:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:產品驅動的技術升級與品牌發展:策略模擬分析
作者:杜英儀
作者(外文):Tu, Ying-yi
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:科技管理研究所
指導教授:袁建中
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:品牌發展OEM-ODM-OPM-OBM模型新產品開發情境模擬標準模組系統整合性產品系統Branding DevelopmentOEM-ODM-OPM-OBM ModelOriginal Product Manufacture (OPM)SimulationStandard Modular Systems (SMS)Integrated Production Systems (IPS)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
OEM-ODM-OBM為大家所熟知的開發中國家產業發展的演進模式,或代工廠商轉型至品牌發展的演進路徑,但實際觀察後進國家的發展顯示,代工廠商較容易從OEM升級至ODM,但卻很困難轉型至OBM階段。文獻指出OBM與ODM為不同的發展路徑,企業所需的資源與能耐不同,以及品牌商的反制策略,是造成轉換障礙的兩大原因。本文則認為忽略新產品開發階段(OPM)的策略模式選擇,也是代工廠商難以成功發展品牌的重要原因,並提出增加「新產品開發階段」—OPM (Original Product Manufacture),將原本三階段模式修正為「OEM-ODM-OPM-OBM」的四階段演進模式,較能釐清代工企業的演進路徑。
在OPM策略方面,本文區分為標準模組系統(SMS)、整合性產品系統(IPS)兩種新產品開發策略,並根據理論與文獻,建構一組包含一家品牌商以及兩家技術水準不同的代工廠商,在技術市場、代工市場與產品市場上的策略交互影響模型。透過情境模擬與數值分析,探討不同的OPM策略情境下,追求短期/長期利益之最佳策略選擇,並與實際個案的策略演進進行比較,呈現實際演進路徑與最佳路徑的差異。
研究結果發現,代工廠商發展品牌的最佳路徑是採取IPS的新產品開發策略並以長期利益進行決策,亦即依循OEM-ODM-OPM(IPS)-OBM路徑,但往往因為企業資源有限、難以通過轉型U谷考驗、產品差異化能力不足、側重短期利益決策模式,或習慣於SMS模式,以致引導代工廠商選擇次佳策略路徑,亦即在OPM階段會經歷三階段的策略轉換:從短期策略選擇轉換致SMS情境下的長期策略,再轉換至IPS情境下的最佳策略,依循OEM-ODM-OPM(短期-長期SMS-IPS)-OBM的演進路徑,逐漸調整至長期最佳策略下的產品定位與資源配置,這是開發中國家特有的產品驅動之技術升級與品牌發展過程。
This paper addresses an important but normally ignored capability development, the stage of original product manufacturing (OPM) in the stage of upgrading technology from ODM to OBM. We propose a four-stage "OEM-ODM-OPM-OBM" evolution model of technology upgrading and brand development. It explains the development strategies and patterns by technological firms in developing economies for developing their brands. The reason why many firms may fail in branding or err in long term strategy before they arrive at the OBM stage is because they ignore the selection of strategic patterns in the developmental phase of a new product. This acts as a barrier between ODM and OBM in the previously identified three-stage model of “OEM-ODM-OBM”. This study constructs a model consisting of one brand-owning firm and two contract manufacturers with different technological levels in order to illuminate interactive effects at the technology market, contract manufacturing market, and product market levels. Scenario-based simulation and numerical analysis are employed in combination with this model to explore contract manufacturers' long-term optimal brand development strategies in lieu of brand-owning firms' countermeasures. We find contract manufacturers would adopt their optimal brand development strategies to move toward long-term brand development strategies through changing strategies in three turning points.
一、中文部分
1. 王郁倫,「宏碁毛利率奔2年新高」,蘋果日報,民國104年5月9日。
2. 尹慧中,「宏碁槓聯想 拚雙位數市占」,經濟日報,民國104年5月11日。
3. 江雪嬌,「國鼓勵中小企業技術技術創新策略之研究」,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,第7卷第2期,頁169-184,民國90年。
4. 艾迪楊,「2010全球第四大車廠--現代汽車韓國總部參訪」,車訊新聞,民國100年6月23日。
5. 宏碁股份有限公司,宏碁2013年年報,民國103年。
6. 品牌臺灣發展計畫第二期,「巨大機械:布局專利 提高品牌含金量」,品牌臺灣 綻放全球-2013輔導成果案例分享,民國103年。
7. 哈佛商業評論,「蔡明介的關鍵轉念:從想競爭到懂顧客」,2013年1月號,擷取自http://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0002231_2.html。
8. 施振榮,再造宏碁:開創、成長與挑戰,天下文化,臺北,民國81年。
9. 施振榮,全球品牌大戰略-品牌先生施振榮觀點,天下文化,臺北,民國94年。
10. 施振榮,宏碁的世紀變革,天下文化,臺北,民國93年。
11. 孫婕,「蔡明介:以破壞式創新 締造IC設計產業榮景」,工業技術與資訊月刊,249期,民國101年7月號。
12. 商業週刊新聞稿,「專訪聯發科董事長蔡明介:注意力放在機會而不是問題!」,民國98年5月7日,擷取自http://bw.businessweekly.com.tw/press/content.php?id=8971。
13. 劉仁傑、魏聰哲,「日本型經營結構的集中策略─ Panasonic的筆記型電腦事業案例解析」, 産業與管理論壇,第10卷第4期,頁24-41,民國97年。new window
14. 範棣、曹建偉,長大,智富,臺灣,民國93年。
15. 鄭寶堂,「全球布局、品牌與在地化),臺商大陸投資:名人訪談錄,印刻社,臺北,民國98年。
16. 瞿宛文,「臺灣後起者能藉自創品牌升級嗎?」,臺灣社會研究季刊,第63期,頁1-52,民國95年。new window
17. 魏錫鈴,騎上鋒頂:捷安特與劉金標傳奇,聯經,臺北,民國93年。
二、英文部分
1. Aaker, D A. , Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, Free Press, New York, 1991.
2. Akamatsu, K., “Trade of woolen products in Japan”, Studies of Commerce and Economy, 13(1), pp.129-212, 1935.
3. Akamatsu, K., “A theory of unbalanced growth in the world economy”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 86, pp.196-217, 1961.
4. Amsden, A. H. &; Chu, W. W., Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgradin, The MIT Press Policies, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003.
5. Arru#westeur050#ada, B. &; V#westeur034#zquez, X. H., “When your contract manufacturer becomes your competitor”, Harvard Business Review, 84(9), pp.135-143, 2006.
6. Baldwin, C. Y. &; Clark, K. B, “Manageing in an age of modularity”, Harvard Business Review, 75(5), pp.84-93, 1997.
7. Chen, S. H., Wen, P., Liu, M. C. &; Lin, X. W., “Innovation capability-building and technology branding: From OEM/ODM to OBM”, International Conference on Industrial Technology Innovation Repositioning for Industrial Growth and Economic Prosperity through Innovation, Taipei, August, 2006.
8. Cheng, A. L. P. &; Tu, Y. Y., “Branding beyond OEM: Optimal strategies for technological upgrading and transformation”, Conference on Science and Technology Management for Costal Area Industrial Development, Guangzhou, 2009.
9. Christensen, C.M., “Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Part I: component technologies”, Production and Operations Management, 1(4), pp.334-351, 1992.
10. Christensen, C.M., “Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Part II: architectural technologies”, Production and Operations Management, 1(4), pp.358-366, 1992.
11. Christensen, C.M., The iInnovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Havard Business School Press, Bosten, 1997.
12. Christensen, C. M., &; Raynor, M. E., The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and sustaining Successful Growth, Harvard Business School Press, Bosten, 2003.
13. Farquhar, P. H., “Managing brand equity”, Marketing Research, 1, pp.24-33, 1989.
14. Guillen, M., The Limits of Convergence: Globalization and Organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spin, Princeton University Press, 2001.
15. Hobday, M., Innovation in East Asia: the Challenge to Japan, Edward Elgar, London, 1995.
16. Hobday, M., “Latecomer catch-up strategies in electronics: Samsung of Korea and ACER of Taiwan”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 4(2), pp.48-83, 1998.
17. Hobday, M., “East versus southeast asia innovation systems:Comparing OEM- and TNC-led growth in electronics”, Technology, Learning, and Innovation-Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, L. Kim and R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 129-169, 2000.
18. Keller, K. L., “Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), pp.1-29, 1993.
19. Lall, S., Developing Countries as Exporters of Technology: The Indian Experience. The Macmillan Press Ltd, London, 1982.
20. Lee, K., “Making a technology catch-up: Battiers and opportunities”, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2), pp.97-131, 2005.
21. Lee, K. &; Lim, C., “Technological regimes, catching-up and leapforgging: the findings from the Korean industries”, Research Policy, 30(3), pp.459-483, 2001.
22. Lieberman, M. B. &; Montgomery, D. B., “First-mover advantages”, Strategic Management Journal, 9(summer), pp.41-58, 1988.
23. Mesterton-Gibbons, M., “A technique for finding optimal two-species harvesting policies”, Ecological Modelling. 92(2-3), pp.235-244, 1996.
24. Nabi, I. &; Luthria, M., Building Competitive Firms: Incentives and Capabilities, World Bank Publications, 2002.
25. Utterback, J. M. &; Abernathy, W. J., “A dynamic model of process and product innovation”. Omega, 3(6), pp.639–656, 1975.
26. Vernon, R., “International investment and international trade in the product cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics , 80, pp.90-207, 1966.
27. Westphal, L. E., Kim, L. &; Dahlman, C. J., “Reflections on the Republic of Korea’s acquisition of technological capability”, International Technology Transfer, N. Rosenberg, &; C. Frischtak (Eds.), 1985.
28. Wong, P. K., “National innovation systems for rapid technology catch-up: an analytical Fframework and comparative analysis of Korea, Taiwan and Singapore”. The DRUID Summer Conference on National Innovation Systems. Industrial Dynamics and Innovation Policy, Rebild, Denmark, 1999.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE