:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:五專學生參與線上課程學習成效相關因素研究
作者:熊漢琳
作者(外文):Hsiung, Han-Lin
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:公民教育與活動領導學系
指導教授:劉若蘭
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2024
主題關鍵詞:線上學習學習成效理性行為理論社會學習理論On-line LearningLearning EffectivenessRational Behavior TheorySocial Learning Theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
過去的幾年間因著Covid-19疫情起伏不定的影響,國內各級學校時常需要施行遠距教學。在實施線上課程時,學生在家或是其他遠距地點連線上課,與老師以及同學僅能藉由視訊互動,無法實體互動,授課教師也經常無法確實掌控學生的學習狀況;因此,線上學習成效可能會受到影響。以往的研究也針對此現象有多所關注。但仍存在以下的問題:第一、大都數的研究皆針對大學生,卻沒有針對五專學生線上課程的實證研究;第二、較少探討師生互動關係以及同儕之間的影響對於線上課程參與的影響;第三、較少針對五專學生背景資料對線上學習參與意向以及學習成效進行差異化分析。尤其是五專學生由於與同班同學以及老師間的關係遠比其他學制來得親近,當全面實施線上教學時,受到衝擊可能比其他的學制的學生更為強烈。因此,本研究以北部某私立大學五專部學生為研究對象,探究在疫情影響下,五專學生全面遠距教學之學習成效的影響因素。
本研究針對五專學生線上課程,藉由「理性行為理論」和「社會學習理論」釐清對於線上教學的「線上學習參與度」及「學習成效」的認知與意涵;且依據研究架構將研究變項分為:「同儕關係」、「師生互動關係」與「線上學習參與意向」三項自變量對「學習成效」的影響。本研究採用問卷調查方式,針對各系科專二以上班級收集研究資料,並對樣本進行統計分析,以檢視在Covid-19疫情影響之下,五專學生的師生關係與同儕關係對於其線上學習參與意向與線上學習成效的影響。其次,本研究也根據學生的個人背景資料,包含性別、年級、科別、參與社團、打工時數、居住處的電腦設備與頻寬等,對於研究變項進行差異化分析。此外,本研究後續輔以質性訪談,以了解五專學生對於線上學習的內在經驗之內涵。
研究結果證明了同儕關係、師生互動與線上學習參與意向對五專生線上學習成效皆具有正向顯著影響。其中,以線上學習參與意向的影響力最為重要。在差異分析方面,本研究發現五專學生是否打工、年級與打工時數,在各研究變項均無顯著差異。在科別方面,視光科在各研究變項與其他科系有顯著的差異;是否參與社團在師生互動關係上有顯著差異;學生的住宿地點與師生互動關係和線上學習參與意向有顯著的差異;住處上線的電腦設備與頻寬在學生同儕關係與學習成效上,有顯著差異。此外,本研究根據研究結果,對學校以及五專生老師提出實施線上課程的建議,由提升同儕關係、師生互動關係以及線上學習參與意向三個方面著手,提升五專生的線上學習成效。再者,本研究拓展了社會學習理論與理性行為理論結合的實證研究,提供應用在五專學生的研究案例。研究結果將做為未來網路大學的教學、提升五專學生的線上學習成效以及相關實證研究之參考依據。
Over the past few years, due to the unpredictable impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, educational institutions at all levels in the country have often needed to implement distance learning. During the implementation of online courses, students connect from home or other remote locations for virtual classes. Interactions with teachers and classmates are limited to video conferencing, and physical interactions are not possible. Teachers also often find it challenging to accurately monitor students’ learning progress. Consequently, the effectiveness of online learning may be compromised. Previous research has addressed this phenomenon, particularly focusing on university students. However, several issues persist: First, the majority of studies have concentrated on university students, with limited empirical research on junior college students in online courses; Second, there is less exploration of the impact of teacher-student interactions and peer influences on online course participation; Third, there is a lack of differentiated analysis regarding junior college students’ background data in relation to their intention to participate in online learning and learning outcomes. Particularly for junior college students, who often have closer relationships with classmates and teachers than students in other educational systems, the impact of fully implementing online teaching may be more pronounced. Therefore, this study focuses on students from the junior college department of a private university in the northern region. It aims to explore the factors influencing the learning outcomes of junior college students under the comprehensive implementation of distance learning during the pandemic.
This study focuses on junior college students in online courses, using the “Rational Behavior Theory” and “Social Learning Theory” to clarify the perception and implications of “online learning participation” and “learning outcomes” in online teaching. Based on the research framework, the study categorizes variables into three independent variables: “peer relationships”, “teacher-student interactions”, and “online learning participation intentions”, all influencing “learning outcomes”. The research adopts a questionnaire survey method, collecting data from classes at the second year and above in various departments. Statistical analysis is conducted on the samples to examine the impact of teacher-student relationships and peer relationships on the online learning participation intentions and outcomes of junior college students under the influence of the Covid-19 pandemic. Additionally, the study performs differential analysis based on students’ personal background data, including gender, grade, department, participation in clubs, working hours, and computer equipment and bandwidth at their residences. Furthermore, the study incorporates qualitative interviews to understand the nuances of junior college students' internal experiences with online learning.
The research results demonstrate that peer relationships, teacher-student interactions, and online learning participation intentions all have a significantly positive impact on the online learning outcomes of junior college students. Among these factors, the influence of online learning participation intentions is deemed most crucial. In terms of differential analysis, this study found no significant differences in whether junior college students work, their grade levels, and working hours across various research variables. Regarding the academic departments, the Optometry department showed significant differences in various research variables compared to other departments. Participation in extracurricular activities exhibited significant differences in teacher-student interactions. Students’ accommodation locations demonstrated significant differences in teacher-student interactions and online learning participation intentions. Additionally, the computer equipment and bandwidth available for online access at residences showed significant differences in peer relationships and learning outcomes for students. Furthermore, based on the research results, this study provides recommendations for schools and junior college instructors regarding the implementation of online courses. Emphasizing improvement in peer relationships, teacher-student interactions, and online learning participation intentions is suggested to enhance the online learning outcomes of junior college students. Moreover, this study expands on the empirical research by combining Social learning theory and Rational behavior theory, offering a case study applicable to junior college students. The research findings will serve as a reference for future online university teaching, improving online learning outcomes for junior college students, and related empirical research.
中文部份
丁一顧(2014)。教師專業學習社群之調查研究:「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。課程與教學,17(1),209-232。
丁振豐(2000)。動機理論:解釋名詞,教育大辭書。國家教育研究院,取自:https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309154/
王如哲(2010)。解析「學生學習成效」。評鑑雙月刊,27,62。
王志菁(2021)。新冠肺炎疫情對教育的衝擊與省思—從學生學習權的觀點分析。中華管理發展評論,10(1),1-13。
王釧渝(2022)。消費者飲食健康識能、服用行為與購買動機之研究-以保健食品為例。醒吾科技大學行銷與流通管理系所,未出版碩士論文,新北市。
王維新(2021)。補教業家長再購買意願探討。國立中央大學企業管理學系,未出版碩士論文,桃園市。
丘金蘭、胡秀媛、邱紹一(2019)。父母教養方式、教師期望與同儕互動關係之研究:以北區大學生為例。育達科大學報,47,75-118。
冉愛晶、周曉雪、蕭咪咪、崔淼(2017)。我國中小企業組織創新氛圍的架構和異質性研究。科學學與科學技術管理,38(5),73-84。
古志偉、古志銘、陳敏弘(2017)。結合二維模式與重要─表現分析法探討高雄市國民中學體育教學品質。體育學報,50(3),353-372。
江佳瑉(2022)。台灣自行車運動與休閒旅遊之研究-動機理論。運動休閒餐旅研究,17(1),1-24。
江金靜(2010)。國民小學師生關係品質與學生學習動機之研究。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所,未出版碩士論文,嘉義。
何希慧、彭耀平(2016)。臺灣與中國大陸深圳地區大學生學習動機與學習成效關係發展之比較:以學習模式為仲介變項。教育實踐與研究,29(1),139-172。
何秀滿(2017)。大學美容系學生中醫課程學習動機、學習行為與學習成效之研究。國立屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所,未出版碩士論文,屏東。
余民寧、李昭鋆(2018)。補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析。教育科學研究期刊,63(1),247-271。
吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城數位科技。
吳明隆、塗金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析(修訂版)。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳慕萱、連倖誼(2021)。情境教學影片對學習障礙生學習動機及注意力之影響。臺北市立大學學報,52(2),79-94。
李文心、黃欽永、劉兆達(2018)。大學運動選手知覺教練訓練行為、同儕關係及教練-選手關係之研究。臺大體育學報,34,27-37。
李育禪(2010)。高中生親子關係、同儕關係及自我統合關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學,未出版碩士論文,高雄。
李佳霙(2008)。高中生親子關係、性別平等觀念及同儕關係之相關研究。國立嘉義大學,未出版碩士論文,嘉義。
李依靜(2020)。大學校院學生社團參與動機與學習成效之研究-以南部地區為例。大仁科技大學休閒運動管理系休閒事業管理碩士在職專班,未出版碩士論文,屏東。
李詠吟、單文經(1997)。教學原理。臺北市:遠流。
李勇輝(2017)。學習動機、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究—以數位學習為例。經營管理學刊,14,68-86。
李堅萍(2006)。自我效能與技能課程學習成效之相關性與差異性研究:以陶藝技能為例。國教學報,28。
李駱遜(2021)。線上教學面臨的挑戰與展望。國家教育研究院電子報,213,取自:https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=213&content_no=3696
李駿豐(2013)。應用適性化學習系統提升學習成效:以動態鷹架理論為基礎。國立虎尾科技大學,未出版之碩士論文,雲林縣。
李麗君(2012)。國民中小學教師對弱勢學生低成就之歸因與其補救教學作法關係之研究。αβγ量化研究學刊,4(2),25-46。
杜瑞澤、邱淑萍、莊立文、朱維政(2013)。遠距教學之線上學習成效影響因數之研究。文化創意產業研究學報,3(4),157-166。
汪瑞芝、廖玲珠(2008)。會計習作課程之學習行為與學習成效。當代會計,9(1),105-130。
邢雅嵐(2012)。以理性行為探討學生對知識分享行為研究。大同大學資訊經營學系所,未出版碩士論文,臺北市。
