壹、中文部分
王維國(2016)。體驗學習在綜合活動學習領域之運用。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(2)，58-63。
行政院(2021) 。技術及職業教育政策綱領。行政院 110 年 2 月 24 日院臺教字第 1100005046 號函修正。
何英奇、毛國楠、張景媛、周文欽 (2015)。學習輔導(第二版)。新北市:心理。
余舜基(2016)。國小教育機構學習態度、網路學習社群對數學科學習成效模式之建構與驗證。教育學報，44(2)，81-99。
吳中勤(2021)。STEAM教學融入程式設計課程對幼兒職前教師問題解決創造力之影響。數位學習科技期刊，13(1)，49-75。
吳守從、李苾文、陳姵純、黃馨(2017)。應用重要-表現程度分析法探討大學生專業英語學習成效－以觀光管理學系學生為例。遠東通識學報，11(1)，21-44。
吳佳慧(2021)。主題式教學法對提升國小學童英語聽力及口說能力之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南大學，台南市。
吳易齡(2005)。商職原住民學生學習成效影響之相關因素研究。關山工商學報，1，29-34。
吳清山(2017)。素養導向教師教育：理念、挑戰與實踐。學校行政，112，14-27。
吳璧純(2017)。素養導向教學之學習評量。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(3)，30-34。
李雅莉(2020)。新時代良師──教師圖像與教師專業素養指引。師友雙月刊，621，9-11。
李懿芳(2019)。芬蘭現象本位教學課程改革之理念與實踐。教育政策論壇，2，1-26。
林永豐(2017)。十二年國民基本教育課程總綱學習重點的規劃思維與意涵。課程與教學，20(1)，105-125。
林佳慧、劉理枝、盧奕利(2017)。綜合活動領域素養導向教學實踐－以[心靈即時通]為例。教育脈動，10，1-8。
林坤誼(2021)。STEM跨領域教學合作設計模式與有效失敗經驗設計之研究。人文社會科學研究教育類，15(2)，1-18。
林堂馨(2018)。自主學習的五大發展趨勢。教育研究月刊，295，126-145。
胡淑華、蔡孟蓉(2019)。國中機器人STEAM跨領域課程發展研究：以彰化縣二水國中培龍計畫為例。數位學習科技期刊，11(4)，51-75。
范斯淳、游光昭(2016)。科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊，61(2)，153-183。
范德鑫(1992)。共變數分析功能、假設及使用之限制，師大學報，37，133-163。
夏惠汶(2017)。PTS 教學法：微型社會中的主題式教與學。學富文化。
奚少儀(2021)。電子白板的教學應用對臺南市國小高年級學生 學習態度、學習動機及學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學，台南市。
張春興 (2013)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。
張春興(2007)。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐(重修二版)。臺北市：東華。
張新仁(2019)。分組合作學習：自發、互動、共好的實踐(初版)。臺灣：教育部國民及學前教育署。
張鎮遠(2022)。以體驗學習進行素養教學之初探，體驗教育學報，14，29-47.
教育部(2012)。現代公民核心能力養成計畫。取自人文社會科學相關領域入口網。https://hss.edu.tw/HssWeb/wSite/ct?xItem=3059&ctNode=301&mp=4
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。教育部。
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校－綜合活動領域。國家教育研究院。
教育部(2019)。終身學習的教師圖像。取自http://203.71.221.9/board/doc/13058.pdf
符碧真(2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，059-087。
郭穎蓁(2022) 比較兩種英語歌謠教學課程對台灣國小二年級學童音韻覺識和英語學習態度成效之硏究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
陳佩英(2018)。跨領域素養導向課程設計工作坊之構思與實踐。課程研究，13(2)，21-42。
陳武雄、李佩珊(2021)。大學校院學生運動員運動心理素養模組探究，中華體育季刊，35(4)，p261-270.
陳家煒(2021)。北區科技大學學生生活壓力與學習態度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學，台北市。
陳碧祺、李佩綺(2021)。體驗式學習融入素養導向童軍課程之教學行動研究，國立高雄師範大學高雄師大學報，51，49-72。
曾婉婷(2016)。成人自我導向學習量表之編製研究(未出版之碩士論文)，國立嘉義大學，嘉義縣。
黃旭鈞(2017)。知識經濟時代核心素養之探討。師友月刊，595，16-21。
黃敬仁、蘇皇文、王硯聰、柯元植、劉建生、林建華(2008)，數位學習中學習者風格對學習滿意度與學習績效之影響分析。商業現代化學刊，4(3)，67-80。
楊芳怡(2017)。運用探究實驗教學提升問題解決能力之行動研究-以八年級數理資優班為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學，新北市。
楊俊鴻、張茵倩、張淑惠(2018)。素養導向課程與教學。高等教育出版社。
臺灣PISA國家研究中心(2022)。國際學生能力評量計畫計劃簡介。取自臺灣PISA國家研究中心網站https://pisa.irels.ntnu.edu.tw/about.html
蔡清田(2016)。「領域/科目核心素養」的課程設計。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(5)，142-147.
