:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:主權與戰爭:兩岸關係的轉捩點
書刊名:遠景季刊
作者:陳偉華
作者(外文):Chen, Wei-hwa
出版日期:2001
卷期:2:3
頁次:頁189-211
主題關鍵詞:主權主權移讓戰爭領土統治者與被統治者想像社區SovereigntySovereignty lendingWarTerritoryRuler and ruledImagined community
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:60
     主權概念變遷源自數百年來政治環境之轉型。傳統上,主權國家的構成要件包括人民、領土、管轄權與國坐能力。時至今日,主權國家所面臨的挑戰,不惟來自內部也來自外部,而其對領土完整的強力主張,也相對地加劇了國家自身的威脅。隨著資訊的普及與國家間互動頻繁,國家的本質亦隨之改變。過去強調以武力維護領土與管轄權主權爭議,其實自1949年兩岸分離分治後已不具實質意義。中共若意圖以戰爭解決領土主權問題,最終恐將演變成臺灣追求獨立的戰爭。
     The Transformations of contending concepts of sovereignty have been originated from a transition of international political environment in the past few hundred years. Traditionally, a state is een as a human community that successfully claims its legitimate sovereignty within a given territory. And a sovereign state contains populations, territory, jurisdiction and the capability of national defense. Nowadays, challenges come not just between territories but within territories as well, the more vigorously the state asserts its territorial integrity and identity, the more manifest is the challenge from within and without. This is simply because goods and information across their territories and interdependence among states are changing the nature of states. Forces that were seen valid for the protection of state's jurisdiction and territorial integrity have been regarded as invalid and even illegal. Using military force against its people or others, for whatever reasons, violates social contract by treating people as a mere object. Which obviously destroys the relationship between rulers and ruled and undermines the legitimacy of the administrator and the society as well. An international intervention may thus be incurred. As for Taiwan (ROC), its connection with Mainland China nowadays has nothing to do with sovereignty itself ever since their separation in 1949. However, the major driving force, the myth of imagined communities, has become the only excuse for PRC's military invasion into Taiwan. In so doing, a war that is to be claimed as keeping territorial integrity for China will turn out to be a solemn war for Taiwan's independence.
期刊論文
1.Christensen, Thomas J.(2001)。Posing Problems without Catching Up: China's Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy。International Security,25(4),5-40。  new window
2.Connor, Walker(1972)。Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?。World Politics,24(3),319-355。  new window
3.Zhao, Suisheng(2000)。Chinese Nationalism and Its International Organization。Political Science Quarterly,115(1),16-23。  new window
4.Zacher, M. W.(2001)。The Territorial Integrity Norm。International Organization,55(2),215-250。  new window
5.Thomson, J. E.(1995)。State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research。International Studies Quarterly,39,213-233。  new window
6.Kane, Thomas(2001)。China's Foundations: Guiding Principles of Chinese Foreign Policy。Comparative Strategy,20(1),45-55。  new window
7.陳偉華(2000)。主權概念之變遷與時代意義。戰略與國際研究,2(2),85-102。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃沛榮(2009)。部件教學法的運用及其局限。漢字教學的理論和實踐。臺北:樂學書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Spegele, Roger D.(1996)。Political Realism in international Theory。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Machiavelli, Niccolò、Skinner, Quentin、Price, Russell(1988)。The Prince。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Detter, I.(2000)。The Law of War。London, UK。  new window
5.James, Alan(1986)。Sovereign Statehood: The Basis of International Society。London:Boston:Allen & Unwin。  new window
6.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.、Donahue, John D.(2000)。Governance in a Globalizing World。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
7.Giddens, Anthony(1985)。The Nation-State and Violence。Polity Press。  new window
8.丘宏達(1998)。現代國際法。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bartkus, Viva Ona(1999)。The Dynamic of Secession。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Buchheit, Lee C.(1978)。Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination。Yale University Press。  new window
11.Bull, Hedley(1977)。The Anarchical society: A Study of Order in World Politics。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
12.董霖(1993)。國際公法與國際組織。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
13.Krasner, Stephen D.(1999)。Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy。Princeton University Press。  new window
14.Jackson, Robert H.(1990)。Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World。Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Lamb, A.(1968)。Asian Frontiers: Studies in a Continuing Problem。Asian Frontiers: Studies in a Continuing Problem。London, UK。  new window
16.Gross, L.(1968)。The Peace of Westphalia, 1648-1948。International Law and Organization。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
17.Anderson, M.(1996)。Frontiers: Territory and State Formation in the Modern World。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
18.Shehadi, K. S.(1997)。Clash of Principles: Self-Determination, State Sovereignty, and Ethnic Conflict。State Sovereignty: Change and Persistence in International Relations。Pennsylvania, USA。  new window
19.Hoffman, J.(1995)。Beyond the State。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
20.Mclean, I.(1996)。Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics。Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
21.Krasner, S.(1985)。Sovereignty and Its Discontents。New States, Sovereignty and Intervention。Aldershot, UK。  new window
22.Knutsen, T. L.(1997)。A History of International Relations Theory。A History of International Relations Theory。Manchester。  new window
23.吳嘉生(1999)。國家之主權與國際責任。國家之主權與國際責任。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.Zacher, M. W.(0)。The Decaying Pillars of the Implication for International Order and Governance。Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics。沒有紀錄。  new window
25.Neuman, S. G.(1998)。International Relations: Theory and the Third World: An Oxymoron。International Relations Theory and the Third World。London, UK。  new window
26.Cobban, A.(1969)。The Nation-State and National Self-Determination。The Nation-State and National Self-Determination。London, UK。  new window
27.宋宏煦(1993)。外交自存與霸權干涉。外交自存與霸權干涉。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
28.Chiu, Hungdah(1995)。The International Legal Status of the Republic of China。The International Legal Status of the Republic of China。Baltimore, MD。  new window
圖書論文
1.Heuser, Beatrice(1997)。Sovereignty, Self-Determination, and Security: New World Orders in the Twentieth Century。State Sovereignty: Change and Persistence in International Relations。Pennsylvania:Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
2.Crawford, J.(1967)。The Criteria for Statehood in International Law。British Yearbook of International Law。London, UK。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE