|
References Aguilar, L., Walton, G., & Wieman, C. (2014). Psychological insights for improved physics teaching. Physics Today, 67, 43-49. Aronson, J. & Steele, C.M. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of human competence, motivation, and self-concept. In C. Dweck & E. Elliot (Eds.), Handbook of Competence & Motivation. New York, Guilford. Aronson, J., Lustina, M., Good, C., Keough, K., Brown, J. L., & Steele, C. M. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 11–23. Doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1371 Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math, and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 427-448. Doi: 10.1007/s11218-0120-9185-3 Ceci, S., Ginther, D., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. (2015). Women in science: The path to progress. Scientific American Mind, 26(1), 62-69. Chatard, A., Selimbegovic, L., Kona, P., & Mugny, G. (2008). Performance boosts in the classroom: Stereotype endorsement and prejudice moderate stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1421-1424. Doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2008.05.004 Cheng, Y. Y., & Chung, S. H. (2007). Influence of gender stereotype threat on female students’ learning in science classes. National Science Council (NSC-96-2522- S-110-001). Cheng, Y. Y., & Chung, S. H. (2008). A longitudinal examination of gender stereotype threat effect mechanisms on female students’ learning in science classes. National Science Council (NSC-97-2511-S-110-004-MY2). Cheryan, S. (2012). Understanding the paradox in math-related fields : why some gender gap remain while others do not? Sex roles, 66, 184-190. Doi: 10.1007/ s11199-011- 0060-z Flore P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 25-44. Doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002 Garcia, J., Cohen, G. L. (2012). A social psychological approach to educational intervention. In Shafir, E. (Ed.), Behavioral Foundations of Policy (pp. 329-350). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Johnson, H. J., Barnard-Brak, L., Saxon, T. F., & Johnson, M. K. (2012). An experimental study of the effects of stereotype threat and stereotype lift on men and women’s performance in mathematics. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 137-149. Keller, J. (2007). Stereotype threat in classroom settings: The interactive effect of domain identification, task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students’ math performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 323-338. Doi: 10. 1348/000709906X113662 Kurtz-Costes, B., Copping, K. E., Rowley, S. J., & Kinlaw, C. R. (2014). Gender and age differences in awareness and endorsement of gender stereotypes about academic abilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 603-618. Doi: 10.1007/s10212-014-0216-7 Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver-Linn, E. (2012). Implicit science stereotypes mediate the relationship between gender and academic participation. Sex roles, 66, 220-234. Doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z Lavonen, J., Gedrovics, J., Byman, R., Meisalo, V., Juuti, K., Uitto, A. (2008). Students’ motivational orientations and career choice in science and technology: A comparative investigation in Finland and Latvia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 86-102. Leslie, S.-J., Cimpan, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262-265. Doi: 10.1126/science.1261375 MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate behavioral research, 30(1), 41-62. Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G.M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international- results-science.html Ministry of Education, Department of Statistics. (2016a). Number of college graduates. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=MgAwADgA0 Ministry of Education, Department of Statistics. (2016b). Number of college professors. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=MgAxADQA0 Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330(6008), 1234-1237. doi: 10.1126/science. 1195996 Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879-885. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2015). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015. Special Report NSF 15-311. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/ Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314-1334. Doi: 10.1037/a0012702 Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Linner, N. M., Devos, T. D., Ayala, A…, Greenwald, A. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Science, 106(26), 10593-10597. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809921106 O’Brien, L. T., & Crandall, C. S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 782–789. Doi: 10.1177/0146167203029006010 OECD (2007a). PISA 2006: Science competences for tomorrow’s world. (Volume 1: Analysis). PISA, OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/ download/9807011e.pdf?expires=1463273726&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=01BB3E102D1EB54A32123411508FD4FC OECD. (2007b). PISA 2006: Volume II: Data. PISA, OECD. Retrieved from http://www.nbbmuseum.be/doc/seminar2010/nl/bibliografie/opleiding/data.pdf OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. PISA, OECD. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264229 945-en Owens, J., Massey, D. S., (2011) Stereotype threat and college academic performance: A latent variables approach. Social Science Research, 40, 150-166. Doi:10.1016/j.ssre search.2010.09.010 Picho, K., Rodriguez, A. & Finnie, L. (2013). Exploring the moderating role of context on the mathematics performance of females under stereotype threat: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(3), 299-333. Doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.73 7380 Rosenthal, H. E. S., & Crisp, R. J. (2007). Choking under pressure: When an additional positive stereotype affects performance for domain identified male mathematics students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 317-326. Doi: 10.1007 /BF03173429 Rydell, R. J., Shiffrin, R. M., Boucher, K. L., Van Loo, K., & Rydell, M. T. (2010). Stereotype threat prevents perceptual learning. PNAS, 107(32), 14042-14047. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 50, 835-850. Doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.00000 29101.74557.a0 Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of mediational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 177-206. Doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034020.20317.89 Smith, J. L., & Johnson, C. (2006). A stereotype boost or choking under pressure? Positive gender stereotype and men who are low in domain identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 51-63. Doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp 2801_5 Smith, J. L., & White, P. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It’s not just a woman’s issue. Sex Roles, 47, 179–191. Doi: 10.1023/A:1021051223441 Smith, J. L., Sansone, C., & White, P. H. (2007). The stereotyped task engagement process: The role of interest and achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 99-114. Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415-437. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235 Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women''s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4-28. Steele, C. M. & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotype shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629. Steele, C. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us. New York: Norton. Steele, J., James, J.B., & Barnett, R.C. (2002). Learning in a man''s world: examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46-50. Doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00042 Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational psychology review, 29(1), 119-140. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype Lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456-467. Doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2 Walton, G. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test Scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1132-1139. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280. 2009.02417.x 洪秀珍、謝臥龍、駱慧文 (2015)。科技大學女學生「數學領域認同」、「數學性別刻板」、「性別角色刻板」、「情境訊息」與「數學焦慮」之研究。科學與人文研究,3(3),30-54。
|