鄭窈窕(2020)。樂齡大學學員人際關係、知覺教師教學型態與學習成效之關聯性。慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊，25，130-165。
蕭佳純(2015)。國小學童科學創造力成長歷程之縱貫性分析。科學教育學刊，23(1)，23-51。
顏毓菁(2018)。生物專題導向學習活動對高三學生生命態度、學習動機與合作問題解決能力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
蘇意評(2019)。互動式APP-Plickers 融入國小六年級數學領域教學之研究－以柱體的體積為例(未出版之碩士論文)。高苑科技大學，高雄市。

 
貳、英文部分
Abdullah, Z. D., & Mustafa, K. I. (2019). The underlying factors of computer self-efficacy and the relationship with students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5(1), 346-354.
Achor, S. (2012). Positive intelligence: Three ways individuals can cultivate their own sense of well-being and set themselves up to succeed. Harvard Business Review, 90(1/2), 100-102.
Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado learning attitudes about science survey. Physical Review Special Topics-physics Education Research, 2(1), 010101.
Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning,and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150-161.
Aloysius, E., & Emmanuel, C. (2014). Generic skills and technical, vocational education and training students’ attitudes in akwa ibom state, nigeria. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(3A), 387-390.
American Institutes for Research [AIR] (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/422006.
Andrews, M. E., Borrego, M. & Boklage, A. (2021). Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace. IJ STEM Ed 8, 24.
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), Article 2.
Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661-670.
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16, 74-94.
Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532-535.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Bernard, H. R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Sage, Newbury Park.
Bhardwaj, J. (2017). In search of self-efficacy: Development of a new instrument for first year computer science students. Computer Science Education, 27(2), 79-99.
Blicker, L. (2005). Evaluating quality in the online classroom. In Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (pp.882-890). IGI Global.
Blom, N., & Bogaers, A. (2020). Using linkography to investigate students’ thinking and information use during a STEM task. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 1-20.
Bradley, Rachel L., Browne, Blaine L., & Kelley, Heather, M. (2017). Examining the influence of self-efficacy and self-regulation in online learning. College Student Journal, 51(4), 518-530.
Brown, N. C., & Wilson, G. (2018). Ten quick tips for teaching programming. PloS Computational Biology, 14(4), 1-8.
Brown, S. A., Fuller, R. M., & Vician, C. (2004). Who’s afraid of the virtual world? Anxiety and computer-mediated communication. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(2), 2.
Burghardt, M. D., Lauckhardt, J., Kennedy, M., Hecht, D., & McHugh, L. (2015). The effects of a mathematics infusion curriculum on middle school student mathematics achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 204-215.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. The Technology and Engineering. Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington. VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Cadavid, C. (2003). Teaching english in primary school through a spiral thematic curriculum. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje Y Cultura, 8(14), 81-97.
Cameron, L. (2010). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733109.009
Cheah, C. S. (2020). Factors contributing to the difficulties in teaching and learning of computer programming: A literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 272.
Chen, I. S. (2017). Computer self-efficacy, learning performance, and the mediating role of learning engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 362-370.
Chu, W. H. (2016). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students' English learning achievement and attitude (Unpublished master thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan. Taipei,Taiwan.
Chumdari , Sri A., Budiyono, Nunuk S. (2018). Implementation of thematic instructional model in elementary school. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(4), 23-31.
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2005). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. SanFrancisco: Pfeiffer.
Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications. for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
Dillette, A., & Sipe, L. (2018). A systematic framework of experiential learning: Challenging educators to make college more than an aggregation of credits. Creative Education, 9(9), 1426-1443.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D., Saxena, A. & Basnet, R. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: Exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4), 355-369.
Donegan-Ritter, M. (2017). STEM for all children: Preschool teachers supporting engagement of children with special needs in physical science learning centers. Young Exceptional Children, 20(1), 3–15.
