臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：租隙理論之發展及其限制
書刊名：臺灣土地科學學報
作者：李承嘉 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Chen-jai
出版日期：2000
卷期：1
頁次：頁67-89
主題關鍵詞：租隙；仕紳化；地租；Rent gap；Gentrification；Ground rent
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:78
　　　　　仕紳化為歐美大都市發展的新現象，其可簡單定義為中上階層遷入原先已經破敗都市地區的一種現象。但仕紳化仍然是一個混沌且複雜的觀念，因此，研究者嘗試以不同的角度來解釋他，在諸多解釋中，以租隙理論為最具綜合性的解釋依據。自從Smith於1979年提出租隙理論以後，雖有許多追隨者，但租隙理論仍然受到許多批評，本文旨在敘明租隙理論的發展，並從地租理論的觀點及相關實證結果，對租隙理論進行檢驗。經本文分析發現，租隙理論用在解釋仕紳化上的一些命題需再予驗證，且其適用性亦頗受限制。
　　　　　Gentrification is a new phenomenon of urban development in many large cites. Gentrification can bedefinited briefly as the widespred emergence of middle- and upper middle-class enclaves in formerly deteriorated, inner-city neighborhoods. But the concept of the gentrification is still in chaos and complexity, and sothere are many explanations why the gentrification exists in a city. Under the differential explanations is therent gap theory by far the most sophisticated teoretically developed explanation available to date. Smith's rentgap theory of gentrification has received a substantial amount of attention since it appeared in 1979. Thispaper reviews the rent gap theory and re-examines it from the view of point of ground rent theory, and findsthat the existed rent gap theory could not completely be applied to explanation of gentrification in TaipeiCity.
圖書
1.Clark, E.(1987)。The Rent Gap and Urban Change: Case Studies in Malmö 1860-1985。Kent：Lund：Chartwell Bratt：Lund University Press。  new window
2.Harvey, David(1973)。Social Justice and the City。Baltimore：The John Hopkins University Press。  new window
其他
1.李承嘉(1996)。仕紳化意涵之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.李承嘉(1996)。都市地租理論之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.李承嘉(1997)。仕紳化之研究(I)。  延伸查詢new window
4.廖家顯(1996)。迪化街租隙之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.邊泰明(1991)。都市土地利用強度與土地需求價格彈性。  延伸查詢new window
6.Badcock, B.(1989)。An Australian View of the Rent Gap Hypothesis。  new window
7.Beauregard, R.A.(1986)。The Chaos and Complexity of Gentrification。  new window
8.Bourassa, S.C.(1990)。Another Australian View of the Rent Gap Hypothesis。  new window
9.Bourassa,S.C.(1993)。The Rent Gap Debunked。  new window
10.Bourne,L.S.(1993)。The Myth and Reality of Gentrification: A Commentary on Emerging Urban Forms。  new window
11.Carpenter,J.(1995)。Gentrification in New York, London and Paris: An International Comparison。  new window
12.Clark, E.(1992)。On Gaps in Gentrification Theory。  new window
13.Clark, E.(1995)。The Rent Gap Re-examined。  new window
14.Duncan, S.(1988)。Land policy in Sweden: separating ownership from development。  new window
15.Engels, B.(1994)。Capital Flows, Redling and Gentrification: The Pattern of Mortage Lending and Social Change in Glebe, Sydney,1960-1984。  new window
16.Gaffney, M.(1969)。Land Rent, Taxation, and Public Policy。  new window
17.Hamnett, C.(1984)。Gentrification and Residential Location Theory: A Review and Assessment。  new window
18.Hamnett, C.(1991)。The Blind Men and the Elephant: The Explanation of Gentrification。  new window
19.Hamnett, S.(1984)。The Role of Landlord Disinvestment in Housing Market Transformation:An Analysis of the Flat Break-up Market in Central London。  new window
20.Hassis, H.-A.(1987)。Bodenpreise, Bodenmarkt und Stadtentwicklung : eine Studie zur sozialräumlichen Differenzierung städtischer Gebiete am Beispiel von Freiburg/Br，München。  new window
21.Hofmeister,B.(1993)。Stadtgeographie,6.neu bearbeitete Auflage，Braunschweig。  new window
22.Krätke, S.(1991)。Strukturwandel der Städte: Städtesystem und Grundstücksmarkt in der >Postfordistischennew window
23.Ley, D.(1986)。Alternative Explanation for Inner-city Gentrification: A Canadian Assessment。  new window
24.London, B.(1986)。The Determinants of Gentrification in the United States: ACity-level Analysis,。  new window
25.Massey, D. and Catalano, A.(1978)。Capital and Land, Land Ownership by Capital in Great Britain，London。  new window
26.Munt, I.(1987)。Economic Restructuring, Culture and Gentrification: A Case Study in Battersea, London。  new window
27.Schaffer, R.(1986)。The Gentrification of Harlem?。  new window
28.Smith, N.(1979)。Toward a Theory of Gentrification:A Back to the City Movement by Capital,not People。  new window
29.Smith, N.(1982)。Gentrification and uneven development。  new window
30.Smith, N.(1987)。Gentrification and the Rent Gap。  new window
31.Smith, N. and Williams, P.(Eds.)(1986)。Gentrification of the City，Boston。  new window
32.Williams, P.(1986)。From "Renaissance" to Restructuring: The Dynamics of Contemporary Urban Development。  new window
33.Zukin, S.(1987)。Gentrification: Culture and Capital in the Urban Core。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：326（臺灣：283，外國：43） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1328876 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67127334
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上