臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：注意力攫取：刺激顯著性與注意力設定的交互作用
作者：李金鈴
作者(外文)：Jing-Ling Li
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：心理學研究所
指導教授：葉素玲
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2003
主題關鍵詞：注意力攫取；突現刺激；顯著性；新物件；注意力設定；不注意視盲作業；視覺搜尋作業；線索導引作業；attentional capture；onset；salience；new object；attentional control setting；inattentional blindness task；visual search task；cuing task
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:55
對於突然出現的刺激（簡稱突現）可以攫取注意力的現象，在文獻上有三種解釋，分別是新物件假說、顯著性假說以及注意力設定假說。前兩者認為突現可以產生刺激引發式的注意力攫取，亦即在任何作業中都可以觀察到突現攫取現象。但這些證據被質疑混淆了三個變項：目標呈現相關的注意力設定、受試者可能使用策略、以及過濾虧損。本研究的目的有三：（1）測試突現可否產生刺激引發式的注意力攫取，（2）若突現可造成刺激引發式的注意力攫取，則進一步檢驗新物件假說或顯著性假說何者較能解釋突現攫取的現象，（3）探索支持注意力設定假說的證據中為何沒有刺激引發的成分。實驗一以不注意視盲作業排除突現成為目標呈現相關注意力設定的可能性，實驗二以視覺搜尋作業將注意力設定在顏色向度，並排除策略和過濾虧損的混淆。兩個實驗的結果都發現突現可以攫取注意力，且都支持顯著性假說。實驗三在線索導引作業中操弄線索至目標的呈現時距以及線索顯著性，結果發現線索必須夠顯著才能攫取注意力，其攫取效果隨時距變化而變化。本研究的結論是：（1）突現可以產生刺激引發式的注意力攫取。（2）支持顯著性假說，而非新物件假說。（3）在線索作業中可以觀察到刺激引發式的攫取的效果。最後並提出一個整合式的模型來解釋本研究的結果以及過去的文獻。
The phenomenon of attentional capture by abrupt onset has been explained by three hypotheses: the new object hypothesis, the salience hypothesis, and the attentional control setting hypothesis. The former two hypotheses suggest that onset can capture attention in a stimulus-driven fashion. Their evidence, however, was questioned to have confounded with three variables: display-wide attentional setting, strategy, and filtering cost. The goal of this study is three-fold: (1) to examine whether there is stimulus-driven attentional capture by onset when all the confounding variables are excluded, (2) If an onset can capture attention in a stimulus-driven fashion, whether the salience hypothesis or the new object hypothesis better explains the results, and (3) to explore whether there can also be stimulus-driven capture by onset using a cueing task that has been mainly used to obtain results supporting the attentional control setting hypothesis. In Experiment 1, the inattentional blindness task was adopted to exclude possible display-wide setting on onsets. In Experiment 2, the visual search task with attentional setting on color was used and the possible confounding of strategy and filtering cost were avoided. Results of these two experiments showed that an onset could capture attention and the salience hypothesis was supported. In Experiment 3, the cue-to-target SOA was varied in a spatial cuing task. Results showed that a salient incontingent cue captured attention, and the effect was varied with SOAs. We conclude that: (1) Attentional capture can be purely stimulus-driven, (2) the salience hypothesis is supported, and (3) stimulus-driven capture can also be observed in a cueing task. An integrated model is proposed to explain the results.
李仁豪與葉素玲（付梓中）。選擇注意力：選空間或選物體？應用心理研究。
陳上文（1998）。視覺空間注意力的選擇基礎。國立中正大學心理研究所未發表之博士論文。
Anstis, S. M. (1980). The perception of apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 290, 153-168.
Arnott, S. R., Pratt, J., Shore, D., I., & Alain, C. (2001). Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 383-395.
Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., & Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: attentional set for perceptual transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 594-606.
Atkinson, J., & Braddick, O. (1989). ‘where’ and ‘what’ in visual search. Perception, 18, 181-189.
Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. W. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
Braddick, O. J. (1980). Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 290, 137-151.
Braun, J. (2000). It’s great but not necessarily about attention. Psyche, 7, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v7/psyche-7-06-braun.html.
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
Bundesen, C. (1991). Visual selectio of features and objects: is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen’s (1985) findings. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 87-89.
Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (1999). ANOVA and trend analysis statistical program for cognitive experiment. Research in Applied Psychology, 1, 229-246.
Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1024-1037.
De Valois R. L., & De Valois K. K. (1993). A multi-stage color model. Vision Research, 33, 1053-1065.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural Mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
Downing, P. E., & Treisman, A. M. (1997). The line-motion illusion: attention or impletion？ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 768-779.
Dulany, D. E. (2000). Inattentional awareness. Psyche, 7, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v7/psyche-7-05-dulany.html.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Di Lollo, V., Rauschenberger, R., & Yantis, S. (2001). New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1287-1302.
Folk, C. L., & Annett, S. (1994). Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 277-287.
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1996). When knowledge does not help: limitations on the flesibility of attentional capture. In A. F., Kramer, M. G. H., Coles, & G. D., Logan (Eds.). Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 271-298), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858.
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture perduces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741-753.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: a reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 682-685.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-239.
Gellatly, A., & Cole, G. (2000). Accuracy of target detection in new-object and old-object displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 26, 889-899.
Gellatly, A., Cole, G., & Blurton, A. (1999). Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1609-1624.
Gibson, B. S. (1996a). Visual quality and attentional capture: a challenge to the special role of abrupt onset. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1496-1504.
Gibson, B. S. (1996b). The masking account of attentional capture: a reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1514-1520.
Gibson, B. S., & Amelio, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 496-504.
Gibson, B. S., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search. Psychological Science, 9, 176-182.
Gibson, B. S., & Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 699-706.
Gold, J. M., & Pratt, J. (2001). Is position “special” in visual attention? Evidence that top-down processes guide visual selection. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 261-270.
Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E. (1996). What’s in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1260-1277.
Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). The role of physical and conceptual properties in preserving object continuity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 26, 136-150.
Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998). The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature, 391, 481-484.
Grossberg, S. (2001). Linking the laminar circuits of visual cortex to visual perception: development, grouping, and attention. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 513-526.
Henderson, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
Henderson, J. M., & Anes, M. D. (1994). Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 826-839.
Hikosaka O., Myauchi S., & Shimojo, S. (1993a). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33, 1219-1240.
Hikosaka O., Myauchi S., & Shimojo, S. (1993b). Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detected as motion sensation. Perception, 22, 517-526.
Hillstrom, A. P., & Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Percepttion & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411.
Horstmann, G. (2002). Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search. Psychological Science, 13, 499-505.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Neuropsychological analogies of inattentional blindness. Psyche, 6, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-16-humphreys.html
Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Jolicceur, P. (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 640-660.
Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M, Kramer, A. F. & Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons. Vision Research, 40, 1443-1458.
Itti, L, & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489 - 1506.
James, W. (1890). Principle of Psychology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1983.
Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 717-730.
Johnson, J. D., Hutchison, A., & Neill, W. T. (2001). Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 841-847.
Johnston, J. C., & Pashler, H. (1990). Close Binding of Identity and Location in Visual Feature Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 843-856.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. B. Laong & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
Joseph, J. S., Chun, M.M., & Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task. Nature, 387, 805-807.
Joseph, J. S., & Optican, L. M. (1996). Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 651-665.
Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman and D. A. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. & Burkell. J. (1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 510-522.
Kahneman, D., Tresiman, A., & Gibb, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
Kawahara, J., Yokosawa, K., Nishida, S., & Sato, T. (1996). Illusory line motion in visual search：attentional facilitation or apparent motion? Perception, 25, 901-920.
Kim, M., & Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1009-1023.
Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural cirvuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
Kramer, A. F., Cassavaugh, N. D., Irwin, D. E., Peterson, M. S., & Hahn, S. (2000Kusunoki, M., Gottlieb, J., & Goldberg, M. E. (2000). The lateral intraparietal area as a salience map: the representation of abrupt onset, stimulus motion, and task relevance. Vision Research, 40, 1459-1468.
Kwak, H.-W., & Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocation to locations and to other attributes. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 455-464.
Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (1999). A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 93-98.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
Li, J. L. & Yeh, S. L. (2001). The uniqueness of abrupt onset in capturing attention: evidence from inattentional blindness. Perception (suppl.), 30, 48.
Li, J. L., & Yeh, S. L. (2002). Attentional capture without display-wide attentional setting: evidence from inattentional blindness, Perception (suppl.), 31, 79a.
Li, J. L., & Yeh, S. L. (2003). Do Chinese and Americans see opposite apparent motion? Replicated and revised. Visual Cognition, 10, 537-547.
Li, J. L., Hu, C. M., & Yeh, S. L. (2002). The cue validity and compatibility effects of the irrelevant onset distractor, Perception (suppl.), 31, 78c.
Logan, G. D. (1975). On the relation between identifying and locating masked targets in visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27A, 451-457.
Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
Luck, S. J., & Thomas, S. J. (1999). What variety of attention is automatically captured by peripheral cues? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1424-1435.
Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Hyun, J. (2003). Toward an embeffed process methotheory of selective attention. Third Annual Meeting of Vision SceienceS Society, p. 18, TA40.
Mack, A. & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mack, A. (2000). Inattentional Blindness: Reply to Commentaries. Psyche, 7, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v7/psyche-7-16-mack.html.
Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475-501.
Martin-Emerson, R., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 739-751.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567-571.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352.
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., & Chabris, C. F. (2000). Sustained inattentional blindness: the role of location in the detection of unexpected dynamic events. Psyche, 6, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/payche-6-14-most.html.
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12, 9-17.
Motter, B. C. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 909-919.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance of interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631-1647.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the perception of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Newby, E. A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention. Perception, 27, 1025-1040.
Newby, E. A., & Rock, I. (2001). Location and attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 155-168.
Nissen, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: is location special? In M. I. Posner & O. S. Martin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 205-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.
Noë, A., & ƠRegan, K. (2000). Perception, attention and the grand illusion. Psyche, 6, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/payche-6-15-noe.html
Noles, N., Scholl, B., & Mitroff, S. (2003). The persistence of object file representations. Third Annual Meeting of Vision SceienceS Society, p. 96, FR120.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (2000). Salience from feature contrast: temporal properties of saliency mechanisms. Vision Research, 40, 2421-2435.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (2002). Attention shift to salient targets. Vision Research, 42, 1287-1306.
Olivers, C. N. L., Humphreys, G. W., Heinke, D., & Copper, A. C. G. (2002). Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 540-560.
Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Hahn, S. (2002). Modulation of oculomotor capture by abrupt onsets during attentionally demanding visual search. Visual Cognition, 9, 755-791.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Component of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., & Rafal, R. D. (1982). Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London), 298, 187-198.
Pratt, J., & Fischer, M.H. (2002).Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 294-301.
Pratt, J., Sekuler, A. B., & McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and in inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 8, 33-46.
Rees, G., Russell, C., Firth, C. D., & Driver, J. (1999). Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science, 286, 2504-2507.
Remington, R. W., & Folk, C. L. (2001). A dissocation between attention and selection. Psychological Science, 12, 511-515.
Remington, R. W., Folk, C. L., & McLean, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 298-307.
Rensink, R. A. (1997). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
Rensink, R. A. (2000). When good observers go bad: change blindness, inattentional blindness, and visual experience. Psyche, 6, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/payche-6-9-rensink.html.
Rock, I., Linnett, C. M., Grant, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502-534.
Sheeley-Tremblay, J., & Mack, A. (1999). Matacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science, 10, 508-515.
Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 147-155.
Steinman, B. A., Steinman, S. B., & Lehhmkuhle, S. (1997). Transient visual attention is dominated by the magnocellular stream. Vision Research, 37, 17-23.
Steinman, B. A., Steinman, S. B., & Lehmkuhle, S. (1995). Visual attention mechanisms show a center-surround organization. Vision Research, 35, 1859-1869.
Steinman, S. B., & Steinman, B. A. (1997). The line motion illusion: visual attention or apparent motion? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, S372.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vision Research, 34, 179-189.
Tepin, M. B., & Dark, V. J. (1992). Do abrupt-onset peripheral cues attract attention automatically? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 111-132.
Theeuwes J. (1993). Visual selective attention: a theoretical analysis. Acta Psychologica, 83, 93-154.
Theeuwes, J. (1991a). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
Theeuwes, J. (1991b). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effects of visual onset and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
Theeuwes, J. (1994a). Exogenous and endogenous control of visual selection. Perception, 23, 429-440.
Theeuwes, J. (1994b). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selection search for color and visual abrupt onset. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 799-806.
Theeuwes, J. (1995). Temporal and spatial characteristics of preattentive and attentive processing. Visual Cognition, 2, 221-233.
Theeuwes, J. (1996). Abrupt luminance changes pops out; abrupt color change does not. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 637-344.
Theeuwes, J., & Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1342-1353.
Theeuwes, J., & Godjin, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: evience from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 764-770.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. K. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In J.,Theeuwes, P., Atchley, & A. K., Kramer (Eds). Top-down and Bottom-up Control of Attention. (pp 105-124). Cambridge.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. K., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. K., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1595-1608.
Todd, J. T., & Van Gleder, P. (1979). Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for measurement of human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 625-638.
Todd, S., & Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 198-210.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteen Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
Treisman, A. (1992). Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. American Psychologist, 47, 862-875.
Treisman, A. M., Kanwisher, N. G., (1998). Perceiving visually presented objects: recognition, awareness, and modularity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 218-226.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 131-139.
Tse, P., Cavanagh, P., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The role of parsing in high-level motion processing. In T. Watanabe, High-level Motion Processing-Computational, Neurobiological and Psychophysical Perspectives, Cambridge, MA： MIT Press.
Turatto, M. and Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639-1643.
Turatto, M. and Galfano, G. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 286-297.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). ''What'' and ''where'' in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157-165.
van der Heijden, A. H., Kurvink, A. G., de Lange, L., de Leeuw, F., & van der Geest, J. N. (1996). Attending to color with proper fixation. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1224-1237.
Vidyasagar, T. R. (1999). A neuronal model of attentional spotlight: parietal guiding the temporal. Brain Research Review, 30, 66-76.
von Grunau, M., Dube, S., & Kwas, M. (1996). Two contributions to motion induction: a pre-attentive effect and facilitation due to attentional capture. Vision Research, 36, 2447-2457.
Warner, C. B., Juola, J. F., & Koshino, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 243-251.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 379-395.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Extending guided search: Why guided search needs a preattentive "item map". In A.F. Kramer, M.G.H. Coles, & G.D. Logan (Eds), Converging operations in the study of visual attention. (pp. 247-270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual Search. In: Pashler H., editor. Attention. London UK: University College London Press.
Wolfe, J. M. (2000). Inattentional Amnesia. In: V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting Memories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K.R., & Franzel, S.L. (1989). Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676-681.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attention capture in vision. In Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (Eds.). Converging Ooperations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 45-77), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In Pashler, H. (Eds.), Attention (Chapter 6, pp. 223-256), UK: Psychology Press.
Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661-676.
Yantis, S., & Gibson, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 48, 182-204.
Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20, 95-107.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 46, 124-134.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22, 1505-1513.
Yeh, S. L., Liao, H. I., & Li, J. L. (2002). On defining the condition of stimulus-driven attentional capture, Perception (suppl.), 31, 97c.
Ziebell, O., & Nothdurft, H.-C. (1999). Cuing and Pop-out. Vision Research, 39, 2113-2125.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：732（臺灣：729，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67483880
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上