumping and competition law, European Competition Law Report, 15, 222-225.
Davies, S.W. and A.J. McGuinness (1982), Dumping at less than marginal cost, Journal of International Economics, 12, 169-182.
Dick, A.R. (1991), Learning-by-doing and dumping in the semiconductor industry, Journal of Law and Economics, 34, 133-159.
Dixit, A.K. (1988), Anti-dumping and countervailing duties under oligopoly, European Economic Review, 32, 55-68.
Economist (1998), Against anti-dumping, The Economist, 349(8093).
Ethier, W.J. (1982), Dumping, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 487-506.
Ethier, W.J. and R.D. Fischer (1987), The new protectionism, Journal of International Economic Integration, 2, 1-11.
Fama, E.F., L. Fisher, M.C. Jensen, and R. Roll (1969), The adjustment of stock prices to new information, International Economic Review, 10, 1-21.
Feinberg R.M. and S. Kaplan (1993), Fishing downstream: the political economy of effective administrative protection, Canadian Journal of Economics, 26, 150-158.
Fischer, B.S. (1973), The antidumping laws of the United States: a legal and economic analysis, Law and Policy in International Business, 5, 88.
Finger, J.M., H.K. Hall, and D.R. Nelson (1982), The political economy of administered protection, American Economic Review, 72, 452-466.
Finger, J.M. and T. Murray (1991), Policing unfair imports: the United states example, Journal of World Trade, 24, 39-55.
Fischer R. (1992), Endogenous probability of protection and firm behavior, Journal of International Economics, 32, 149-163.
Gallaway, M.C., Blonigen, B.A., and Flynn, J.E. (1999), Welfare costs of the U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws, Journal of International Economics, 49, 211-244.
Gruenspecht, H. (1988), Dumping and dynamic competition, Journal of International Economics, 25, 225-248.
Harper, R.K. and W.L. Huth (1997), Japanese equity market response to U.S. administered decisions, Managerial and Decision Economics, 18, 11-26.
Hartigan, J.C. (1994a), Dumping and signaling, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 69-81.
Hartigan, J.C. (1995), Collusive aspects of cost revelation through antidumping complaints, Journal of International and Theoretical Economics, 151, 478-489.
Hartigan, J.C, P.R. Perry, and S. Kamma (1989), The injury determination category and the value of relief from dumping, Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 183-186.
Hillman, A.L. and E. Katz (1986), Domestic uncertainty and foreign dumping, Canadian Journal of Economics, 19, 403-416.
Hoekman, B.M. and P.C. Mavroidis (1996), Dumping, antidumping and antitrust, Journal of World Trade, 30, 27-52.
Hughes, J.S., S. Lenway, and J. Rayburn (1997), Stock price effects of U.S. trade policy responses to Japanese trading practices in semi-conductors, Canadian Journal of Economics, 30, 922-942.
Lahiri, S. and J. Sheen (1990), On optimal dumping, Economic Journal, 100, 127-136.
Lang, J.T. (1988), Reconciling European Community antitrust and antidumping, transport and trade safeguard policies-practical problems, Fordham Corporate Law Institute, 7-1~7-90.
Lasagni, A. (2000), Does country-targeted anti-dumping policy by the EU create trade diversion?, Journal of World Trade, 34, 137-159.
Leidy, M.P. and B.M. Hoekman (1990), Production effects of price and cost based antidumping laws under flexible exchange rates, Canadian Journal of Economics, 23, 873-895.
Maclean, R.M. and R.J. Eccles (1999), A change of style not substance: the community''s new approach towards the community interest test in anti-dumping and anti-subsidy law, Common Market Law Review, 36, 123-148.new window
Messerlin, P.A. (1990), Anti-dumping regulations or pro-cartel law? The EC chemical cases, The World Economy, 13, 465-492.
Miranda, J., R.A. Torres and M. Ruiz (1998), The international use of antidumping─1987-1997, Journal of World Trade, 32, 5-71.
Prusa, T.J. (1992), Why are so many Antidumping petition withdrawn?, journal of International Economics , 33, 1-20.
Reitzes, J.D. (1993), Antidumping policy, International Economic Review, 34, 745-763.
Sleuwaegen, L., R. Belderbos and C. Jie-A-Joe (1998), Cascading contingent protection and vertical market structure, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 697-718.
Staiger, R. and F. Wolak (1992), The effect of domestic antidumping law in the presence of foreign monopoly, Journal of International Economics, 32, 265-287.
Stegemam, K. (1985), Anti-dumping policy and the consumer, Journal of World Trade, 19, 466-484.
Tharakan, P.K.M. (1999), Is anti-dumping here to stay?, The World Economy, 22, 179-206.
Tharakan, P.K.M., E. Vermulst and J. Tharakan (1998), Interface between anti-dumping policy and competition policy: a case study, The World Economy, 21, 1025-1060.
Tsai, Ing-wen (1996), Trade reform in the context of rigorous competition laws and policies: case of Chinese Taipei, p.28.
Vermulst, E. (1997), Adopting and implementing anti-dumping laws─some suggestions for developing countries, Journal of World Trade, 31, 5-23.
Vermulst, E. and B. Driessen (1997), New battle lines in the anti-dumping war, recent movement on the European front, Journal of World Trade, 31, 135-157.
Veugelers, R. and H. Vandenbussche (1999), European anti-dumping policy and the profitability of national and international collusion, European Economic Review, 43, 1-28.
Webb, M. (1992), The ambiguous consequences of anti-dumping laws, Economic Inquiry, 30, 437-448.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE