:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響市地重劃辦理完成之相關因素研究
作者:李吉弘
作者(外文):Ji-HorngLee
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:都市計劃學系碩博士班
指導教授:林享博
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2010
主題關鍵詞:市地重劃抵費地財務模型Urban Land ReadjustmentCost Equivalent LandFinancial Model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
市地重劃涉及多項不同之工作內容,諸如行政作業、整地及道路工程、地上物拆遷補償等等,這些作業均涉及不同年度所需經費之支出,而成市地重劃之成本面;而市地重劃之收益面主要來自於抵費地之標讓售所得,此項所得發生在整個作業過程的最後階段。本研究依據市地重劃現行法令規定及實務操作情形,以數理經濟概念推導財務模型獲致:費用平均負擔比率、重劃總平均負擔比率、無償提供開發土地比率等越大時,總利潤越大,平均成本越小;但公共設施用地平均負擔比率、讓售抵費地面積比例、重劃後無償取得公共設施比率、行政作業費、公共設施每公頃工程費、地上物補償費等越大時,總利潤越小,平均成本越大。
在實證方面,本研究蒐集全國已完成案例中之都市計劃附帶條件須以市地重劃開發區為實證對象,以多元迴歸模型進行分析,實證結果顯示,影響市地重劃開發利潤的主要因素依序為抵費地面積、重劃支出金額、讓售抵費地面積和重劃後平均地價。其次,在重劃成功開發與否之發生比率方面,本研究採二項邏吉特模型進行分析,依其影響程度獲致:重劃總面積大於2公頃、重劃前後地價差異比?愈大、公共設施用地平均負擔比率愈高、重劃總面積愈大、地區人口數愈多等越傾向開發;但總平均負擔比率愈高、重劃區土地所有權人數愈多,越傾向於不開發。
The cost of a urban land readjustment (ULR) project involves a variety of expenditure like administration, public facilities construction, compensation for removing private properties and else. And the sale of “Cost Equivalent Land” brings ULR the revenue. This study uses the concept of fundamental methods of Mathematical Economics to spread out the financial model of a ULR project and finds that: the more the average burden ratio of LR expenditure, the total average burden ratio of LR, the ratio of free taking land are, the more(less) the profit(average cost) can get; the more the average burden ratio of the land of public facilities, the ratio of the Cost Equivalent Land sold to specific persons, the ratio of public facilities, administration expenditure, the average cost of public facilities construction, the compensation of removing private properties are, the less(more) the profit(average cost) can get.
For empirical analysis, this study collects some ULR projects which are already completed to establish a multiple regression model to discuss the effect of financial factors on the profit of ULR projects. This study finds that there are four main factors: the size of Cost Equivalent Land、the total expenditure、the area of Cost Equivalent Land sold in a specific price、the average land price after readjustment, according to the importance in order. As for the analysis of Odds ratio, this study establishes a Logistic model and finds that: the more the total area of a ULR project than 2 hectors、the ratio of the land price after and before readjustment、the average burden rate of the land of public facilities、the total area of a ULR project、the population of the district are , the more possibly a ULR project could be completed. But the more the total average burden ratio of ULR、the population inside the ULR area are, the less possibly a ULR project could be developed.
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1.內政部,2002,「都市計劃整體開發地區處理方案」。
2.內政部,2003,「市地重劃作業手冊」。
3.內政部,2005,「經界線與同心圓-台灣市地重劃案例實錄」。
4.王濟川,郭志剛,2004,「Logistic 迴歸模型-方法與運用」,五南圖 書出版公司。
5.何東波,1996,「高雄市都市成長管理」,研考雙月刊第20卷第5期。
6.辛晚教,1991,「都市及區域計劃」,中國地政研究所。
7.金家禾,1984,「新市區土地開發方式之評選研究-以關渡平原之開發為例」,國立中興大學法商學院都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
8.吳容明,1990,「市地重劃效益分析及其評估模式之研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。new window
9.林中森,「市地重劃對土地利用影響之研究-高雄市之實證分析」,國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。new window
10.林英彥,1997,「市地重劃」,文笙書局。
11.林享博,2002,「空間經濟學」講義(未出版),國立成功大學都巿計畫學系。
12.林享博,胡振揚,2002,「財務平衡與區段徵收」,中華民國住宅學會第11屆年會暨住宅學術論文研討會。
13.林祖嘉,1990,台灣地區房租與房價關係之研究,國立政治大學經濟研究所。new window
14.周太郎,1990,「市地開發方式之評選研究─以淡海特定區為例」,國立中興大學法商學院都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
15.周良惠,1985,「市地重劃土地分配對促進市地利用之評估研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
16.孫寶鉅,2003,「政府土地開發機制改進策略之研究-台北港特定區之分析」,國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
17.徐 豪,1996,「市地重劃發展過程及其效益形成之研究-臺南市之實證分析」,國立成功大學都巿計畫學系碩士論文。
18.陳明竺,2005,「都市設計」,創興出版社有限公司。
19.張金鶚,2001,「房地產投資與決策分析理論與實務」,華泰書局。
20.黃名義、張金鶚,2001,「辦公室、住宅與住辦混合租金之比較分析—面積、區位與產品異質性之影響」,都市與計劃,28:3。new window
21.楊雅婷,2008,「結合土地細分進行市地重劃之研究-以九份子重劃區為例」,國立成功大學都巿計畫學系碩士論文。
22.賴宗裕,1986,「台北市市地重劃效益之研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
23.蔡小美,2007,「實質選擇權在市地重劃上應用之研究---以公辦第54期高雄巨蛋為例」,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
24.錢學陶,1990,「都市計劃學導論」,茂榮圖書公司。
25.蕭錚主編,1985,「地政大辭典」,中國地政研究所。
26.謝靜琪,1995,「市地重劃效益與負擔之研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。new window
27.謝靜琪,2003,「市地重劃之學理初探」,台灣土地金融季刊,第40卷第3期,民國92年9月。
28.邊泰明,2003,「土地使用規劃與財產權-理論與實務」,詹氏書局。
二、外文部分
1.Agresti A. (1996) , An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2.Balchin P.N., Bull G.H. and Kieve J.L.(1995), Urban Land Economics and Public Policy, Macmillan Press LTD.
3.Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R. E.(1980), Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley.
4.Brueckner, J.K.(1990), Growth Controls and Land Values, Land Economics, 66:3, pp.237-48.
5.Capozza D., Helsley R.(1989),The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth, Journal of Urban Economics, 26. pp295-306.
6.Capozza D., Li Y.(2002), Optimal land development decisions, Journal of Urban Economics, 51, pp123-142.
7.Cheng K.F. , Hsueh H.M.,(1999), Correcting bias due to misclassification in the estimation of logistic regression models, Statistics & Probability Letters, 44, pp229-240.
8.Chiang A.C.(1984), Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics, McGraw Hill Inc.
9.Colwell P.F., Munneke H.J.(1999), Land Prices and Land Assembly in the CBD, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 18:2, pp163-174.
10.Colwell P.F., Sirmans C.F.(1978), Area, Time, Certrality and the Value of Urban Land, Land Economics, 54:4, pp514-519.
11.Demaris, A.(2005), Regression with Social Data: Modeling Continuous and Limited Response Variables, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
12.Fischel W.A.(1985), The Economics of Zoning Laws-A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.Gaynor G.H.(1996), Monitoring projects—It’s more than reading reports, Research -Technology Management, 39:2, pp45-47.
14.Green H. G.(1988), Qualitative Research in Real Estate Development, The Journal of Real Estate Development, 3:4, pp12-17.
15.Greene, W.(2003), Econometric Analysis, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
16.Guntermann K.L.(1997), Residential Land Prices Prior to Development, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 14:1/2, pp1-17.
17.Guttery R. S.(2002), The Effects of Subdivision Design on Housing Values: The Case of Alleyways, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 23:3.pp.265-273.
18.Harvey J.(2000), Urban land economics, Basingstoke, Hampshire:Macmillan.
19.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. (1989) Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
20.Juergensmeyer J. C. and Roberts T. E.(2003), Land use planning and development regulation law, Thomson West press.
21.Larsson G.(1993), Land readjustment: a modern approach to urbanization, Published by Avebury, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
22.Larsson G.(1997), Land readjustment: a tool for urban development, Habitat International, 21:2, pp141-152.
23.Lay P.(1985), Beware of the Cost/Benefit Model for IS Project Evaluation, Journal of Systems Management, June, pp.30-35.
24.Lin T., Evans A.(2000), The relationship between the price of land and size of plot when plots are small, Land Economics, 76:3, pp386-394.
25.Lin, T.(2005), Land assembly in a fragmented land market through land readjustment, Land Use Policy, 22, pp95-102.
26.Long, S.(1997), Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
27.Maddala, G. S.(1983), Limted Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28.Mandelker D.R., Cunningham R.A.(1985),Planning and Control of Land Development:Cases and Materials , Charlottesville, Virginia, Law Publishers.
29.Mayer C.J., Somerville C.T.(2000), Land Use Regulation and New Construction, Regional Science & Urban Economics, 30, pp639-662.
30.Mayer C.J., Somerville C.T.(2000), Residential Construction: Using the Urban Growth Model to Estimate Housing Supply, Journal of Urban Economics, 48, pp85-109.
31.Miles M.E., Haney Jr. R.L., Berens G.(1996), Real Estate Development: Principles and Process, Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C.
32.Nagelkerke, N J. D. (1991), A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination. Biometrika, 78, 691-692.
33.Palma A., Kilani K.(2005), Switching in the Logit, Economics Letters, 88, pp196-202.
34.Pindyck R.S., Rubinfeld D.L.(1991), Economics Forecasts and Econometric Models, McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd.
35.Remer D. S. and Armando P. N. (1995a), A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 1:Net present value and rate of return methods, International Journal of Production Economics, 42:79-96.
36.Remer D. S. and Armando P. N. (1995b), A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 2: Ratio, payback and accounting methods, International Journal of Production Economics, 42:101-129.
37.Sharpe W.(1985), Investment(3rd ed.), Prentice Hall.
38.Smersh G.T., Smith M.T., Schwartz Jr. A.L(2003), Factors affecting residential property development patterns, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 25:1, pp61-75.
39.Somerville C.T.(2001), Permits, Starts, and Completions: structural relationships versus real options, Real Estate Economics, 29:1, pp161-190.
40.Sorensen A.(2000), Conflict, consensus or consent: implications of Japanese land readjustment practice for developing countries, Habitat International, 24:1, pp51-73.
41.Sorensen A.(2000), Land readjustment and metropolitan growth: an examination of suburban land development and urban sprawl in the Tokyo metropolitan, Progress in Planning, 53, pp217-330.
42.Thibodeau, T. G.(1989), Housing Price Indexes from the 1974-1983 SIMSA Annual Housing Surveys, AREUEA Journal, Vol. 1, No.1.
43.Turk S.S.(2005), Land readjustment: an examination of its application in turkey, Cities, 22:1, pp29-42.
44.Watkins A.R.(1999), Impacts of Land Development Charges, Land Economics, 75: 3, pp415-424.
45.Wu J., Cho S.(2007), The effect of local land use regulations on urban development in the Western United States, Regional Science & Urban Economics, 37, pp69-86.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE