:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民眾對警察執法正當性感知及其影響因素之研究
作者:劉璟薇
作者(外文):LIU, CHING-WEI
校院名稱:中央警察大學
系所名稱:犯罪防治研究所
指導教授:賴擁連
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2023
主題關鍵詞:程序正義分配正義警察執法正當性服從合作感知procedural justicedistributive justicelegitimacyobediencecooperationperception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
受到人權普世價值的影響,民眾對於警察執法正當性的議題,在當代警政發展,益發受到重視。然而,相較於國外對此一議題的研究,臺灣仍屬萌芽階段,實有從事實證研究的必要性。根據國外文獻,本研究嘗試結合程序正義與分配正義等理論,作為解釋民眾對於警察執法正當性之研究框架,據以探究其是否會影響民眾對我國警察執法正當性的態度與程度。
本研究採取問卷調查法,針對桃園市的居民,以分層隨機的方式,進行抽樣。施測期間為2022年3月至4月,成功回收有效問卷1,147份,回收率達90%。並運用適切的統計工具,進行多變量及結構方程式模型分析。
研究發現如下:男性、年長者、有過與警察接觸經驗的受訪者,較願意服從警察指令並與之合作;程序正義或分配正義確實可以有效地預測民眾對警察執法正當性的感知,但若同時考量程序正義與分配正義時,程序正義對警察執法正當性的感知,並不具顯著的預測力;再者,分配正義與程序正義彼此之間呈現高度的正相關,換言之,程序正義與分配正義同等地影響了民眾對於警察執法正當性的感知。最後,根據本研究發現,提出相關政策建議,提供有關當局參考。
Under the influence of human rights as the universal value, public perceptions on police legitimacy have garnered increasing attention in the contemporary development of policing research. However, research on this topic in Taiwan is still in its infancy compared with the counterpart in other countries. Conducting empirical research on this topic in Taiwan is necessary. According to studies from other countries, the present study combined procedural justice and distributive justice theories to construct a research framework for explaining public perceptions on police legitimacy, to explore whether such perceptions affect the people’s attitude toward the police legitimacy in Taiwan, and to identify the level of influence.
This study adopted a questionnaire survey method. People living in Taoyuan City were sampled through stratified random sampling. The questionnaire was distributed in March to April, 2022. A total of 1147 valid responses were collected, reaching a response rate of 90%. Appropriate statistical tools were employed to perform multivariate and structural equation modeling analyses.
The research results revealed that male, older adults, and respondents with experience of contact with the police had higher willingness to obey orders by the police and cooperate with them. Procedural or distributive justice could effectively predict the public perceptions of police legitimacy. However, when procedural justice and distributive justice are considered concurrently, procedural justice did not generate significant predictive power over public perceptions of police legitimacy. Moreover, distributive justice and procedural justice exhibited highly positive correlation. In other words, procedural justice and distributive justice equally affected the public perceptions of police legitimacy. According to the findings, this study proposed relevant policy-related suggestions as references for the relevant competent authority.
壹、 中文部分
一、 專書
王正華,陳寬裕(2017)。論文統計分析實務:SPSS與AMOS的運用(三版)。五南出版社。
邱皓政(2014)。量化研究與統計分析 - SPSS(PASW) 資料分析範例解析。五南出版社。
吳明隆、張毓仁(2010)。結構方程模式-實務應用秘笈。五南出版社。
孫關宏(2003)。政治學概論。復旦大學出版社。
陳玉書(2022),資料蒐集方法(一):調查研究法,於許春金等合著。刑事司法與犯罪學研究方法(增訂第二版,頁117-147) 。五南出版社。
許春金、呂宜芬、楊士隆、林育聖、周愫嫻、鄭瑞隆、沈勝昂、陳玉書、黃翠紋、謝文彥、黃富源、戴伸峰、曾淑萍、賴擁連、邱獻輝、董旭英、林明傑、孟維德、許華孚…侯崇文(2022)。刑事司法與犯罪學研究方法(增訂第二版)。五南出版社。
楊士隆(2022),刑事司法與犯罪學研究倫理,於許春金等合著。刑事司法與犯罪學研究方法(增訂第二版,頁17-45) 。五南出版社。
戴伸峰(2022),資料蒐集方法(一):信度與效度,於許春金等合著。刑事司法與犯罪學研究方法(增訂第二版,頁223-236) 。五南出版社。
蕭文龍、陳世智(2018)。Amos結構方程模式最佳入門實用書。基峰出版社。

二、期刊
吳斯茜(2020)。警察內部領導的柔話術:肯定式探詢之應用。中央警察大學行政管理學報,17,73-83。
周愫嫻、孫懿賢、張耀中、侯崇文、黃玉秀(2013)。地方民意與警察形象。中央警察大學犯罪防治學報,17,39-74。
莊宜佳(2018)。民眾對於警用密錄器的態度與執法正當性之關聯性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中央警察大學。
陳宏毅(2020)。警察敘事能力與溝通--警察柔話術的開發與嘗試。臺灣警察專科學校警察通識叢刊,特刊期,63-76。
康家誠(2019)。新移民對我國警察觀感影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中央警察大學。
彭士哲、賴擁連、楊雅琳、方呈祥(2021)。分配正義與程序正義對於矯正人員執法正當性之影響:受刑人之視角。中央警察大學警學叢刊,52(1),55-82。
賴擁連(2016)。警民接觸經驗與其對警察態度之影響性研究。中國行政評論,22(4),1-29。

貳、英文部分
Antrobus, E., Bradford, B., Murphy, K. and Sargeant, E. (2015). Community norms, procedural justice and the public perceptions of police legitimacy, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice ,31(2): 151-170.
Bayley, D., & Mendelsohn, H. (1968). Minorities and the police: Confrontation in America. New York: Free Press.
Brodeur, J. (1983). High policing and low policing: Remarks about the policing of political activities. Social Problems, 30(5), 507– 520.
Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Macmillan Education.
Barker, R. (2001). Legitimating identities: The self-presentations of rulers and subjects. Cambridge University Press.
Babbie Earl, R. (2005). The basics of social research. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York: Routledge.
Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.
Bradford, B., Murphy, K., & Jackson, J. (2014). Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re) production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology, 54(4),527-550.
Bottoms, E. A. & Tankebe, J. (2013). ‘A voice within’: Power-holders’ perspectives on authority and legitimacy. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701996.001.0001
Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., & Shapiro, D. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 300–315.
Brown, B., & Benedict, W. R. (2002). Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management,25,543-580.
Cao, L., & Dai, M. (2006). Confidence in the police: where does Taiwan rank in the world?. Asian Journal of Criminology, 1(1), 71-84.
Cao, L., Huang, L., & Sun, I.Y. (2014), Policing in Taiwan: From authoritarianism to democracy. Routledge, New York, NY.
Cao, L. (2015). Differentiating confidence in the police, trust in the police, and satisfaction with the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(2), 239-249.
Cao, L., Stack, S., & Sun, Y. (1998). Public attitudes toward the police: A comparative study between Japan and America. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(4), 279-289.
Coicaud, Jean-Marc. (2002). Legitimacy and politics: A contribution to the study of political right and political responsibility. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Cao, L., & Hou, C. (2001). A comparison of confidence in the police in China and in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(2), 87-99.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nded). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386.
Cao,L.,Luo,F.,Lai,Y.L.,& Zhang,Y.(2022) In times of political crisis, why people support the police: police legitimacy in Taiwan. International Criminology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-022-00070-1 (published online:17 September 2022 )
Chang, C., Lee, Y. and Hwang, C. (2008), “An evaluation research of ISO 9001 quality management system in national police administration”, Bimonthly Journal of Research, Development and Evaluation, 32(1), 6-10, (in Chinese).
Decker, S. H. (1981). Citizen attitudes toward the police: A review of past findings and suggestions for future policy. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 9(1), 80-87.
Dai, M. (2007). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati).
Dai, M., & Hu, M. (2013). Confidence in the criminal justice system: Differences between citizens and criminal justice officials in China.
https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1748895813505233.
Demir, M., Apel, R., Braga, A. A., Brunson, R. K., & Ariel, B. (2020). Body worn cameras, procedural justice, and police legitimacy: A controlled experimental evaluation of traffic stops. Justice Quarterly, 37(1), 53-84.
Ewanation, L., Bennell, C., Blaskovits, B., & Baldwin, S. (2019). Validating the police legitimacy scale with a Canadian sample. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice,61(4), 1-23.
Eckert, R. (2009). Community policing as procedural justice: An examination of Baltimore residents after the implementation of a community policing strategy. Villanova University.
Engel, R. S. (2005). Citizens' perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(4), 445-481.
Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255–279.
Gau, J. M. (2014). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A test of measurement and structure. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 187-205.
Gau, J. M., Corsaro, N., Stewart, E. A., & Brunson, R. K. (2012). Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(4), 333-343.
Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010). Four ingredients: New recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing. Policing, 4(4), 403-410.
Gaubatz, K. T. (1995). Crime in the public mind. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
Greenberg, J. (2011). Organizational justice: The dynamics of fairness in the workplace.
Grant, L., & Pryce, D. K. (2020). Procedural justice, obligation to obey, and cooperation with police in a sample of Jamaican citizens. Police Practice and Research, 21(4), 368-382.
Guzy, N., & Hirtenlehner, H. (2015). Trust in the German police: Determinants and consequences for reporting behavior. In trust and legitimacy in criminal justice (pp. 203-229). Springer, Cham.
Hawdon, J. (2008). Legitimacy, trust, social capital, and policing styles: A theoretical statement. Police Quarterly, 11(2), 182-201.
Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27-42.
Hinds, L. (2009). Youth, police legitimacy and informal contact. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 24(1), 10-21.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Homolova, P. (2018). Theories of police legitimacy–its sources and effects. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philosophica et Historica, 24(2), 93-113.
Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013). The drivers of police legitimacy: Some European research. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 8(2), 144-165.
Hu, M., & Dai, M. (2013). Confidence in the criminal justice system: Differences between citizens and criminal justice officials in China. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14(4), 503-524.
Huq, A. Z., Jackson, J., & Trinkner, R. (2016). Acts that legitimate: Widening the array of predicate policing practices. (Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 570). University of Chicago.
Homolová, P. (2014). Trust in Criminal Justice and Compliance with the Law in Czech Society: Testing the Normative Hypothesis on 1999 and 2011 Samples. Journal of Criminal Justice & Security, 16(4), 412–434.
Hu, X., Dai, M., DeValve, M. J., & Lejeune, A. (2020). Understanding public attitudes towards the police: Co-variates of satisfaction, trust, and confidence. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 62(1), 26-49.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2009). Crime, policing and social order: on the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. British Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 493-521.
Jackson, J., Tyler, T. R., Bradford, B., Taylor, F., & Shiner, M. (2010). Legitimacy and
procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4-10.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., & Murray, K. H. (2011). Policing by consent and public compliance with the law: Notes on legal legitimacy and cynicism. Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice. London: Routledge.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051-1071.
Johnson, R. (2004). Citizen expectations of police traffic stop behavior. Policing: An
International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 27, 487−497.
Judge, G. G., Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., Lütkepohl, H., & Lee, T. C. (1988). Introduction to the theory and practice of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., MacQueen, S., & Hough, M. (2016a). Truly free consent? Clarifying the nature of police legitimacy. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2620274.
Jackson, J., Hough, M., Bradford, B., & Kuha, J. (2016b). Empirical legitimacy as two connected psychological states. Trust and legitimacy in criminal justice ,137-160.
Jackson, J., & Sunshine, J. (2007). Public confidence in policing: A neo-Durkheimian perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 47(2), 214-233.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010). Police legitimacy: A conceptual review. Available at SSRN 1684507.
Jonathon-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2009). Does police performance increase in importance for the public during times of security threats, and do evaluations of procedural justice decline in importance? Findings from a quasi-experimental study of antecedents of police legitimacy in Israel. Israel: Hebrew University.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2019). Measuring public attitudes towards the police.
Lai, Y. (2013). Policing diversity: Determinants of White. Black, and Hispanic attitudes toward police, El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
Lai, Y.-L., Cao, L., & Zhao, J. (2010). The impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: A comparison between China and Taiwan. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38 (5), 934-941.
Lai, Y. L., & Zhao, J. S. (2010). The impact of race/ethnicity, neighborhood context, and police/citizen interaction on residents' attitudes toward the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 685-692.
Lee, Y. H., & Cho, S. (2019). The significance of instrumental pathways to legitimacy and public support for policing in South Korea: Is the role of procedural fairness too small? Crime, Law and Social Change, 1-29.[on line version]
Loader, I., & Mulcahy, A. (2003). Policing and the condition of England: Memory, politics and culture. Oxford University Press.
Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2013). Unfinished business: Legitimacy, crime control and democratic politics. Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration. Oxford University Press.
Loader, I. (2016). In search of civic policing: recasting the ‘Peelian’principles. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10(3), 427-44.
Liu, S., & Liu, J. (2017). Police legitimacy and compliance with the law among Chinese youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3536-3561.
Li, F., Sun, I. Y., Wu, Y., & Liu, S. (2021). The mediating roles of law legitimacy and police legitimacy in predicting cooperation with police in China. Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 201-219.
McLean, K. (2020). Revisiting the role of distributive justice in Tyler's legitimacy theory. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(2), 335-346.
Martin, R., & Bradford, B. (2019). The anatomy of police legitimacy: Dialogue, power and procedural justice. Theoretical Criminology. Epub ahead of print 19 December. DOI: 10.1177/1362480619890605.
McCabe, S., Wallington, P., Alderson, J., Gostin, L., and Mason, C. (1988). The police, public order and civil liberties. Routledge.
Manning, P. (1997). Police work, (2nd edition). Waveland Press.
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimacy in policing: A systematic review. Campbell systematic reviews, 9(1), i-147.
Murphy, K., & Gaylor, A. (2010). Policing youth: Can procedural justice nurture youth cooperation with police? (Vol. 6). Australia: Alfred Deakin Research Institute, Deakin University.
Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18(2), 136-155.
Moravcová, E. (2016). Willingness to cooperate with the police in four central European countries. European. Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(1), 171–187.
Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., & Wolfe, S. E. (2020). Testing a theoretical model of perceived audience legitimacy: The neglected linkage in the dialogic model of police–community relations. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(2), 217-259.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approach(6ed.). Boston: MA: Pearson Education.
Peršak, N. (2014). Beyond procedural justice: Some neglected aspects of legitimacy of criminal law, policy and justice. In N. Peršak (Ed.). Legitimacy and trust in criminal law, policy, and justice: Norms, procedures, outcomes (1–12). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Paul, J., J'ona, M., & Nazi, N. (1995). Public attitudes toward the police. American Journal of Police, 14(2), 67-88.
Pryce, D. K. (2016). Does procedural justice influence general satisfaction with police? A study from a hard-to-reach population of immigrants in the United States. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(1), 31-48.
Reisig, M. D., & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 607-630.
Ren, L., Cao, L., Lovrich, N., & Gaffney, M. (2005). Linking confidence in the police with the performance of the police: Community policing can make a difference. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 55-66.
Reiner, R. (2010). The politics of the police. Oxford University Press.
Reiss, A. J. (1971). The police and the public. Yale University Press.
Reisig, M. D. (2007). Procedural justice and community policing—What shapes residents’ willingness to participate in crime prevention programs? Policing, 1(3), 356–369.
Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005-1028.
Reisig, M. D., Wolfe, S. E., & Holtfreter, K. (2011). Legal cynicism, legitimacy, and criminal offending: The nonconfounding effect of low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1265-1279.
Reisig, M. D., & Giacomazzi, A. L. (1998). Citizen perceptions of community policing: Are attitudes toward police important?. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21, 547-561.
Rosenbaum, D. P., Schuck, A. M., Costello, S. K., Hawkins, D. F., & Ring, M. K. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 343-365.
Ruane, J. M. (2005). Essentials of research methods: A guide to social science research. Blackwell publishing.
Reisig, M. D., & Lloyd, C. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: Results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 42–62.
Scaglion, R., & Condon, R. G. (1980). Determinants of attitudes toward city police. Criminology, 17(4), 485-494.
Schafer, J. A., Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. S. (2003). Citizen perceptions of police services: Race, neighborhood context, and community policing. Police Quarterly, 6(4), 440-468.
Sun, I. Y., Jou, S., Hou, C. C., & Chang, Y. C. (2014). Public trust in the police in Taiwan: A test of instrumental and expressive models. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 47(1), 123-140.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Steiner, B., & Wooldredge, J. (2015). Examining the sources of correctional officer Legitimacy. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105(3), 679-704.
Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., Braithwaite, J., Inkpen, N., & Teh, M. M. (1998). Experiments in restorative policing: A progress report. Canberra: Australian National University.
Sherman, L. W. (2002). Trust and confidence in criminal justice. National Institute of Justice Journal, 248, 22-31.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice for legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513-548.
Stack, S. J., & Cao, L. (1998). Political conservatism and confidence in the police: A comparative analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 21(1), 71-76.
Sun, I. Y., Wu, Y., Hu, R., & Farmer, A. K. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: Does western wisdom hold in China?. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(4), 454-478.
Tyler, T. (1990). Why Do People Obey The Law? New Haven: Yale.
Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter?. Criminology, 47(4), 1265-1293.
Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135.
Tankebe, J., Reisig, M. D., & Wang, X. (2016). A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: A cross-cultural assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 11-22.
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y.J. (2002). Trust in the law. Russell Sage.
Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84-99.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.
Tyler, T. R. (2008). Psychology and institutional design. Review of Law & Economics, 4(3), 801-887.
Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 231(6), 231–275.
Tyler, T. R., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 751–785.
Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44(2), 365–402.
Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Triola, V. (2021). Understanding the importance of ethics in criminal justice research.
Vito, G. F., Latessa, E. J., & Wilson, D. G. (1988). Introduction to criminal justice research methods. CC Thomas.
Wu, Y., Sun, I. Y., & Triplett, R. A. (2009). Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?. Justice Quarterly, 26(1), 125-156.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2006). Race and policing in America: Conflict and reform. Cambridge University Press.
Worden, R. E., & McLean, S. J. (2017). Mirage of police reform. In mirage of police reform. University of California Press.
Wolfe, S. E., & Piquero, A. R. (2011). Organizational justice and police misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 332-353.
Wales, H. W., Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Procedural justice and the mental health court judge's role in reducing recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 265-271.
Wells, W. (2007). Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police–citizen contacts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(6), 612-621.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. In G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds). New York: Bedminster.(Original work published 1947).
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Fьnfte, revidierte Auflage, besorgt von J. Winckelmann. Studienausgabe.
Wu, Y., Sun, I. Y., & Cao, L. (2017). Immigrant perceptions of the police. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 19(3), 171-186.
Zamble, E., & Annesley, P. (1987). Some determinants of public attitudes toward the police. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 285-290.
Zhu, H., Wang, L., Lu, J., Guo, J., & Zhou, L. (1995). The international crime (victim) survey in Beijing. Criminal victimization in the developing world, 67-87.

參、網路資源
中華民國內政部/主題服務/政府資訊公開/國賠年度統計。https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=137 ,最後造訪日:2021年2月9日。
中華民國監察院/監察院/監察委員新聞稿https://www.cy.gov.tw/News.aspx?n=125&sms=8912,最後造訪日:2021年5月4日。
內政部警政署/資訊公開/警政統計/警政統計通報。https://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/lp?ctNode=12594&xq_xCat=30&mp=1,最後造訪日:2021年2月8日。
內政部警政署/資訊公開/警政統計/警政統計年報/重要統計結果。https://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/lp?ctNode=12902&CtUnit=2666&BaseDSD=7&mp=1,最後造訪日:2021年2月8日。
內政部警政署署長信箱統計資料,https://data.gov.tw/dataset/87496,最後造訪日:2022 年 10 月 4 日。
司法院法學資料檢索系統,https://law.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/default.aspx,最後造訪日:2020年7月19日。
全國法規資料庫,https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0080122&kw=民防團隊編組訓練演習服勤及支援軍事勤務辦法,最後造訪日:2022年10月7日。
桃園市政府民政局全球資訊網/桃園市各區現住人口數、原住民人口數人數統計表/2021年9月份現住人口及原住民人口數。Https://cab.tycg.gov.tw/home.jsp?id=10514&parentpath=0,10432,10513,最後造訪日:2020年11月26日。
桃園市政府衛生局全球資訊網/桃園市歷史及簡介,https://dph.tycg.gov.tw/agefriendly/home.jsp?id=14&parentpath=0,4 ,最後造訪日2020年11月26日。
國立中正大學犯罪研究中心 /司法與犯罪防制滿意度調查https://deptcrc.ccu.edu.tw/index.php?option=module&lang=cht&task=showlist&id=118&index=1,最後造訪日:2021年4月28日。
監察院首頁。https://www.cy.gov.tw/IntraMember.aspx?n=56&sms=0。最後造訪日:2022年8月8日。

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE