:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國教師薪給制度改革趨勢之研究
書刊名:高雄師大學報
作者:陳麗珠 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Li-ju
出版日期:2000
卷期:11
頁次:頁157-179
主題關鍵詞:教師薪給制度教師專業發展教師認證制度教育改革Teacher salaryProfessional developmentTeacher certificationEducation reform
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
     本文探討一九九○年代美國教師薪給制度改革之趨勢,首?由薪給制度之沿革談起,接著介紹薪給制度之現況、過去幾個改進方案內容以及實施成效、近年來的改進方案、以及幾個實施教師薪給制度改革的範例等。根據以上改革趨勢分析,本文建議我國將來在規劃教師薪給制度改革時可以將下列各項作法列入參考:(一)成立專業的民間教師認證機構,(二)根據教師的能力敘薪,(三)針對教師專業發展發給額外給付,(四)針對學校品質檢討發給額外給付,(五)以團體整體表現作為獎賞標準,(六)針對學生成就程度制訂獎賞標準。
     This study explored the recent trends of reform in American school teachers' salary system. After the history of teacher salary system, the current operational system of teacher salary, and two of the reform proposals in the past were synopsized, this study then discussed the recent reform proposals in the 1990's, and some examples of reform in several states were also reviewed. Based on the above exploration, this study made the following suggestions for Taiwan's policy-makers: (1)A non-governmental professional organization is needed for teacher certification. (2)The teachers should be paid on the basis of their competency. (3)The teachers should be given contingency pay when they are proved to have made progress on their professional development. (4)The schools should be given contingency pay when it is proved to have made progress on quality improvement. (5)When awarding schools for their progress in student achievement, the awards should be given to the school as a whole, not to nay single teacher or administrator. (6)When assessing teachers' performance, students' levels of achievement should be taken into consideration.
期刊論文
1.Adams, J.(1993)。School finance reform and systemic school change: Reconstructing Kentucky's public schools。Journal of Education Finance,18,318-345。  new window
2.Colney, S. C.、Odden, A.(1995)。Linking teacher compensation to teacher career development: A strategic examination。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,17(2),253-269。  new window
3.Geber, B.(1992)。Saturn's grand experiment。Training,29,27-35。  new window
4.Lipsky, D. B.、Bacharach, S. B.(1983)。The single salary schedule vs. merit pay: An examination of the debate。Collective Bargaining Quarterly,11(4),1-11。  new window
圖書
1.Spring, Joel H.(1994)。The American School, 1642-1993。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.National Commission on Excellence in Education(1983)。A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform: A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education。A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform: A Report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education。Washington, DC。  new window
3.Clotfelter, C. T.、Ladd, H. F.(1996)。Recognizing and rewarding success in public schools。Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education。Washington, DC。  new window
4.Corcoran, Thomas(1995)。Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development。Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
5.Cornett, L. M.(1994)。Ups and downs of incentive programs。Ups and downs of incentive programs。沒有紀錄:Southern Regional Education Board Career Ladder Clearinghouse。  new window
6.English, F.(1992)。History and critical issues of educational compensation systems。Teacher Compensation and Motivation。Lancaster, PA。  new window
7.Katz, M. B.(1987)。Reconstructing American Education。Reconstructing American Education。Cambridge, MA。  new window
8.National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(1999)。What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do。What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Odden, A.、Kelley, Carolyn(1996)。Paying Teachers for What they Know and Do: New and Smarter Compensation Strategies to Improve Schools。Paying Teachers for What they Know and Do: New and Smarter Compensation Strategies to Improve Schools。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top