阮孝齊(2020)。疫情下數位落差造成的挑戰與因應。國家教育研究院電子報,202,取自:https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=202&content_no=3552
阮孝齊(2020)。學習動機的關鍵要素:「學校歸屬感」。國家教育研究院電子報,194,取自:https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=1&edm_no=194&content_no=3446
周宇軒(2017)。網路口碑預測電影票房之研究—以創新擴散階段及動機理論探討電影口碑影響力。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系,未出版碩士論文,臺北市。
林日宗、許淑婷、洪振方(2014)。不同科學學習動機、創造傾向、師生互動對國一學生在科學創造力表現之分析。教育科學期刊,13(2),1-33。
林佳蓉(2012)。高中職學習障礙學生自我概念與同儕關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系,未出版碩士論文,彰化。
林明瑞、王聖賢(2006)。福寶濕地自然保育課程實驗教學對國小中、高年級學童在濕地自然保育認知、態度之影響。環境教育研究,4(1),103-146。
林亮均(2006)。探究線上教育遊戲對學習成效影響之研究。銘傳大學資訊管理學系,未出版碩士論文,臺北市。
林素卿(2003)。協同行動研究—以班級經營之常規改善為例。師大學報:教育類,48(1),91-112。
林淑真(2002)。國中學生班級氣氛知覺、學習態度與學業成就關係之研究-以國文科為例。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,未出版碩士論文,彰化市。
林曉雲(2022)。Covid-19各級學校學生確診案例統計。自由時報
取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3933745
林錦郎(2016)。從計畫行為理論探討數位學習平臺知識分享行為。全球商業經營管理學報,8,43-55。
林麗惠(2000)。成人學習評量面面觀。北縣成教:輔導季刊,17,4-13。
邱招婷(2010)。國民中學青年次及文化、同儕關係與生活適應相關之研究。國立屏東師範學院,未出版碩士論文,屏東。
邱皓政(2005)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(第二版)。臺北市:五南。
金子芳(2021)。青少年情緒管理、同儕關係與樂觀之關係研究。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所,未出版碩士論文,彰化。
侯正裕、陳靜枝(2012)。「網際遷移」─以人口遷移理論探索社交網站的轉換─舉Plurk為例。嶺東通識教育研究學刊,9(3),103-145。
施良方(1996)。學習理論。高雄市:麗文。
洪榮昭、孔令文、戴建耘、劉銘恩(2022)。在COVID-19 疫情下自我導向學習策略和態度對於線上學習認知疲乏、全神貫注與感知學習效果之相關性研究-以大學生為例。當代教育研究季刊,30(1),119-147。
胡依嘉(2022)。混成課程設計結合機器人創客教育應用於合作學習課程之實踐與成效:學習參與度之仲介效果。資訊管理學報,19(1),105-132
胡煜岱(2022)。家人關係、同儕關係對國中生網路遊戲消費之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育學院人類發展與家庭學系,未出版碩士論文,臺北市。
徐明珠、賀秋白(2018)。大學生物聯網學習成效-以師生互動為仲介變項。中華印刷科技年報,105-118。
徐瑋伶(2003)。工作動機研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,89-113。
張安緹、陳鴻仁(2018)。即時適性英語字彙遊戲學習系統教學之學習成效與學習動機分析。數位學習科技期刊,10(4),31-58。
張亞文(2022)。大學境外生學習動機與學習投入關係之研究-以國立暨南國際大學為例。國立暨南國際大學教育策略與行政學系,未出版碩士論文,南投。
張春興(2000)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐,東華書局,臺北市。
張庭瑋(2020)。伊朗和netflix合作、蒙古用電視教課!全球數億學生停課,催生各國新型教育實驗。商周頭條。
取自 https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/international/blog/3001938
張淩淩(2022)。國民小學校長正念領導、教師專業素養與學生學習成效關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系,未出版博士論文,臺北市。
張鳴珊(2014)。學生特質與學習狀況對學習成效之影響分析。嘉南大學休閒保健管理系校內計畫,學生特質、學習狀況與學習成果之關聯分析—子計畫二。取自:https://ir.cnu.edu.tw/bitstream/310902800/28465/1/CN10313.pdf
教育部(2021)。防疫相關資訊。
取自:https://cpd.moe.gov.tw/index_new.php?guid=BD28807E-9D44-A1D4-D795-3408DA587793
教育部(2022)。全國各級學校統計資料。
取自:https://www.edu.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=A61CAD76B12DCFB9
教育部(2023)。大專校院校務資訊公開平臺:五專。
取自:https://udb.moe.edu.tw/udata/EduSystem/%E4%BA%94%E5%B0%88/5
莊柏青(2015)。青少年同儕關係、自我認同與生活滿意度之研究。大葉大學,未出版碩士論文,彰化。
郭美貝、吳立安(2012)。美容系學生學習動機、學習滿意度與學習成效關係之研究。美容科技學刊,9(4),59-78。
郭迺鋒、袁正達、熊漢琳、鄭國強、黃駿為、吳琇絹(2015)。市場調查實務與分析,雙葉書廊有限公司,臺北市。
陳木金、蘇芳嬅、邱馨儀(2010)。國民小學教師創新班級經營指標建構之研究。創造學刊,1(2),17-42。
陳正昌(1994)。從教育機會均等觀點探討家庭、學校與國小學生學業成就之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所,未出版博士論文,臺北市。
陳秀勤(2020)。Covid-19衝擊下的網路教學:美國經驗。國家衛生研究院論壇,取自:https://forum.nhri.edu.tw/r21/
陳怡伃、黃源協(2015)。遠親或是近鄰?社區組織內外網絡對其服務績效的影響。臺大社工學刊,32(1),1-32。
陳思允(2019)。探勘線上學習模式與探討學習模式對學習成效的影響。國立中央大學資訊工程學系,未出版碩士論文,桃園。
陳春安(2021)。大學體育課學生學習動機、學習滿意度與學習成效之研究。臺大體育學報,41,19-31。
陳春安、鍾潤華(2019)。桌球課程學習動機、學習策略與學習成效之關係研究。高科大體育,2,81-95。
曾妙音、王雅玲、李瓊雯、張恬瑜(2011)。父母社經地位與國中生學習動機、學業成就之相關性研究。家庭教育雙月刊,32,6-27。
曾芳琪(2021)。遠距教學的挑戰—如何因應疫情下學習樣態改變的衝擊。台灣教育評論月刊,10(9),145-152。
曾淑美、林吉村(2014)。資訊科技涉入度與學習成效之探討-以資訊科技採用意向為仲介變數。資訊、科技與社會學報,61-86。
湯誌龍(2019)。五專學制優勢如何重新開啟。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(7),18-22。
黃加明(2022)。COVID-19後疫情時期中等學校線上及混成教學的挑戰與實踐。中等教育,73(1),96-113。
黃志燈、洪福源、高家臻(2018)。幼兒園教師的文化信念、師生互動與學生適應關係之研究。管理實務與理論研究,12(2),40-58。
黃秀芬(2020)。父母教養管理方式對學習成就之研究-以同儕關係為仲介變項。高苑科技大學企業管理系經營管理碩士班,未出版碩士論文,高雄。
黃孟立(2022)。工作動機與工作滿意度之關係-以家庭支持為調節角色與組織承諾、職業承諾為仲介角色。大葉大學管理學院博士班,未出版博士論文,彰化。
黃品柔、祁崇溥、趙宸紳、張志銘(2017)。教師教學態度對學生學習動機與學習成效之影響-以獨輪車運動為例。運動與遊憩研究,12(2),110-123。
黃國豪、陳碧茵、賴泑伶、蘇宥鋐、曹雅涵(2019)。探討先備知識對競爭遊戲式題庫練習之影響:以HTML5證照輔導為例。數位學習科技期刊,11(1),1-22。
黃添丁(2015)。數位學習融入課程之學習動機及學習行為對學習成效的影響。慈濟科技大學學報,第1期(總25期),35-52。
黃瑞成(2006)。以戶外教學進行環境教育之研究-以高美濕地為例。國立臺中教育大學環境教育研究所,未出版碩士論文,台中市。
黃德祥(2008)。青少年發展與輔導。臺北:五南。
黃韞臻、林淑惠(2014)。「大一新生學校生活適應量表」之發展。測驗學刊,61(2),259-281。
楊莉秀(2014)。高中學生學業成績、體適能表現與同儕關係之相關研究。臺北市立大學,未出版碩士論文,臺北。
楊朝旭(2005)。高中生知覺家庭氣氛、課業壓力、同儕關係與其憂鬱傾向關係之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所,未出版碩士論文,嘉義。
葉秉成、劉安婷、謝易成、柯維動(2021)。遠距教學打造台灣奇蹟!葉丙成:應趁機讓孩子學學「兩件事」。遠見雜誌。
取自:https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/80242
葉建宏、葉貞妮(2020)。Covid-19疫情下的遠距教育教學策略探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(11),145-149。
詹惠雯、沈順治(2021)。線上學習成效影響因素模式之探討。中國行政,79,1-21。
雷霞(2007)。青少年人際關係運作能力及其培育。中國青年研究,11,78-91。
齊宜恕(2012)。探究高職生英語學習動機與學業成就間之關係。中原大學應用外國語文學系,未出版博碩士論文,桃園市。
劉世華(2016)。青少年運動參與、同儕關係與幸福感之研究。大葉大學,未出版碩士論文,彰化。
劉正傑、董旭英(2017)。以同儕關係、從眾行為與認知同理心探討網路霸淩旁觀者之行為傾向。中華心理學刊,61(1),101-124。
劉秀菊、丁原鬱、鄭如安(2010)。現實治療團體輔導方案對國小國語科學業低成就學生學習態度與學習成就輔導效果之研究。教育心理學報,42(1),53-76。
劉政宏(2009)。對學習動機最有影響力的動機成分?雙核心動機模式之初探。教育心理學報,41(2),361-384。
樊祖燁、潘博宇(2021)。雙因數理論對學生學習成就之影響-以學習態度作為仲介變數。商管科技季刊,22(2),257-297。
潘秉恕(2006)。訓練成效研究:以臺電公司環境管理系統訓練為例。國立交通大學,經營管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,新竹。
蔡昕璋(2022)。疫情期間大學生自我調控學習、線上校園人際經驗與線上課程學習成效之關係研究:以2020年國立臺灣師範大學為例。學生事務與輔導,60(4),11-32。
蔡瑞君(2020)。消失或加劇的社會距離?新型冠狀病毒疫情下課程與教學數位化面臨的挑戰與契機。課程研究,15(1),35-51
鄭孟芳、林素華(2010)。國小高年級自然科學習風格、學習動機與學業成就相關研究。生物科學,52(2),39-56。
蕭妙香(2021)。遠距教學—多元化學習抑或放牛吃草?臺灣教育評論月刊,10(6),61-64。
蕭佳純、董旭英、饒夢霞(2009)。以結構方程式探討家庭教育資源、學習態度、班級互動在學習成效的作用。教育科學研究期刊,54(2),135-162。
錢昭萍、梁麗珍(2017)。動畫與繪本融入教學對不同學制與性別的學生學習之影響—以科技大學國文類通識課程為例。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報,13(3),251-282。
戴華蒂(2016)。竊盜犯罪行為成因之研究:自我控制與社會學習理論觀點之驗證。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所,未出版碩士論文,嘉義。
謝佳君(2021)。行動學習與網路素養課程對於網路素養認知、網路自我效能與同儕關係的影響。國立臺北教育大學教育學苑課程與教學傳播科技研究所,未出版碩士論文,臺北市。
謝東波(2013)。大學校院學生社團參與動機、社團涉入及學習成效之探討—以朝陽科技大學為例。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,臺中市。
韓美文(2014)。從課程與證照結合探討課程學習動機、證照取得動機及學習態度對學習成效之影響。慈濟技術學院學報,23,137-153。
簡信男(2020)。高等教育學生社團幹部學習經驗與成果指標之建構暨實證調查研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學院公民教育與活動領導學習,未出版博士論文,臺北市。
簡嘉盈、程景琳(2012)。同儕對高中生之利社會行為的影響:檢視同理心與友誼特性之調節角色。教育科學期刊,11(1),105-123。
藍俊雄、劉琇菁(2020)。合作學習對學生課堂表現之研究。兩岸職業教育論叢,4(1),72-84。
蘇玲慧(2013)。高中職學生自我概念、同儕互動與學習自我效能關係之研究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊,9,197-221。
權淑芯、梁鴻鑑、黃久秦(2012)。高中生對老化課程學習動機、學習滿意度及學習成效之探討─以新竹某私立高中為例。明新學報,38(1),189-204。

英文部份
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior. 11-39. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 1-33.
Akhtar, S., Hussain, M. U. H. A. M. M. A. D., Afzal, M., & Gilani, S. A. (2019). The impact of teacher-student interaction on student motivation and achievement. European Academic Research, 7(2), 1201-1222.
Anderson, A. (2008). Towards a Theory of Online Learning. Athabasca University Press.
Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcome of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487-500.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299-316.
Bolliger, D.U.; Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and Student Perceptions of Online Student Engagement Strategies. Distance Educ, 39, 568-583.
Brendgen, D., Doyle, A. B., & Bukowsk, M. (2002). The quality of adolescents' friendships: Associations with mothers' interpersonal relationships, attachments to parents and friends, and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 24(4), 429-445.
Brooker, A., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., Lodge, J., & Kennedy, G. (2018). A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 73-87.
Buabeng-Andoh, Charles (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 178-191.
Buckler, A. (2015). An exploratory study of student and teacher perceptions on student motivation and the teacher-student relationship (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University).
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin.
Chang, C. S., Liu, E. Z. F., Sung, H. Y., Lin, C. H., Chen, N. S., & Cheng, S. S. (2014). Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in education and teaching international, 51(4), 366-377.
Chen, P. Z., Chang, T. C., & Wu, C. L. (2020). Effects of gamified classroom management on the divergent thinking and creative tendency of elementary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 1-9.
Cheng, J., Kulkarni, C., & Klemmer, S. (2013). Tools for predicting drop‐off in large online classes. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work companion (pp. 121–124). ACM.
Cherkowski, S. (2018). Positive Teacher Leadership: Building Mindsets and Capacities to Grow Wellbeing. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 9(1), 63-78.
Chuang, T. Y., & Chen, W. F. (2009). Effect of computer-based video games on children: An experimental study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 1-10.
Cohen, A. (2017). Analysis of student activity in web‐supported courses as a tool for predicting dropout. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1285–1304.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language learning, 55(4), 613-659.
Da Silva, L., Sanson, A., Smart, D. & Tombourou, J. (2004). Civic responsibility among Australian adolescents: testing two competing models. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 229-255.
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4): p. 4.
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and Challenges in Language Learning Motivation. London Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485893
Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction. Pearson. Sage Publications.
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), n1.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C.F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian psychology/psychology Canadienne, 49(3), 233.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hamachek, D. (1987). Humanistic psychology: Theory, postulate, and implication for educational process. In J. Glover & R. Ronning (Eds.), Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Wadsworth Publishing.
Hamalik, O. (2014). Teaching and learning process. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hamidi, Hodjat & Chavoshi, Amir (2018). Analysis of the Essential Factors for the Adoption of Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Case Study of Students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1053-1070.
Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1-13.
Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159-2174.
Huang, T., Liu, Y., & Yu, P. (2016). The crucial influences of interpersonal relationships on learning motivation and performance in a cloud-based collaborative learning platform. Education Journal, 44(1), 133-157.
Huang, Yueh-Min & Liu, Chien-Hung (2009). Applying adaptive swarm intelligence technology with structuration in web-based collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 52, 789-799.
Ismail, A., Hasan, A., & Sulaiman, A.Z. (2010). Supervisor’s role as an antecedent of training transfer and motivation to learn in training programs. Acta Universitatis Danubius, 2, 18-37.
Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171.
Keegan. D. (1993). Theoretical principles of distance education. London: Routledge.
Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The Impact of an Augmented Reality Application on Learning Motivation of Students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6), 7033-7055
Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., & Kouraichi, B. (2021). Emergency remote learning during COVID-19 crisis: Students’ engagement. Education and information technologies. Retrieved from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2019/7208494/
Klein, H. A. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 150-172.
Kuh, G. D. (2016). Making learning meaningful: Engaging students in ways that matter to them. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 145, 49-56.
Lair, J. (1984). Change induction groups, group psychotherapy, integrity groups, peer counseling. Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1(2), 493-494.
Law, K., Lee, V., & Yu, Y. T. (2010). Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55(1), 218-228.
Lederman, D. (2019). Professors’ Slow, Steady Acceptance of Online Learning: A Survey. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/survey/professors-slow-steadyacceptance-online-learning-survey
Lin, C. P., & Ding, C. G. (2005). Opening the black box: assessing the mediating mechanism of relationship quality and the moderating effects of prior experience in ISP service. International Journal of Service Industry Management.
Lumsden, L. S. (1994). Student Motivation To Learn. ERIC Digest, Number 92. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED370-200)
Luo, J., & Ye, B. (2020). Role of generativity on tourists’ experience expectation, motivation and visit intention in museums. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 120-126.
Lux, G., Callimaci, A., Caron, M. A., Fortin, A., & Smaili, N. (2022). COVID-19 and emergency online and distance accounting courses: a student perspective of engagement and satisfaction. Accounting Education, 1-35.
Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26-34.
McCombs, B. L. (2000). Reducing the achievement gap society. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(5), 29-39.
Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: a systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Ningsih., Soetjipto, B. E., & Sumarmi. (2017). Improving the students’ activity and learning outcomes on social sciences subject using round table and rally coach of cooperative learning model. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(11), 30-37.
Pandey, A. & Sahu, R. (2020). Modeling the relationship between service quality, destination attachment and eWOM intention in heritage tourism. International Journal of Tourism Cities.
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611-621.
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 17, 365-386.
Picciano, A. (2017). Theories and Frameworks for Online Education: Seeking an Integrated Model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190.
Pinder, C. C. (1984). Work motivation: theory, issues, and applications. Ill.: Scott, Foresman.
Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53-60.
Rajabalee, B. Y., Santally, M. I., & Rennie, F. (2020). A study of the relationship between students’ engagement and their academic performances in an eLearning environment. E-learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 1-20.
Richards, G. (2011). Measuring engagement: Learning analytics in online learning. electronic Kazan, 2011. Kazan, Tatarstan, Russian Federation.
Rietz, T. A. (2001). Students’ perceptions of motivation: The importance of the student-teacher relationship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Louis University, Evasion, Illinois.
Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M. & Bowen, G. L. (1998). Social support networks and school outcomes: the centrality of the teacher. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17, 204-226.
Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (1998). Peer interaction, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social Emotional, and Personality Development (pp. 621-700). New York: Wiley.
Sabah, Nasser M. (2013). Students’ Attitude and Motivation Towards E-learning. Proceedings of The First International Conference on Applied Sciences Gaza-Palestine, 24-26 Sep 2013 ICAS-20.
Sardiman, A. M. (2012). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Schleicher, A. (2015). S Strengthening Teacher’s Sense of Effectiveness. Education Journal, 43(1), 1-33.
Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students’ engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of computer assisted learning, 35(3), 378-389.
Stearns, Elizabeth (2010). Opportunities to participate: Extracurricular activities’ distribution across and academic correlates in high schools. Social Science Research, 39(2), 296-309.
Stegers‐Jager, K. M., Cohen‐Schotanus, J., & Themmen, A. P. (2012). Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Medical education, 46(7), 678-688.
Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M. & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in academic achievement. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.
Sun, H. L., Sun, T., Sha, F. Y., Gu, X. Y., Hou, X. R., Zhu, F. Y., & Fang, P. T. (2022). The Influence of Teacher–Student Interaction on the Effects of Online Learning: Based on a Serial Mediating Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-10.
Sun, J. C. Y., & Wu, Y. T. (2016). Analysis of learning achievement and teacher–student interactions in flipped and conventional classrooms. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), 79-99.
Tawafak, R. M., AlSideir, A., Alfarsi, G., Al-Nuaimi, M. N., Malik, S. I., & Jabbar, J. (2019). E-learning vs. traditional learning for learners satisfaction. E-learning, 29(3), 388-397. The British Academy (2020). THE COVID DECADE Understanding the long-term societal impacts of COVID-19.
Tho, N. D. (2017). Knowledge transfer from business schools to business organizations: the roles absorptive capacity, learning motivation, acquired knowledge and job autonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1240-1253.
Toro-Troconis, M., Alexander, J., & Frutos-Perez, M. (2019). Assessing student engagement in online programmes: Using learning design and learning analytics. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(6), 171–183
Tualaulelei, E., Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Cameron, C. (2021). Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1-15.
Uno, H. B. (2014). Motivation theory and measurement: Analysis in educational field. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: a decade of research. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 271–296.

Wang, W., Guo, L., He, L., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: Insights from MOOC. Behavior & Information Technology, 38(6), 621-636.
Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198−1209.
Wighting, M. J., Liu, J., & Rovai, A. P. (2008). Distinguishing sense of community and motivation characteristics between online and traditional college students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 285-295.
Wichadee, S. (2014). Students’ Learning Behavior, Motivation and Critical Thinking in Learning Management Systems. Journal of Educators Online, 11(3), n3.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2010). Self-regulated learning and socio-cognitive theory. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd Edition. New York: Elsevier Science & Technology Books.
Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407–415.
Wubbels, T., Jack L., Mieke B. (1997). Paying Attention to Relationships. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 82-86.
Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2022). Learning analytics intervention improves students’ engagement in online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 449-460.
Zhang W, Wang Y, Yang L, Wang C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(55), 2-6.
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00544.x
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top