Elashoff, D. (1969).Analysis of covariance：A delicate instrument. American Educational Research Journa, 6(3), 383-401。
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Suppl 1), 5-24.
Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lou, S. J. (2018). Why do students present different design objectives in. engineering design projects? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(4), 1039-1060.
Farid, G., & Mirsaeed, S. J. G. (2017). The impact of inquiry-basd learning approach on critical thinking skill of EFL students. EFL Journal, 2(2), 3-5.
Freeman, C. C., & Sokoloff, H. (1995). Toward a theory of thematic curricula: Constructing new learning environments for teachers & learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA/AAPE),3(14), 1-14.
Fristiara, C., & Rahmawati, R. (2017). The use of theme-based approach in teahing young learners’ vocabulary of English club at Hur Hidayah Islamic Elemetary School. TEYLIN teaching english to young learners in indonesia: Preceeding the 2nd internation conference on TEYLIN. Universatias Muria Kudus.
Garaigordobil, M. (2006). Intervention in creativity with children aged 10 and 11 years: Impact of a play program on verbal and graphic-figural creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 329-345.
Gedeon, S. A. & Valliere, D. (2018). Closing the loop: Measuring entrepreneurial self-efficacy to assess student learning outcomes. Entrepreneurship Education & Pedagogy, 1(4), 272-303.
Glancy, A. W., & Moore, T. J. (2013). Theoretical foundations for effective STEM learning environments. School of Engineering Education Working Papers (Paper 1). Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enewp/1
Gorson, J., O'Rourke, E. (2020). Why do CS1 students think they're bad at programming? Investigating self-efficacy and self-assessments at three universities. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 170-181), Virtual Event, New Zealand.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 233-240.
Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia.
Guglielmino. P. J., & Roberts. D. G. (1992). A comparison of self-directed learning readiness in U.S. and Hong Kong samples and the implications for job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 3(3), 261–271.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 6(1), 11-29.
Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: learning without Limits via computer, Ablex Publishing Corporation, New Jersey.
Hoffman, B., & Schraw, G. (2010). Conceptions of efficiency: Applications in learning and problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 1-14.
Jackson, A., Godwin, A., Bartholomew, S., & Mentzer, N. (2021). Learning from failure: A systematized review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-021-09661-x
John, Y. J. (2015). A “New” thematic, integrated curriculum for primary schools of Trinidad and tobago: A paradigm shift. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 172-187.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Active learning—Beyond the Future, 59-71.
Juan, Y. K., & Chao, T. W.(2015). Game-based learning for green building education. Sustainability, 7(5), 5592-5608.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415.
Kaiser, H.F. (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kanaparan, G., Cullen, R., & Mason, D. (2019). Effect of self-efficacy and emotional engagement on introductory programming students. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, 1-24.
Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40, 645-650.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, 1, 383-434.
Keller, J. M.(1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. Aspects of Educational Technology, 17, 140-145.
Keller, J. M.(1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
Keller, J.M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (2017). Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university. New York, NY: Springer.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco. CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Kleebbuaa, C., & Siriparpa, T. (2016). Effects of education and attitude on essential learning outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 941-949.
Kong, S. C. (2017). Development and validation of a programming self-efficacy scale for senior primary school learners. In S. C. Kong, J. Sheldon, & K. Y. Li (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Thinking Education(pp. 97-102), The Education University of Hong Kong.
Korkmaz, Ö., Cakir, R., & Ö zden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558-569.
Kukul, V., & Karatas, S. (2019). Computational thinking self-efficacy scale: Development, validity and reliability. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 151-164.
Kukul, V., Gokcearslan, S., & Gunbatar, M. S. (2017). Computer programming selfefficacy scale (CPSES) for secondary school students: Development, validation and reliability. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(1), 158-179.
Lee, Y. J. (2011). A study on the effect of teaching innovation on learning effectiveness with learning satisfaction as a mediator. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 19(2), 92-101.
Leidinger, M. & Perels, F. (2012). Training self-regulated learning in the classroom: Development and evaluation of learning materials to train self-regulated learning during regular Mathematics lessons at primary school. Education Research International, 3, 1-14.
León-Urrutia, M., Vázquez-Cano, E., Fair, N., & López-Meneses, E. (2019). Trends and good practices in research and teaching. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Lin, K. Y., & Williams, P. J. (2016). Taiwanese preservice teachers’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics teaching intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(6), 1021-1036.
Lin, K. Y., & Williams, P. J. (2017). Two-stage hands-on technology activity to develop preservice teachers' competency in applying science and mathematics concepts. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 89-105.
Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2020). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 1-18.
Lishinski, A., Yadav, A. (2021). Self-evaluation interventions: Impact on self-efficacy and performance in introductory programming. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 21(3), 1-28.
Loughran, S. B. (2005). Thematic teaching in action. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(3), 112-117.
Maltese, A. V., Simpson, A., & Anderson, A. (2018). Failing to learn: The impact of failures during making activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 116-124.
McRae-Jones, W. J. (2017). Using Inquiry-Based Instructional Strategies to Increase Student Achievement in 3 rd Grade Social Studies (Doctoral dissertation, Brenau University).
Melchior, A., Cohen, F., Cutter, T., Leavitt, T. & Manchester, N. H. (2005). More than robots: An evaluation of the first robotics competition participant and institutional impacts. Heller School for Social Policy and Management. Brandeis University.
Mohanty, M. S. (2012). Effects of positive attitude & optimism on wage & employment: A double selection approach. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 304-16.
Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D. L., Speler, L., Schooler, W., & Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing middle school students’ interests in STEM via summer learning experiences: See blue STEM camp. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 291–301.
Mølstad, C. E., ＆ Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329– 344.
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp.35-60). Purdue University Press.
Motiwalla, L., & Tello, S. (2000). Distance learning on the Internet: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), 253-264.
Murdoch, D. D., Gregory, A., & Eggleton, J. M. (2015). Why psychology? An investigation of the training in psychological literacy in nursing, medicine, social work, counselling. Psychology and Clinical Psychology. Canadian Psychology, 56(1), 136-146.
Obama, B. H. (2016). State of the union address as delivered. speech, Capitol Hill, Washington, DC, January, 12. Smith, M. (2016). Computer science for all. The White House, President Barack Obama. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. France, Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume V): Collaborative problem solving. France,Paris:OECD.http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en
Ortiz, M., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2017). Gamification in computer programming: Effects on learning, engagement, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Games Based Learning (ECGBL 2017) (pp.507-514), Graz, Austria.
Ozyurt, H., & Ozyurt, O. (2018). Analyzing the effects of adapted flipped classroom approach on computer programming success, attitude toward programming, and programming self-efficacy. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(6), 2036-2046.
Patrick, L. B., James, P. C., Donna, M., Christopher, W. D., & Alicia, B. (2016). An examination of middle school students STEM self-efficacy with relation to interest and perceptions of STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 17(3), 27-37.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). CA: SAGE.
Phelan, J., Ing, M., Nylund-Gibson, K., & Brown, R. S. (2017). Identifying students’ expectancy-value beliefs: A latent class analysis approach to analyzing middle school students’ science self-perceptions. Journal of STEM Education, 18(1), 11-15.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2012). The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland’s theory. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 550-575.
Portsmore, M. (2015). Engineering education for children: Design & creativity in the classroom. Paper presented at the KASE International Conference. Daejeon, South Korea.
Press, O. U. (2020). Inquiry-based learning: 4 essential principles for the ELT classroom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Psycharis, S., & Kallia, M. (2017). The effects of computer programming on high school students’ reasoning skills and mathematical self-efficacy and problem solving. Instructional Science, 45(5), 583-602.
Quinn, C. (2018). mLearning: Mobile, wireless and in-your-pocket learning. http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
Robins, A. V. (2019). 12-Novice programmers and introductory programming. The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research, 15, 327-376.
Rojas ‐ Drummond, S., Mazón, N., Littleton, K., & Vélez, M. (2014). Developing reading comprehension through collaborative learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(2), 138-158.
Santana, R. (2018). Intergrating inquiry-based physical science lessons with English language development. Califonia State University, Long Beach, CA.
Sarama, J., Clements, D., Nielsen, N., Blanton, M., Romance, N., Hoover, M., Staudt, C., Baroody, A., McWayne, C., & McCulloch, C. (2018). Considerations for STEM eucation from prek through grade 3. Community for Advancing Discovery Research in Education (CADRE).
Schaefer, J. M. (2014). The impact of a collaborative inquiry-based professional development approach on teacher practice and student reading achievement: A mixed methods study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas at Little Rock).
Sentance, S., Waite, J., Hodges, S., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2017). "Creating cool stuff" pupils' experience of the BBC micro:bit. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 531-536).
Shiri, A., & Phillip, W. (2009). Effects of classwide peer tutoring on the performance of sixth grade students during a volleyball unit. Physical Educator, 66(1), 12-22.
Silva, L., Mendes, A., Gomes, A., & Cavalcanti-De-Macedo, G. (2021). Regulation of learning interventions in programming education: A systematic literature review and guideline proposition. Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 13-20), Virtual Event, USA.
Silvia, P. J., Benjamin, W., Roni, R. P., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 6(1), 19-34.
Skinner, C. H. (2010). Applied comparative effectiveness researchers must measure learning rates: A commentary on efficiency articles. Psychology in the Schools, 47(2), 166-172.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, 4, 388-404.
Sochaka, N., Guyotte, K., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning together: A collaborative autoenthnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 15-42.
Steinhorst, P., Petersen, A., & Vahrenhold, J. (2020). Revisiting self-efficacy in introductory programming. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER’20) (pp.158-169), Virtual Event, New Zealand.
Stevens, J. (1990). Intermediate statistics: A modern approach. NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stohlmann, M. (2017). Middle school students first experience with mathematical modeling. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 56–71.
Stohlmann, M. (2019). Three modes of STEM integration for middle school mathematics teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 119(5), 287-296.
Sung, E., & Kelly, T. R. (2018). Identifying design process patterns: A sequential analysis study of design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 283-302.
Suprapto, N. (2016). Students’ attitudes towards STEM education: Voices from indonesian junior high schools. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(special), 75-87.
Taylor, Shirley., & Peter A. Todd. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.
Tezer, M. (2019). The role of mathematical modeling in STEM Integration and education. In theorizing STEM education in the 21st century(pp.1-14).IntechOpen.
Theodoropoulos, A., Antoniou, A., & Lepouras, G. (2017). Teacher and student views on educational robotics: The Pan-Hellenic competition case. Application and Theory of Computer Technology, 2(4), 1-23.
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2.
Trueman, R. J. (2014). Productive failure in STEM education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(3), 199-214.
Tsai, M. J., Wang, C. Y., & Hsu, P. F. (2018). Developing the computer programming self-efficacy scale for computer literacy education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1345-1360.
Turel, Y. K. & Ozer Sanal, S.(2018). The effects of an ARCS based e-book on student's achievement, motivation and anxiety. Computers and Education, 127, 130-140.
United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
Wang, A. I., Elvemo, A. A., & Gamnes, V. (2014). Three social classroom applications to improve student attitudes. Education Research International, 2014, 1-14.
Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.
Warren, S. J., Dondlinger, M. J., & Barab, S. A. (2008). A MUVE towards PBL writing: Effects of a digital learning environment designed to improve elementary student writing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,41(1).113-140.
Watts, D.M. (1983). Somealternative views of energy.Physics Education, 18(5), 213-217.
Webb, M., Davis, N., Bell, T., Katz, Y. J., Reynolds, N., Chambers, D. P., & Sysło, M. M. (2017). Computer science in K-12 school curricula of the 2lst century: Why, what and when? Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 445–468.
Wells, John G. (2016). PIRPOSAL Model of Integrative STEM Education: Conceptual and Pedagogical Framework for Classroom Implementation. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 12-19.
Willis, D. (2015). Conversational English: teaching spontaneity. In M. Pawlak & W. K. Ewa(Eds.), Issues in teaching, learning and testing speakingin a second language (3-18).Springer Heidelberg.
Winstone, N. E., & Kinchin, I. M. (2017). Teaching sensitive issues: Psychological literacy as an antidote to pedagogic frailty. Psychology Teaching Review, 23(1), 15-29.
Wongse-ek, W., Wills, G., & Gilbert, L. (2014). Calculating trustworthiness based on learning outcome. Proceedings of E-Learn: World conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2014 (pp. 2085-2090). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA.
Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of coceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal od Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415.
Xia, L., & Zhong, B. (2018). A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12. Computers & Education. 127. 267-282.
Yang, C. C. R. (2009). Theme-based teaching in an English course for primary ESL students in Hong Kong. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(2), 161–176.
Yue, J., Wu, Q., Li, J., & Wen, S. (2019) Study on the influence of mental health course on the mental health level of college students. Creative Education, 10, 3286-3292.
Zhao, J. J., & Zhao, S. Y. (2010). The impact of IQ＋EQ＋CQ integration on student productivity in web design and development. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(1), 43-53.
Ziaddini, M., & Mohammadi, H. (2013). Studying the relationship between workplace incivility and employees’ job positive attitude in Rafsanjan Tejarat Banks. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 3(4), 216-230.